Literature DB >> 21635299

Modeling the Developmental Patterning of Finiteness Marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish Using MOSAIC.

Daniel Freudenthal1, Julian M Pine, Javier Aguado-Orea, Fernand Gobet.   

Abstract

In this study, we apply MOSAIC (model of syntax acquisition in children) to the simulation of the developmental patterning of children's optional infinitive (OI) errors in 4 languages: English, Dutch, German, and Spanish. MOSAIC, which has already simulated this phenomenon in Dutch and English, now implements a learning mechanism that better reflects the theoretical assumptions underlying it, as well as a chunking mechanism that results in frequent phrases being treated as 1 unit. Using 1, identical model that learns from child-directed speech, we obtain a close quantitative fit to the data from all 4 languages despite there being considerable cross-linguistic and developmental variation in the OI phenomenon. MOSAIC successfully simulates the difference between Spanish (a pro-drop language in which OI errors are virtually absent) and obligatory subject languages that do display the OI phenomenon. It also highlights differences in the OI phenomenon across German and Dutch, 2 closely related languages whose grammar is virtually identical with respect to the relation between finiteness and verb placement. Taken together, these results suggest that (a) cross-linguistic differences in the rates at which children produce OIs are graded, quantitative differences that closely reflect the statistical properties of the input they are exposed to and (b) theories of syntax acquisition need to consider more closely the role of input characteristics as determinants of quantitative differences in the cross-linguistic patterning of phenomena in language acquisition. 2007 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21635299     DOI: 10.1080/15326900701221454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  13 in total

1.  Children with specific language impairment and their contribution to the study of language development.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-07

Review 2.  Increasing the odds: applying emergentist theory in language intervention.

Authors:  Gerard H Poll
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in 3-Year-Old Children With Typical Language Development: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Patricia Deevy; Laurence B Leonard; Virginia A Marchman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A Clinical Evaluation of the Competing Sources of Input Hypothesis.

Authors:  Marc E Fey; Laurence B Leonard; Shelley L Bredin-Oja; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Fluency Bank: A new resource for fluency research and practice.

Authors:  Nan Bernstein Ratner; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in Preschool Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: A Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Patricia Deevy; Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Input Distribution Influences Degree of Auxiliary Use by Children with Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  Cogn Linguist       Date:  2011-04

8.  Input sources of third person singular -s inconsistency in children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Marc E Fey; Patricia Deevy; Shelley L Bredin-Oja
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-07-30

9.  The Changing View of Input in the Treatment of Children With Grammatical Deficits.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Evidence of compensatory processing in adults with developmental language impairment: testing the predictions of the procedural deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  Gerard H Poll; Carol A Miller; Janet G van Hell
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.