| Literature DB >> 28588236 |
Feng Li1,2,3, Han Gao4, Lianlian Zhu1,2, Yonghong Xie5,6, Guishan Yang7, Cong Hu1,2, Xinsheng Chen1,2, Zhengmiao Deng1,2.
Abstract
We examined foliarEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28588236 PMCID: PMC5460233 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03126-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A: Water system and location of sampling sites in Dongting Lake. The shaded areas show the wetlands. B: Distribution patterns of common plants along a water level gradient in Dongting Lake: (A) submerged macrophytes, (B) Phalaris arundinacea, (C) Carex brevicuspis, and (D) Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Fig. 1A was generated with software Photoshop 7.0).
Community characteristics of wetland plants (means ± SE) distributed along an elevation gradient of 3 lakeshore areas in Dongting Lake, China.
| Location | Species | Height (cm) | Coverage (%) | Density(plant m2) | Biomass (g m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chapanzhou |
| 124.3 ± 5.5b | 83.3 ± 0.0b | 358.1 ± 56.1b | 209.0 ± 26.9a |
|
| 102.3 ± 2.5a | 97.1 ± 0.0c | 786.7 ± 0.1c | 288.0 ± 24.6a | |
|
| 295.0 ± 3.4c | 58.3 ± 0.0a | 21.3 ± 1.8a | 684.8 ± 53.5b | |
| Beizhouzi |
| 128.3 ± 4.7a | 78.3 ± 0.0b | 184.0 ± 14.9b | 205.3 ± 22.7a |
|
| 108.5 ± 3.6a | 97.8 ± 0.0c | 874.7 ± 42.3c | 354.0 ± 37.7b | |
|
| 303.6 ± 11.9b | 65.0 ± 0.0a | 21.0 ± 0.7a | 541.8 ± 42.7c | |
| Junshan |
| 127.8 ± 3.8b | 95.0 ± 0.0c | 504.0 ± 84.2b | 448.8 ± 34.5ab |
|
| 96.7 ± 2.4a | 86.8 ± 0.0b | 880.0 ± 37.4c | 408.0 ± 35.6a | |
|
| 295.0 ± 15.7c | 64.2 ± 0.0a | 41.6 ± 8.3a | 550.6 ± 30.5b |
Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at the 0.05 significance level.
Physico-chemical characteristics (means ± SE) of soil in the 3 wetland plant communities distributed along an elevation gradient of 3 lakeshores areas in Dongting Lake, China.
| Location | Species | pH | Conductivity (us cm−1) | Water content (%) | Total nitrogen concentration (mg g−1) | Total phosphorus concentration (mg g−1) | Organic carbon (mg g−1) | Elevation (m) | Flooding days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chapanzhou |
| 8.1 ± 0.1b | 278.2 ± 10.7 | 38.6 ± 1.1c | 0.9 ± 0.1a | 0.8 ± 0.0a | 11.6 ± 0.3a | 25.0 ± 0.1b | 179.0 ± 0.8b |
|
| 7.9 ± 0.0ab | 289.8 ± 11.7 | 30.8 ± 1.8b | 2.0 ± 0.2b | 0.9 ± 0.0b | 17.4 ± 1.4b | 24.3 ± 0.1a | 187.2 ± 1.6c | |
|
| 7.8 ± 0.1a | 281.8 ± 62.7 | 22.8 ± 1.0a | 1.3 ± 0.1a | 0.8 ± 0.0a | 16.1 ± 1.6b | 28.5 ± 0.0c | 127.2 ± 0.2a | |
| Beizhouzi |
| 7.9 ± 0.0 | 294.8 ± 27.5b | 37.8 ± 3.0b | 2.5 ± 0.1b | 0.9 ± 0.0a | 21.4 ± 1.1b | 26.2 ± 0.2a | 158.5 ± 4.1b |
|
| 7.9 ± 0.0 | 363.9 ± 21.9c | 49.0 ± 2.2c | 2.8 ± 0.4b | 1.0 ± 0.0b | 28.8 ± 3.4c | 26.3 ± 0.1a | 154.0 ± 0.9b | |
|
| 8.0 ± 0.1 | 177.6 ± 10.7a | 24.6 ± 2.6a | 1.0 ± 0.2a | 0.9 ± 0.0a | 11.6 ± 1.7a | 29.4 ± 0.1b | 86.0 ± 0.0a | |
| Junshan |
| 7.9 ± 0.0ab | 222.8 ± 5.5a | 33.2 ± 1.1c | 1.4 ± 0.1a | 0.9 ± 0.1b | 14.9 ± 0.3 | 22.1 ± 0.0a | 236.0 ± 0.0c |
|
| 7.8 ± 0.0a | 277.3 ± 17.7b | 44.4 ± 2.9b | 1.9 ± 0.2b | 0.7 ± 0.0a | 19.0 ± 0.7 | 22.7 ± 0.1b | 224.0 ± 0.5b | |
|
| 8.0 ± 0.1b | 252.8 ± 7.6ab | 22.2 ± 1.0a | 1.7 ± 0.3ab | 0.7 ± 0.0a | 17.9 ± 3.2 | 26.4 ± 0.2c | 153.5 ± 1.9a |
Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at the 0.05 significance level.
Figure 2Foliar total nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P) concentrations, and foliar N:P ratio of the 3 wetland species distributed along an elevation gradient in 3 lakeshore areas of Dongting Lake, China.
Figure 3Relationship of foliar N:P with foliar total nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P) concentrations of the 3 wetland species distributed along an elevation gradient in 3 lakeshore areas of Dongting Lake, China.
Summary of Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) ordinations.
| Environmental factors | Axis 1 | Axis 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Soil pH | −0.1214 | 0.0335 |
| Soil conductivity | −0.2603 | 0.2487 |
| Soil water content | − | 0.1292 |
| Soil total N concentration | − | 0.2073 |
| Soil total P concentration | − | −0.1588 |
| Soil organic C concentration | −0.1721 | 0.2573 |
| Elevation | 0.2285 | 0.0530 |
| Flooding days | −0.2700 | −0.1175 |
| Eigenvalues | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Species-environment correlations | 0.801 | 0.369 |
| Cumulative percentage variance of species data (%) | 57.0 | 58.5 |
| Cumulative percentage variance of species-environment relation data (%) | 97.4 | 99.7 |
Figure 4Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination for the foliar stoichiometric indexes and soil environmental characteristics of the 3 wetland species distributed along an elevation gradient in 3 lakeshore areas of Dongting Lake, China. N: foliar total nitrogen (N) concentration; P: foliar total phosphorus (P) concentration; N:P: ratio of foliar total N and total P concentrations; pH: soil pH; Con: soil conductivity; TC: soil organic carbon concentration; SW: soil water content; TN: soil total nitrogen concentration; TP: soil total phosphorus concentration; EL: elevation; FD: flooding days.
Figure 5Relationship of foliar stoichiometric indexes with soil phosphorus (P) of the 3 wetland species distributed along an elevation gradient in 3 lakeshore areas of Dongting Lake, China.
Figure 6Relationship of foliar stoichiometric indexes with soil total nitrogen (N) of the 3 wetland species distributed along an elevation gradient in 3 lakeshore areas of Dongting Lake, China.