Nicholas S Roetker1, C David Page, James A Yonker, Vicky Chang, Carol L Roan, Pamela Herd, Taissa S Hauser, Robert M Hauser, Craig S Atwood. 1. Nicholas S. Roetker, James A. Yonker, Vicky Chang, Carol L. Roan, Pamela Herd, Taissa S. Hauser, and Robert M. Hauser are with the Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Pamela Herd is also with La Follete School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison. C. David Page is with the Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Craig S. Atwood is with the Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, and the Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined depression within a multidimensional framework consisting of genetic, environmental, and sociobehavioral factors and, using machine learning algorithms, explored interactions among these factors that might better explain the etiology of depressive symptoms. METHODS: We measured current depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (n = 6378 participants in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study). Genetic factors were 78 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); environmental factors-13 stressful life events (SLEs), plus a composite proportion of SLEs index; and sociobehavioral factors-18 personality, intelligence, and other health or behavioral measures. We performed traditional SNP associations via logistic regression likelihood ratio testing and explored interactions with support vector machines and Bayesian networks. RESULTS: After correction for multiple testing, we found no significant single genotypic associations with depressive symptoms. Machine learning algorithms showed no evidence of interactions. Naïve Bayes produced the best models in both subsets and included only environmental and sociobehavioral factors. CONCLUSIONS: We found no single or interactive associations with genetic factors and depressive symptoms. Various environmental and sociobehavioral factors were more predictive of depressive symptoms, yet their impacts were independent of one another. A genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations using machine learning methodologies will provide a framework for identifying genetic-environmental-sociobehavioral interactions in depressive symptoms.
OBJECTIVES: We examined depression within a multidimensional framework consisting of genetic, environmental, and sociobehavioral factors and, using machine learning algorithms, explored interactions among these factors that might better explain the etiology of depressive symptoms. METHODS: We measured current depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (n = 6378 participants in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study). Genetic factors were 78 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); environmental factors-13 stressful life events (SLEs), plus a composite proportion of SLEs index; and sociobehavioral factors-18 personality, intelligence, and other health or behavioral measures. We performed traditional SNP associations via logistic regression likelihood ratio testing and explored interactions with support vector machines and Bayesian networks. RESULTS: After correction for multiple testing, we found no significant single genotypic associations with depressive symptoms. Machine learning algorithms showed no evidence of interactions. Naïve Bayes produced the best models in both subsets and included only environmental and sociobehavioral factors. CONCLUSIONS: We found no single or interactive associations with genetic factors and depressive symptoms. Various environmental and sociobehavioral factors were more predictive of depressive symptoms, yet their impacts were independent of one another. A genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations using machine learning methodologies will provide a framework for identifying genetic-environmental-sociobehavioral interactions in depressive symptoms.
Authors: Ann L Coker; Keith E Davis; Ileana Arias; Sujata Desai; Maureen Sanderson; Heather M Brandt; Paige H Smith Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Renee J Thompson; Karen J Parker; Joachim F Hallmayer; Christian E Waugh; Ian H Gotlib Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Floriana S Luppino; Leonore M de Wit; Paul F Bouvy; Theo Stijnen; Pim Cuijpers; Brenda W J H Penninx; Frans G Zitman Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-03
Authors: Marieke Wichers; Gunter Kenis; Nele Jacobs; Ron Mengelers; Catherine Derom; Robert Vlietinck; Jim van Os Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2008-01-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: C D Neff; V Abkevich; J C L Packer; Y Chen; J Potter; R Riley; C Davenport; J DeGrado Warren; S Jammulapati; A Bhathena; W S Choi; P E Kroeger; R E Metzger; A Gutin; M H Skolnick; D Shattuck; D A Katz Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Jennifer Villani; Sheri D Schully; Payam Meyer; Ranell L Myles; Jocelyn A Lee; David M Murray; Ashley J Vargas Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: A Kautzky; T Vanicek; C Philippe; G S Kranz; W Wadsak; M Mitterhauser; A Hartmann; A Hahn; M Hacker; D Rujescu; S Kasper; R Lanzenberger Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 6.222