Literature DB >> 30455228

In Vivo Gentamicin Susceptibility Test for Prevention of Bacterial Biofilms in Bone Tissue and on Implants.

Louise Kruse Jensen1, Thomas Bjarnsholt2,3, Kasper N Kragh2, Bent Aalbæk4, Nicole Lind Henriksen4, Sophie Amalie Blirup4, Karen Pankoke4, Andreas Petersen5, Henrik Elvang Jensen4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to set up an in vivo gentamicin susceptibility test for biofilm prevention in bone tissue and on implants. Twenty-five pigs were allocated to six groups. Pigs in group A (n = 6) were inoculated with saline. Pigs in groups B (n = 6), C (n = 3), D (n = 3), E (n = 3), and F (n = 4) were inoculated with 10 μl saline containing 104 CFU of Staphylococcus aureus Different concentrations based on the MIC of gentamicin for the specific strain were added to the 10-μl inoculum for groups C (160× MIC), D (1,600× MIC), E (16,000× MIC), and F (160,000× MIC). The inocula were injected into a predrilled tibial implant cavity, followed by insertion of a steel implant (2 by 15 mm). The pigs were euthanized after 5 days. In vitro, all the doses used were found to be bactericidal after up to 6 h. All implant cavities of pigs inoculated with bacteria and bacteria plus 160× MIC or 1,600× MIC of gentamicin were positive for S. aureus In animals in each of groups E (16,000× MIC) and F (160,000× MIC), 2/3 and 1/4 of the implant cavities were S. aureus positive, respectively. By grouping groups C and D (<10,000× MIC) and groups E and F (>10,000× MIC), a significant decrease in the number of implant-attached bacteria was seen only between the high-MIC-value group and group B. Histologically, it was demonstrated that 1,600×, 16,000×, and 160,000× MIC resulted in a peri-implant tissue reaction comparable to that in saline-inoculated animals. In vivo, the antimicrobial tolerance of the inoculated planktonic bacteria was increased by in vivo-specific factors of acute inflammation. This resulted in bacterial aggregation and biofilm formation, which further increased the gentamicin tolerance. Thus, susceptibility patterns in vitro might not reflect the actual in vivo susceptibility locally within a developing infectious area.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aminoglycosides; animal models; biofilms; susceptibility testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30455228      PMCID: PMC6355599          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01889-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  29 in total

1.  In vitro prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa early biofilm formation with antibiotics used in cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Ana Fernández-Olmos; María García-Castillo; Luis Maiz; Adelaida Lamas; Fernando Baquero; Rafael Cantón
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 2.  Prophylaxis and treatment of implant-related infections by local application of antibiotics.

Authors:  Michael Diefenbeck; Thomas Mückley; Gunther O Hofmann
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Vincent H Tam; Samer Kabbara; Giao Vo; Amy N Schilling; Elizabeth A Coyle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Jakub Kwiecinski; Gunnar Kahlmeter; Tao Jin
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Single-stage treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with a new absorbable, gentamicin-loaded, calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite: a prospective series of 100 cases.

Authors:  M A McNally; J Y Ferguson; A C K Lau; M Diefenbeck; M Scarborough; A J Ramsden; B L Atkins
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Suppurative Inflammation and Local Tissue Destruction Reduce the Penetration of Cefuroxime to Infected Bone Implant Cavities.

Authors:  L Kruse Jensen; J Koch; N Lind Henriksen; Mats Bue; M Tøttrup; P Hanberg; K Søballe; H Elvang Jensen
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.311

7.  Should standardized susceptibility testing for microbial biofilms be introduced in clinical practice?

Authors:  T Coenye; D Goeres; F Van Bambeke; T Bjarnsholt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  In vitro activity of gentamicin as an adjunct to penicillin against biofilm group B Streptococcus.

Authors:  Corinne Ruppen; Andrew Hemphill; Parham Sendi
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecA(LGA251).

Authors:  M Stegger; P S Andersen; A Kearns; B Pichon; M A Holmes; G Edwards; F Laurent; C Teale; R Skov; A R Larsen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 10.  Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections.

Authors:  Hong Wu; Claus Moser; Heng-Zhuang Wang; Niels Høiby; Zhi-Jun Song
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.344

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The structure-function relationship of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infections and its influence on the microenvironment.

Authors:  Mads Lichtenberg; Tim Holm Jakobsen; Michael Kühl; Mette Kolpen; Peter Østrup Jensen; Thomas Bjarnsholt
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 15.177

2.  Pathological and microbiological impact of a gentamicin-loaded biocomposite following limited or extensive debridement in a porcine model of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Sophie A Blirup-Plum; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Henrik E Jensen; Kasper N Kragh; Bent Aalbæk; Hans Gottlieb; Mats Bue; Louise K Jensen
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 3.  The importance of understanding the infectious microenvironment.

Authors:  Thomas Bjarnsholt; Marvin Whiteley; Kendra P Rumbaugh; Philip S Stewart; Peter Ø Jensen; Niels Frimodt-Møller
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 71.421

4.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics of meropenem in porcine cancellous bone determined by microdialysis: An animal study.

Authors:  Pelle Hanberg; Andrea Lund; Kjeld Søballe; Mats Bue
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Equine or porcine synovial fluid as a novel ex vivo model for the study of bacterial free-floating biofilms that form in human joint infections.

Authors:  Jessica M Gilbertie; Lauren V Schnabel; Noreen J Hickok; Megan E Jacob; Brian P Conlon; Irving M Shapiro; Javad Parvizi; Thomas P Schaer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Synthesis of the cyanobacterial halometabolite Chlorosphaerolactylate B and demonstration of its antimicrobial effect in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Nikoline Jensen; Henrik Elvang Jensen; Bent Aalbaek; Sophie Amalie Blirup-Plum; Sara M Soto; Virginio Cepas; Yuly López; Yaiza Gabasa; Ignacio Gutiérrez-Del-Río; Claudio J Villar; Felipe Lombó; María José Iglesias; Raquel Soengas; Fernando López Ortiz; Louise Kruse Jensen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.064

7.  Extended Release Combination Antibiotic Therapy from a Bone Void Filling Putty for Treatment of Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Raquib Hasan; Kambri Schaner; Meredith Schroeder; Abbey Wohlers; Jacob Shreffler; Codi Schaper; Hariharaputhiran Subramanian; Amanda Brooks
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 6.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.