BACKGROUND: Digital pulse amplitude augmentation in response to hyperemia is a novel measure of peripheral vasodilator function that depends partially on endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Baseline digital pulse amplitude reflects local peripheral arterial tone. The relation of digital pulse amplitude and digital hyperemic response to cardiovascular risk factors in the community is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a fingertip peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) device, we measured digital pulse amplitude in Framingham Third Generation Cohort participants (n=1957; mean age, 40+/-9 years; 49% women) at baseline and in 30-second intervals for 4 minutes during reactive hyperemia induced by 5-minute forearm cuff occlusion. To evaluate the vascular response in relation to baseline, adjusting for systemic effects and skewed data, we expressed the hyperemic response (called the PAT ratio) as the natural logarithm of the ratio of postdeflation to baseline pulse amplitude in the hyperemic finger divided by the same ratio in the contralateral finger that served as control. The relation of the PAT ratio to cardiovascular risk factors was strongest in the 90- to 120-second postdeflation interval (overall model R(2)=0.159). In stepwise multivariable linear regression models, male sex, body mass index, ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and lipid-lowering treatment were inversely related to PAT ratio, whereas increasing age was positively related to PAT ratio (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Reactive hyperemia produced a time-dependent increase in fingertip pulse amplitude. Digital vasodilator function is related to multiple traditional and metabolic cardiovascular risk factors. Our findings support further investigations to define the clinical utility and predictive value of digital pulse amplitude.
BACKGROUND: Digital pulse amplitude augmentation in response to hyperemia is a novel measure of peripheral vasodilator function that depends partially on endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Baseline digital pulse amplitude reflects local peripheral arterial tone. The relation of digital pulse amplitude and digital hyperemic response to cardiovascular risk factors in the community is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a fingertip peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) device, we measured digital pulse amplitude in Framingham Third Generation Cohort participants (n=1957; mean age, 40+/-9 years; 49% women) at baseline and in 30-second intervals for 4 minutes during reactive hyperemia induced by 5-minute forearm cuff occlusion. To evaluate the vascular response in relation to baseline, adjusting for systemic effects and skewed data, we expressed the hyperemic response (called the PAT ratio) as the natural logarithm of the ratio of postdeflation to baseline pulse amplitude in the hyperemic finger divided by the same ratio in the contralateral finger that served as control. The relation of the PAT ratio to cardiovascular risk factors was strongest in the 90- to 120-second postdeflation interval (overall model R(2)=0.159). In stepwise multivariable linear regression models, male sex, body mass index, ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and lipid-lowering treatment were inversely related to PAT ratio, whereas increasing age was positively related to PAT ratio (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Reactive hyperemia produced a time-dependent increase in fingertip pulse amplitude. Digital vasodilator function is related to multiple traditional and metabolic cardiovascular risk factors. Our findings support further investigations to define the clinical utility and predictive value of digital pulse amplitude.
Authors: Joseph A Vita; John F Keaney; Martin G Larson; Michelle J Keyes; Joseph M Massaro; Izabella Lipinska; Birgitta T Lehman; Shuxia Fan; Ewa Osypiuk; Peter W F Wilson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Gary F Mitchell; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Noyan Gokce; John F Keaney; Liza M Hunter; Michael T Watkins; James O Menzoian; Joseph A Vita Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-04-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Helen Parise; Joseph A Vita; Martin G Larson; Elaine Warner; John F Keaney; Michelle J Keyes; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-07-12 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jeffrey T Kuvin; Ayan R Patel; Kathleen A Sliney; Natesa G Pandian; Jacob Sheffy; Robert P Schnall; Richard H Karas; James E Udelson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Renate T de Jongh; Erik H Serné; Richard G IJzerman; Greetje de Vries; Coen D A Stehouwer Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-05-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; Michelle J Keyes; Gary F Mitchell; Ramachandran S Vasan; John F Keaney; Birgitta T Lehman; Shuxia Fan; Ewa Osypiuk; Joseph A Vita Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-02-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Piero O Bonetti; Gregory W Barsness; Paul C Keelan; Theresa I Schnell; Geralyn M Pumper; Jeffrey T Kuvin; Robert P Schnall; David R Holmes; Stuart T Higano; Amir Lerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-05-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kathryn A Britton; Kenneth J Mukamal; Joachim H Ix; David S Siscovick; Anne B Newman; Ian H de Boer; Evan L Thacker; Mary L Biggs; J Michael Gaziano; Luc Djoussé Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Eleanor Lin; Danielle J Brick; Anu V Gerweck; Lindsey M Harrington; Martin Torriani; Bijoy J Thomas; David A Schoenfeld; Anne Breggia; Clifford J Rosen; Linda C Hemphill; Zida Wu; Nader Rifai; Andrea L Utz; Karen K Miller Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Katherine A Sauder; Cindy E McCrea; Jan S Ulbrecht; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Sheila G West Journal: Metabolism Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Jing Li; Andreas J Flammer; Martin K Reriani; Yoshiki Matsuo; Rajiv Gulati; Paul A Friedman; Randal J Thomas; Nicole P Sandhu; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman Journal: Circ J Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Boris Schnorbus; Robert Schiewe; Mir Abolfazl Ostad; Christoph Medler; Daniel Wachtlin; Philip Wenzel; Andreas Daiber; Thomas Münzel; Ascan Warnholtz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Daniel J Conklin; Suzaynn Schick; Michael J Blaha; Alex Carll; Andrew DeFilippis; Peter Ganz; Michael E Hall; Naomi Hamburg; Tim O'Toole; Lindsay Reynolds; Sanjay Srivastava; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.733