| Literature DB >> 30460239 |
Indranill Basu-Ray1,2, Deepthi Sudhakar3, Gregory Schwing4, Dominique Monlezun4, Lucy Zhang5, Sumit K Shah6, Deep Pujara1, Kevin Ting3, Nidal Abi Rafeh4, Gholam Ali4, Mark Cassidy4, Kenneth Ellenbogen7, Glen Levine3, Wilson Lam3, Nilesh Mathuria1, Mohammad Saeed3, Jared Bunch8, Sheryl Martin-Schild9, Michael Gold10, Arash Aryana11, Mehdi Razavi1, Abdi Rasekh1.
Abstract
Importance: Ischemic strokes pose a significant health burden. However, the etiology of between 20 and 40% of these events remains unknown. Left atrial appendage morphology may influence the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the role of LAA morphology in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardioembolic-associated stroke and patients with cryptogenic stroke without atrial fibrillation. LAA morphology is classified into two groups: (1) simple (chicken-wing) vs. (2) complex (non-chicken wing) based on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings. In addition to the LAA morphology, left atrial parameters, including orifice diameter, depth, emptying velocity, and filling velocity, were collected for both groups. Mathematical, computational models were constructed to investigate flow velocities in chicken-wing and non-chicken wing morphological patterns to assess LAA function further. Findings: TEE values for volume, size, emptying, and filling velocities were similar between simple and complex LAA morphology groups. Patients with cryptogenic stroke without coexisting AF were noted to have significantly higher rates of complex LAA morphology. Chicken-wing LAA morphology was associated with four-fold higher flow rate (kg/s) in computational simulations. Conclusions: Complex LAA morphology may be an independent contributing factor for cryptogenic strokes. Further studies are warranted to investigate the mechanism involved in LAA morphology and thromboembolic events.Entities:
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; complex LAA morphology; cryptogenic stroke; left atrial appendage; left atrial appendage closure
Year: 2018 PMID: 30460239 PMCID: PMC6232927 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Transesophageal images of left atrial appendage (LAA) morphologies. Functional classification of LAA based on thrombogenicity. Left to right: S, simple LAA or SLA2M (chicken wing based on prior classifications); C, Complex LAA or CLA2M (includes chicken wing with pectinated walls and other complex morphologies including cauliflower, cactus and windsock).
Figure 2Study design and flowchart.
Parameter comparison between patients with cardioembolic associate stroke and cryptogenic stroke.
| Age | 57.43 ± 10.63 | 70.38 ± 8.52 | 0.0001 |
| Height | 166.22 ± 22.63 | 173.22 ± 8.81 | 0.3365 |
| Weight | 84.94 ± 28.24 | 83.6 ± 18.37 | 0.965 |
| BMI | 38.93 ± 53.9 | 27.85 ± 5.55 | 0.809 |
| CHA2DS2-VASc | 2.65 ± 2.1 | 3.92 ± 1.69 | 0.029 |
| African American | 11 (45.83) | 13 (56.52) | 0.464 |
| Females | 11 (45.83) | 11(47.83) | 0.891 |
| Atrial Fibrillation | 24 (100) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
| Prior stroke | 8 (33.33) | 9 (39.13) | 0.679 |
| Hypertension | 20 (83.33) | 15 (65.22) | 0.154 |
| Diabetes | 8 (33.33) | 10 (43.48) | 0.474 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 11 (45.83) | 11 (47.83) | 0.891 |
| Coronary artery disease | 4 (16.67) | 2 (8.7) | 0.666 |
| CHF | 9 (37.5) | 1 (4.35) | 0.010 |
| CAD equivalents | 3 (12.5) | 1 (4.35) | 0.609 |
| Tobacco use | 4 (16.67) | 13 (56.52) | 0.004 |
| Antiplatelet therapy | 13 (54.17) | 8 (34.78) | 0.181 |
| Anticoagulation therapy | 4 (17.39) | 0 (0) | 0.109 |
| Antihypertensive therapy | 18 (75) | 12 (52.17) | 0.104 |
| Statin therapy | 12 (52.17) | 5 (21.74) | 0.032 |
| Complex LAA morphology | 8 (33.33) | 15 (65.22) | 0.029 |
Significant p-value.
