PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate endothelial function via fingertip reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) among heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), (ii) assess the effects of CRT on RH-PAT score, and (iii) investigate whether RH-PAT score can identify CRT response. METHODS: A total of 63 patients (61.8 ± 10.3 years; 50 males; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 24.3 ± 3.9%) with HF who received CRT were enrolled. Endothelial function via RH-PAT was assessed 1 day before and 6 months after CRT. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) was used to assess clinical improvements. CRT response was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥ 15% at 6 months. RESULTS: A RH-PAT score of < 1.7 signified a cut-off for endothelial dysfunction (ED). Baseline ED was observed among 43 (68.3%) patients and was more prevalent in responders (76.1% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.037). RH-PAT score improved 6 months after CRT (1.58 ± 0.35 vs. 1.71 ± 0.31, p = 0.012). A RH-PAT score of < 1.7 was a significant independent predictor of CRT response in multivariate logistic regression analysis (β = 1.275, OR = 3.512, 95% CI = 1.231-11.477, p = 0.032). The severity of ED was an independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling (β = -8.873, p = 0.015). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed moderate positive correlations between an improvement in RH-PAT (ΔRH-PAT) and LV reverse remodeling (r = 0.461, p = 0.001) and MLWHFQ score (r = 0.440, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ED detected via RH-PAT could predict the response to CRT. The RH-PAT score increased 6 months after CRT and was correlated with echocardiographic and clinical improvements.
PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate endothelial function via fingertip reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) among heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), (ii) assess the effects of CRT on RH-PAT score, and (iii) investigate whether RH-PAT score can identify CRT response. METHODS: A total of 63 patients (61.8 ± 10.3 years; 50 males; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 24.3 ± 3.9%) with HF who received CRT were enrolled. Endothelial function via RH-PAT was assessed 1 day before and 6 months after CRT. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) was used to assess clinical improvements. CRT response was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥ 15% at 6 months. RESULTS: A RH-PAT score of < 1.7 signified a cut-off for endothelial dysfunction (ED). Baseline ED was observed among 43 (68.3%) patients and was more prevalent in responders (76.1% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.037). RH-PAT score improved 6 months after CRT (1.58 ± 0.35 vs. 1.71 ± 0.31, p = 0.012). A RH-PAT score of < 1.7 was a significant independent predictor of CRT response in multivariate logistic regression analysis (β = 1.275, OR = 3.512, 95% CI = 1.231-11.477, p = 0.032). The severity of ED was an independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling (β = -8.873, p = 0.015). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed moderate positive correlations between an improvement in RH-PAT (ΔRH-PAT) and LV reverse remodeling (r = 0.461, p = 0.001) and MLWHFQ score (r = 0.440, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ED detected via RH-PAT could predict the response to CRT. The RH-PAT score increased 6 months after CRT and was correlated with echocardiographic and clinical improvements.
Authors: John Deanfield; Ann Donald; Claudio Ferri; Cristina Giannattasio; Julian Halcox; Sean Halligan; Amir Lerman; Giuseppe Mancia; James J Oliver; Achille C Pessina; Damiano Rizzoni; Gian Paolo Rossi; Antonio Salvetti; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Stefano Taddei; David J Webb Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Joseph G Akar; M Obadah Al-Chekakie; Tyler Fugate; Lynn Moran; Borislav Froloshki; Niraj Varma; Peter Santucci; David J Wilber; Martin E Matsumura Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Stuart D Katz; Katarzyna Hryniewicz; Ingrid Hriljac; Kujtim Balidemaj; Clarito Dimayuga; Alhakam Hudaihed; Aleksandr Yasskiy Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-01-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Piero O Bonetti; Geralyn M Pumper; Stuart T Higano; David R Holmes; Jeffrey T Kuvin; Amir Lerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Naomi M Hamburg; Michelle J Keyes; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Renate Schnabel; Moira M Pryde; Gary F Mitchell; Jacob Sheffy; Joseph A Vita; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eugene S Chung; Angel R Leon; Luigi Tavazzi; Jing-Ping Sun; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John Merlino; William T Abraham; Stefano Ghio; Christophe Leclercq; Jeroen J Bax; Cheuk-Man Yu; John Gorcsan; Martin St John Sutton; Johan De Sutter; Jaime Murillo Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jeffrey T Kuvin; Ayan R Patel; Kathleen A Sliney; Natesa G Pandian; Jacob Sheffy; Robert P Schnall; Richard H Karas; James E Udelson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.749