Literature DB >> 16870751

Comparative pharmacodynamics of gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Vincent H Tam1, Samer Kabbara, Giao Vo, Amy N Schilling, Elizabeth A Coyle.   

Abstract

Aminoglycosides are often used to treat severe infections with gram-positive organisms. Previous studies have shown concentration-dependent killing by aminoglycosides of gram-negative bacteria, but limited data are available for gram-positive bacteria. We compared the in vitro pharmacodynamics of gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Five S. aureus strains were examined (ATCC 29213 and four clinical isolates). Time-kill studies (TKS) in duplicate (baseline inocula of 10(7) CFU/ml) were conducted to evaluate bacterial killing in relation to increasing gentamicin concentrations (0 to 16 times the MIC). Serial samples were obtained over 24 h to quantify bacterial burden. Similar TKS with P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were conducted, and the time courses of the all bacterial strains were mathematically modeled for quantitative comparison. A dose fractionation study (using identical daily doses of gentamicin) in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) over 5 days was subsequently used for data validation for the two ATCC strains. Model fits to the data were satisfactory; r(2) values for the S. aureus and P. aeruginosa ATCC strains were 0.915 and 0.956, respectively. Gentamicin was found to have a partially concentration-dependent killing effect against S. aureus; concentrations beyond four to 8 times the MIC did not result in significantly faster bacterial killing. In contrast, a concentration-dependent profile was demonstrated in suppressing P. aeruginosa regrowth after initial decline in bacterial burden. In HFIM, thrice-daily gentamicin dosing appeared to be superior to once-daily dosing for S. aureus, but they were similar for P. aeruginosa. Different killing profiles of gentamicin were demonstrated against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. These results may guide optimal dosing strategies of gentamicin in S. aureus infections and warrant further investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16870751      PMCID: PMC1538660          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01165-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  24 in total

1.  National survey of extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing.

Authors:  S K Chuck; S R Raber; K A Rodvold; D Areff
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Typing of human and bovine Staphylococcus aureus by RAPD-PCR and ribotyping-PCR.

Authors:  M S V Pereira; N C Leal; T C A Leal; M Sobreira; A M P de Almeida; J P Siqueira-Júnior; G M Campos-Takaki
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.858

3.  Short-course gentamicin in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Brian T Tsuji; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamics of tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Nico Jacobs; Harm Tiddens; Alphonsus M Horrevorts
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: a review.

Authors:  W A Craig; S C Ebert
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1990

7.  Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration.

Authors:  R D Moore; P S Lietman; C R Smith
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 8.  Pharmacodynamics and dosing of aminoglycosides.

Authors:  John Turnidge
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.982

9.  Experimental studies on nephrotoxicity of aminoglycosides at low doses. Mechanisms and perspectives.

Authors:  P M Tulkens
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-06-30       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Choice of drug and dosage regimen. Two important risk factors for aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  M E De Broe; R A Giuliano; G A Verpooten
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-06-30       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  29 in total

1.  Antibiotic stress selects against cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Marie Vasse; Robert J Noble; Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Clara Torres-Barceló; James Gurney; Simon Benateau; Claire Gougat-Barbera; Oliver Kaltz; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Two mechanisms of killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by tobramycin assessed at multiple inocula via mechanism-based modeling.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Neang S Ly; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Nicholin A Wanigaratne; Tony Velkov; Rajbharan Yadav; Antonio Oliver; Lisandra Martin; Beom Soo Shin; Alan Forrest; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Compensation of fitness costs and reversibility of antibiotic resistance mutations.

Authors:  Pia Schulz zur Wiesch; Jan Engelstädter; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Local release of antibiotics for surgical site infection management using high-purity calcium sulfate: an in vitro elution study.

Authors:  Sean S Aiken; John J Cooper; Hannah Florance; Matthew T Robinson; Stephen Michell
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Evaluation of daptomycin combinations with cephalosporins or gentamicin against Streptococcus mitis group strains in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs).

Authors:  Juwon Yim; Jordan R Smith; Nivedita B Singh; Seth Rice; Kyle Stamper; Cristina Garcia de la Maria; Arnold S Bayer; Nagendra N Mishra; José M Miró; Truc T Tran; Cesar A Arias; Paul Sullam; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  Pharmacological considerations for the proper clinical use of aminoglycosides.

Authors:  Spyridon Pagkalis; Elpis Mantadakis; Michael N Mavros; Christina Ammari; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of AZD5206 against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Vincent H Tam; Kai-Tai Chang; Zhen Yang; Joseph Newman; Ming Hu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In Vivo Gentamicin Susceptibility Test for Prevention of Bacterial Biofilms in Bone Tissue and on Implants.

Authors:  Louise Kruse Jensen; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Kasper N Kragh; Bent Aalbæk; Nicole Lind Henriksen; Sophie Amalie Blirup; Karen Pankoke; Andreas Petersen; Henrik Elvang Jensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Quantifying subpopulation synergy for antibiotic combinations via mechanism-based modeling and a sequential dosing design.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Neang S Ly; Hongmei Xu; Brian T Tsuji; Jürgen B Bulitta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Colistin and Polymyxin B Dosage Regimens against Acinetobacter baumannii: Differences in Activity and the Emergence of Resistance.

Authors:  Soon-Ee Cheah; Jian Li; Brian T Tsuji; Alan Forrest; Jürgen B Bulitta; Roger L Nation
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.