Literature DB >> 25908774

Randomized trial of atrial arrhythmia monitoring to guide anticoagulation in patients with implanted defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices.

David T Martin1, Malcolm M Bersohn2, Albert L Waldo3, Mark S Wathen4, Wassim K Choucair5, Gregory Y H Lip6, John Ip7, Richard Holcomb8, Joseph G Akar9, Jonathan L Halperin10.   

Abstract

AIMS: Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) detected by implanted devices are often atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) associated with stroke. We hypothesized that introduction and termination of anticoagulation based upon AT monitoring would reduce both stroke and bleeding. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We randomized 2718 patients with dual-chamber and biventricular defibrillators to start and stop anticoagulation based on remote rhythm monitoring vs. usual office-based follow-up with anticoagulation determined by standard clinical criteria. The primary analysis compared the composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding with the two strategies. The trial was stopped after 2 years median follow-up based on futility of finding a difference in primary endpoints between groups. A total of 945 patients (34.8%) developed AT, 264 meeting study anticoagulation criteria. Adjudicated atrial electrograms confirmed AF in 91%; median time to initiate anticoagulation was 3 vs. 54 days in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Primary events (2.4 vs. 2.3 per 100 patient-years) did not differ between groups (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.75-1.51; P = 0.732). Major bleeding occurred at 1.6 vs. 1.2 per 100 patient-years (HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.89-2.17; P = 0.145). In patients with AT, thromboembolism rates were 1.0 vs. 1.6 per 100 patient-years (relative risk -35.3%; 95% CI -70.8 to 35.3%; P = 0.251). Although AT burden was associated with thromboembolism, there was no temporal relationship between AT and stroke.
CONCLUSION: In patients with implanted defibrillators, the strategy of early initiation and interruption of anticoagulation based on remotely detected AT did not prevent thromboembolism and bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: IMPACT ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00559988 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00559988?term=NCT00559988&amp;rank=1 ). Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmia monitoring; Atrial fibrillation; Oral anticoagulation; Randomized controlled clinical trial; Stroke prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908774     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  85 in total

1.  Atrial Fibrillation Burden Signature and Near-Term Prediction of Stroke: A Machine Learning Analysis.

Authors:  Lichy Han; Mariam Askari; Russ B Altman; Susan K Schmitt; Jun Fan; Jason P Bentley; Sanjiv M Narayan; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-15

2.  An unsolved issue: utility of implantable loop recorder monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients.

Authors:  Gulmira Kudaiberdieva; Bulent Gorenek
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Practice Variation in Anticoagulation Prescription and Outcomes After Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander C Perino; Jun Fan; Mariam Askari; Paul A Heidenreich; Edmund Keung; Merritt H Raitt; Jonathan P Piccini; Paul D Ziegler; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Targeted Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Continuous Rhythm Assessment With an Insertable Cardiac Monitor: The Rhythm Evaluation for Anticoagulation With Continuous Monitoring (REACT.COM) Pilot Study.

Authors:  Rod Passman; Peter Leong-Sit; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Anna Huskin; Todd T Tomson; Richard Bernstein; Ethan Ellis; Jonathan W Waks; Peter Zimetbaum
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-11-23

Review 5.  Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: an Overlooked Explanation?

Authors:  Cen Zhang; Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Atrial Fibrillation Monitoring in Cryptogenic Stroke: the Gaps Between Evidence and Practice.

Authors:  Krittapoom Akrawinthawong; Karthik Venkatesh Prasad; Ali Akbar Mehdirad; Scott Wayne Ferreira
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Electrocardiographic Left Atrial Abnormality and Risk of Stroke: Northern Manhattan Study.

Authors:  Hooman Kamel; Madeleine Hunter; Yeseon P Moon; Shadi Yaghi; Ken Cheung; Marco R Di Tullio; Peter M Okin; Ralph L Sacco; Elsayed Z Soliman; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  Straight to the heart: Pleiotropic antiarrhythmic actions of oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Anke C Fender; Reza Wakili; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 7.658

9.  Intermittent vs. Continuous Anticoagulation theRapy in patiEnts with Atrial Fibrillation (iCARE-AF): a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Stavros Stavrakis; Julie A Stoner; Joel Kardokus; Paul J Garabelli; Sunny S Po; Ralph Lazzara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Cost Effectiveness of Implantable Cardiac Monitor-Guided Intermittent Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis of the REACT.COM Pilot Study.

Authors:  Daniel A Steinhaus; Peter J Zimetbaum; Rod S Passman; Peter Leong-Sit; Matthew R Reynolds
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.