Literature DB >> 30446857

Toward the development of a comprehensive cancer experience measurement framework.

Carmen G Loiselle1,2, Doris Howell3, Irene Nicoll4, Margaret Fitch5.   

Abstract

A diagnosis of cancer and its treatment often have a profound impact on an individual's health-related quality of life-affecting physical, psychological, social, occupational, and financial domains. Person-centered care (PCC)-defined as a respectful, responsive, and tailored approach that meets patients' needs, values, and preferences-is becoming an integral part of comprehensive cancer care. The implementation of PCC into clinical practice provides benefits such as improvement in the quality of patient care, enhanced health-related outcomes, and significantly higher satisfaction with care. However, to guide and document more precisely the effects of PCC, various authors have argued that a more comprehensive measurement framework is needed. The primary goal of this paper is to present such an evolving framework based on extant evidence and developed in the context of a series of expert stakeholder meetings spearheaded by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) that began in 2012. Developed collaboratively, the Cancer Experience Measurement Framework goes beyond existing patient experience frameworks by focusing on four key elements and related measures: the patient perspective, the family perspective, the combined patient-family perspective, and interactions with the healthcare system. In light of current healthcare trends promoting cancer self-management, patients as partners, and patient and family engagement in care, it is imperative that we conduct ongoing assessments using shared and psychometrically sound measures to ensure sound comparisons across settings, as well as better cancer-related processes and outcomes for indivduals affected by cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer care; Measurement framework; Patient experience; Patient-reported outcomes; Person-centered care; Satisfaction with healthcare services

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30446857     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4529-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  21 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  An in-depth exploration of information-seeking behavior among individuals with cancer: part 1: understanding differential patterns of active information seeking.

Authors:  Sylvie D Lambert; Carmen G Loiselle; Mary Ellen Macdonald
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Health information seeking behavior.

Authors:  Sylvie D Lambert; Carmen G Loiselle
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2007-10

4.  Retooling for an aging America: building the healthcare workforce. A white paper regarding implementation of recommendation 4.2 of this Institute of Medicine Report of April 14, 2008, that "All licensure, certification and maintenance of certification for healthcare professionals should include demonstration of competence in care of older adults as a criterion.".

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts.

Authors:  Edward H Wagner; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Sarah M Greene; Leah Tuzzio; Cheryl J Wiese; Beth Kirlin; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-12

6.  The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Richard H Osborne; Gerald R Elsworth; Kathryn Whitfield
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-02-22

7.  The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

Authors:  M Stewart; J B Brown; A Donner; I R McWhinney; J Oates; W W Weston; J Jordan
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 8.  Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicola Mead; Peter Bower
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-09

9.  Supportive care framework.

Authors:  Margaret I Fitch
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2008

Review 10.  The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Carolyn C Gotay; Crissy T Kawamoto; Andrew Bottomley; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exploring the perspectives of patients about their care experience: identifying what patients perceive are important qualities in cancer care.

Authors:  Margaret I Fitch; Andrea C Coronado; Julia C Schippke; Jennifer Chadder; Esther Green
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The nurse pivot-navigator associated with more positive cancer care experiences and higher patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Carmen G Loiselle; Samar Attieh; Erin Cook; Lucie Tardif; Manon Allard; Caroline Rousseau; Doneal Thomas; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Denis Talbot
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  L'infirmière pivot associée à une expérience de soins oncologiques positive et à une satisfaction accrue des patients.

Authors:  Carmen G Loiselle; Samar Attieh; Erin Cook; Lucie Tardif; Manon Allard; Caroline Rousseau; Doneal Thomas; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Denis Talbot
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2020-01-01

4.  A catalyst for transforming health systems and person-centred care: Canadian national position statement on patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  S Ahmed; L Barbera; S J Bartlett; D G Bebb; M Brundage; S Bryan; W Y Cheung; N Coburn; T Crump; L Cuthbertson; D Howell; A F Klassen; S Leduc; M Li; N E Mayo; G McKinnon; R Olson; J Pink; J W Robinson; M J Santana; R Sawatzky; R S Moxam; S Sinclair; F Servidio-Italiano; W Temple
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Positive Cancer Experiences: Perspectives From Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Margaret I Fitch; Irene Nicoll; Gina Lockwood
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-07-17

6.  Patient Experience Monitor (PEM): The Development of New Short-Form Picker Experience Questionnaires for Hospital Patients with a Wide Range of Literacy Levels.

Authors:  Carla M Bastemeijer; Hileen Boosman; Linda Zandbelt; Reinier Timman; Dolf de Boer; Jan A Hazelzet
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2020-11-30

7.  Fit theory: A cancer experience grounded theory emerging from semi-structured interviews with cancer patients and informal caregivers in Manitoba Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Maclean Thiessen; Andrea Soriano; Jason Park; Kathleen Decker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Routes of administration, reasons for use, and approved indications of medical cannabis in oncology: a scoping review.

Authors:  Billy Vinette; José Côté; Ali El-Akhras; Hazar Mrad; Gabrielle Chicoine; Karine Bilodeau
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.