Literature DB >> 11512070

Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations.

M R Popovic1, A Curt, T Keller, V Dietz.   

Abstract

This review describes the state of art in the field of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and its impact on improving grasping and walking functions in acute and chronic Spinal Cord Injured (SCI) patients. It is argued that during the early rehabilitation period the FES systems with surface stimulation electrodes should be used to assist training of hand and leg movements in SCI patients. Our clinical trials have shown that a number of acute SCI patients with impaired walking and grasping functions could improve these functions due to training with an adjustable FES system to the point that they finally did not need the FES system to carry out these tasks. Other acute SCI patients, who did not recover the desired function, were enabled to perform either walking or grasping with the FES assistance. We believe that the subjects who can perform grasping or walking with the help of FES, and still use the neuroprosthesis 6 months after being subjected to the FES training, should consider the FES system as a prosthetic device in Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Despite the significant technical progress achieved in the last 10 to 15 years in the FES field, there is a general consensus that these systems are not sufficiently advanced and that they need further development. The limited acceptance of the FES technology can be in part explained by the fact that it is not completely mature and that the patients still require daily assistance to use the FES systems. Nevertheless the present FES treatments combined with conventional occupational and physical therapy still remain the most promising approach in rehabilitating SCI patients. In this review, advantages and limitations of different FES systems that are used to restore grasping and walking functions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11512070     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  25 in total

1.  Cortical and subcortical correlates of functional electrical stimulation of wrist extensor and flexor muscles revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Armin Blickenstorfer; Raimund Kleiser; Thierry Keller; Birgit Keisker; Martin Meyer; Robert Riener; Spyros Kollias
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Restoring voluntary grasping function in individuals with incomplete chronic spinal cord injury: pilot study.

Authors:  Naaz Kapadia; Vera Zivanovic; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013

3.  Randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation therapy for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on quality of life and community participation.

Authors:  Sander L Hitzig; B Catharine Craven; Aliza Panjwani; Naaz Kapadia; Lora M Giangregorio; Kieva Richards; Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013

4.  Biocompatibility study of three distinct carbon pastes for application as electrode material in neural stimulations and recordings.

Authors:  Melinda Varga; Paul Wolff; Klaus-Juergen Wolter
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Yohei Masugi; Hiroki Obata; Atsushi Sasaki; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on body composition.

Authors:  Lora Giangregorio; Catharine Craven; Kieva Richards; Naaz Kapadia; Sander L Hitzig; Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Volitional walking via upper limb muscle-controlled stimulation of the lumbar locomotor center in man.

Authors:  Syusaku Sasada; Kenji Kato; Suguru Kadowaki; Stefan J Groiss; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Yukio Nishimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Integrating rehabilitation engineering technology with biologics.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Brad E Dicianno; Douglas J Weber; Xinyan Tracy Cui; Wei Wang; David M Brienza; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  The effectiveness of progressively increasing stimulation frequency and intensity to maintain paralyzed muscle force during repetitive activation in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Li-Wei Chou; Samuel C Lee; Therese E Johnston; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Naaz Kapadia; Vera Zivanovic; Molly Verrier; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.