| Literature DB >> 30454002 |
Piergiorgio Muriana1, Angelo Carretta2, Paola Ciriaco2, Alessandro Bandiera2, Giampiero Negri2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of the new TNM staging system for thymic epithelial malignancies produced a significant increase in the proportion of patients with stage I disease. The identification of new prognostic factors could help to select patients for adjuvant therapies based on their risk of recurrence. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has recently gained popularity as reliable prognostic biomarker in many different solid tumors. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of NLR evaluation as a prognostic marker in patients with surgically-treated thymoma.Entities:
Keywords: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; Prognostic markers; Surgery; TNM staging; Thymoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30454002 PMCID: PMC6245904 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-018-0805-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg ISSN: 1749-8090 Impact factor: 1.637
Fig. 1ROC analysis of the preoperative NLR value in the cohort of patients surgically treated for thymoma
Patients’ characteristics
| Total | 79 |
| Age (years) | |
| Mean ± SD; range | 58.9 ± 13.4; 27–84 |
| Median | 61 |
| Gender (male) | 47 (60%) |
| Myasthenia gravis | 15 (19%) |
| MGFA class I | 13 |
| MGFA class IIa | 1 |
| MGFA class IIb | 1 |
| Neoadjuvant therapy | 3 (4%) |
| Chemotherapy | 2 |
| Chemo-radiotherapy | 1 |
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | 47 (60%) |
| Surgical approach | |
| Median sternotomy | 65 (82%) |
| Thoracotomy | 4 (5%) |
| VATS | 10 (13%) |
| Surgical procedure | |
| Complete thymectomy | 64 (81%) |
| Extended thymectomy | 15 (19%) |
| WHO classification | |
| A | 5 (6%) |
| AB | 32 (41%) |
| B1 | 16 (20%) |
| B2 | 11 (14%) |
| B3 | 15 (19%) |
| Masaoka-Koga stage | |
| I | 21 (27%) |
| II | 41 (52%) |
| III | 16 (20%) |
| IV | 1 (1%) |
| TNM stage | |
| I | 65 (82%) |
| II | 2 (3%) |
| IIIA | 11 (14%) |
| IIIB | 1 (1%) |
Clinical and pathological features of the patients who experienced recurrence
| Pt # | Age | Sex | MG | NLR | NT | WHO | Masaoka | TNM | AT | DFS | Site | OS | LFU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 36 | M | yes | 2.16 | no | B3 | III | IIIA | yes | 27 | LR | 31 | AL |
| 15 | 63 | M | no | 5.85 | no | B3 | III | IIIB | yes | 16 | LR | 47 | AL |
| 32 | 50 | M | no | 1.68 | yes | B2 | IV | IIIA | yes | 48 | LR | 61 | AL |
| 39 | 36 | M | no | 2.27 | no | B2 | III | I | yes | 48 | LR | 99 | AL |
| 50 | 72 | M | no | 2.46 | no | B3 | II | I | yes | 24 | LR | 75 | D |
| 66 | 52 | F | no | 2.61 | yes | B2 | III | IIIA | yes | 57 | LR | 59 | AL |
Legend: NT Neoadjuvant therapy, AT Adjuvant therapy, LR Loco-regional recurrence, LFU Status at the time of the last follow up, AL Alive, D Deceased
Classification of patients grouped by NLR < 2.27 (low-NLR-Group) and NLR ≥2.27 (high-NLR-Group)
| Low-NLR-Group ( | High-NLR-Group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| < 61 | 28 (60%) | 10 (31%) | 0.021* |
| ≥ 61 | 19 (40%) | 22 (69%) | |
| Gender (male) | 26 (55%) | 21 (66%) | 0.48 |
| Myasthenia gravis | 8 (17%) | 7 (22%) | 0.77 |
| WBC (× 109/L) | 7.0 | 8.1 | 0.09 |
| Neoadjuvant therapy | 2 (4%) | 1 (3%) | 0.79 |
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | 29 (62%) | 18 (56%) | 0.65 |
| WHO classification | |||
| A | 3 (6%) | 2 (6%) | 0.39 |
| AB | 15 (32%) | 17 (53%) | |
| B1 | 12 (26%) | 4 (13%) | |
| B2 | 7 (15%) | 4 (13%) | |
| B3 | 10 (21%) | 5 (15%) | |
| Masaoka-Koga stage | |||
| I | 12 (26%) | 9 (28%) | 0.68 |
| II | 23 (49%) | 18 (56%) | |
| III | 11 (23%) | 5 (16%) | |
| IV | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | |
| TNM stage | |||
| I | 37 (79%) | 28 (88%) | 0.028* |
| II | 0 (0%) | 2 (6%) | |
| IIIA | 10 (21%) | 1 (3%) | |
| IIIB | 0 (0%) | 1 (3%) | |
Significant data are marked (*)
Fig. 2Boxplots reporting WBC, neutrophil and lymphocyte values according to TNM stage. Total WBC (a) and neutrophil (b) count means did not significantly differ between patients in stages I-II and those in stages IIIA/B (7.2 vs 9.1 × 109/L and 4.4 vs 5.1 × 109/L, p = 0.074 and p = 0.36, respectively). By contrast, lymphocyte count mean (c) resulted higher in stages IIIA/B compared to stages I-II (3.1 vs 2.1 × 109/L, p = 0.036)
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier DFS curves for the low-NLR-Group (NLR < 2.27) and the high-NLR-Group (NLR ≥2.27). DFS is lower in the high-NLR-Group patients, but does not reach statistical significance (p = 0.34)
Fig. 4Kaplan-Meier DFS curves for the low-NLR-Group and the high-NLR-Group in TNM I-II stages. None of the patients in the low-NLR-Group had disease relapse. One-, 2- and 5-year DFS in the high-NLR-Group were 100, 95 and 84%, respectively (p = 0.043)
Cox regression multivariate analysis of predictors of DFS
| HR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| WHO classification | 5.315 (0.812–34.788) | 0.081 |
| Masaoka-Koga stage | 4.040 (0.366–44.596) | 0.254 |
| TNM stage | 3.986 (1.644–9.665) | 0.002* |
| NLR | 5.272 (0.897–30.995) | 0.066 |
Significant data are marked (*)