Baseline patient demographics.
| Age, y | 65 ± 12 | 63 ± 12 | 0.60 |
| Height, cm | 167 ± 10 | 172 ± 10 | 0.59 |
| Weight, Kg | 84 ± 24 | 85 ± 24 | 0.67 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 38 ± 54 | 29 ± 7 | 0.96 |
| CHA2DS2-VASc | 3.4 ± 1.9 | 3.2 ± 2.1 | 0.68 |
| African American, | 11 (46%) | 13 (56%) | 0.46 |
| Females, | 11 (46%) | 11 (48%) | 0.89 |
| Atrial fibrillation, | 16 (67%) | 8 (35%) | 0.03 |
| Prior stroke, | 9 (38%) | 8 (35%) | 0.85 |
| Cryptogenic stroke, | 8 (33%) | 15 (65%) | 0.03 |
| Hypertension, | 19 (79%) | 16 (70%) | 0.45 |
| Diabetes, | 8 (33%) | 10 (43%) | 0.47 |
| Hyperlipidemia, | 11 (46%) | 11 (48%) | 0.89 |
| Coronary artery disease, | 3 (12%) | 3 (13%) | 0.96 |
| Heart failure, | 6 (25%) | 4 (17%) | 0.72 |
| Coronary artery disease equivalent, | 2 (8%) | 2 (9%) | 1.00 |
| Tobacco use, | 7 (30%) | 10 (43%) | 0.36 |
| Antiplatelet therapy, | 12 (50%) | 9 (39%) | 0.45 |
| Anticoagulation therapy, | 3 (12%) | 1 (5%) | 0.61 |
| Antihypertensive therapy, | 15 (62%) | 15 (65%) | 0.85 |
| Statin therapy, | 10 (42%) | 7 (32%) | 0.85 |
| Moderate/severe mitral regurgitation, | 8 (33%) | 8 (39%) | 0.61 |
Significant p-value.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging parameters.
| Pulmonary artery pressure, mmHg | 40 ± 13 | 41 ± 16 | 0.82 |
| Left atrial size, mm | 52 ± 61 | 42 ± 26 | 0.73 |
| Left atrial volume index, mm3 | 46 ± 26 | 35 ± 17 | 0.08 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction, % | 47 ± 16 | 55 ± 8 | 0.13 |
| Left ventricular size, mm | 75 ± 18 | 108 ± 81 | 0.31 |
| Peak LAA filling velocity, cm/s | 36 ± 20 | 36 ± 15 | 0.95 |
| Peak LAA emptying velocity, cm/s | 38 ± 21 | 44 ± 21 | 0.43 |
| LAA orifice diameter, mm | 20 ± 6 | 18 ± 6 | 0.14 |
| LAA depth, mm | 37 ± 12 | 35 ± 13 | 0.36 |
Multivariable logistic regression model for association between cryptogenic stroke and complex left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology adjusted for age and CHA2DS2-VASC score.
| Age | 0.85 | 0.05 | 0.004 | 0.75 | 0.95 |
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 0.96 | 0.21 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 1.47 |
| Complex LAA morphology | 5.00 | 3.97 | 0.04 | 1.05 | 23.7 |
Significant p-value.
Figure 3Mathematical modeling of flow velocities inside the left atrial appendage (LAA). Flow velocities of the simple (A) and complex (B) LAA morphologies. The chicken wing LAA morphology (C) is associated with 4-fold higher flow rate (kg/s) at the LAA opening as compared to the non-chicken wing morphology (D).
Figure 4Left atrial appendage (LAA) opening velocities. Velocities at the center of the LAA orifice are higher in the chicken wing (solid, blue) as compared to the non-chicken wing (dashed, green) morphology (time measured over 5 cycles).