Literature DB >> 32489251

A catalyst for transforming health systems and person-centred care: Canadian national position statement on patient-reported outcomes.

S Ahmed1, L Barbera2, S J Bartlett1, D G Bebb2, M Brundage3, S Bryan4, W Y Cheung2, N Coburn3, T Crump2, L Cuthbertson4, D Howell3, A F Klassen3, S Leduc3, M Li3, N E Mayo1, G McKinnon2, R Olson4, J Pink2, J W Robinson2, M J Santana2, R Sawatzky4, R S Moxam3, S Sinclair2, F Servidio-Italiano3, W Temple2.   

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (pros) are essential to capture the patient's perspective and to influence care. Although pros and pro measures are known to have many important benefits, they are not consistently being used and there is there no Canadian pros oversight. The Position Statement presented here is the first step toward supporting the implementation of pros in the Canadian health care setting.
Methods: The Canadian pros National Steering Committee drafted position statements, which were submitted for stakeholder feedback before, during, and after the first National Canadian Patient Reported Outcomes (canpros) scientific conference, 14-15 November 2019 in Calgary, Alberta. In addition to the stakeholder feedback cycle, a patient advocate group submitted a section to capture the patient voice.
Results: The canpros Position Statement is an outcome of the 2019 canpros scientific conference, with an oncology focus. The Position Statement is categorized into 6 sections covering 4 theme areas: Patient and Families, Health Policy, Clinical Implementation, and Research. The patient voice perfectly mirrors the recommendations that the experts reached by consensus and provides an overriding impetus for the use of pros in health care. Conclusions: Although our vision of pros transforming the health care system to be more patient-centred is still aspirational, the Position Statement presented here takes a first step toward providing recommendations in key areas to align Canadian efforts. The Position Statement is directed toward a health policy audience; future iterations will target other audiences, including researchers, clinicians, and patients. Our intent is that future versions will broaden the focus to include chronic diseases beyond cancer. 2020 Multimed Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; Patient-reported outcomes; health policy; implementation science; patient experiences; patient-reported outcome measures; proms; pros

Year:  2020        PMID: 32489251      PMCID: PMC7253746          DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  41 in total

1.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Roxanne E Jensen; Ethan Basch
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Nan E Rothrock; Esi M DeWitt; Brennan Spiegel; Carole A Tucker; Heidi M Crane; Christopher B Forrest; Donald L Patrick; Rob Fredericksen; Lisa M Shulman; David Cella; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication.

Authors:  L Y Yang; D S Manhas; A F Howard; R A Olson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; David Feeny; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Daniel Kim; Justin Weinkauf; Dale C Lien
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Clifford A Hudis; Paul Sabbatini; Lauren Rogak; Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Thomas M Atkinson; Joanne F Chou; Dorothy Dulko; Laura Sit; Allison Barz; Paul Novotny; Michael Fruscione; Jeff A Sloan; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

Authors:  Theresa Weldring; Sheree M S Smith
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2013-08-04

9.  The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Anant Jani; Brigit A de Jong; Annemarie Becker; Margot J Metz; Martine C de Bruijne; Danielle R Timmermans; Martina C Cornel; Dirk T Ubbink; Marije van der Steen; Muir Gray; Carla van El
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 10.  A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.

Authors:  Jack Chen; Lixin Ou; Stephanie J Hollis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.

Authors:  Augusta Silveira; Teresa Sequeira; Joaquim Gonçalves; Pedro Lopes Ferreira
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.

Authors:  W Y Cheung; P Kavan; A Dolley
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  The use of patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care: preliminary insights from a multinational scoping survey of oncology practitioners.

Authors:  Yin Ting Cheung; Alexandre Chan; Andreas Charalambous; H S Darling; Lawson Eng; Lisa Grech; Corina J G van den Hurk; Deborah Kirk; Sandra A Mitchell; Dagmara Poprawski; Elke Rammant; Imogen Ramsey; Margaret I Fitch; Raymond J Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Priority recommendations for the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical cancer care: a Delphi study.

Authors:  C Mazariego; M Jefford; R J Chan; N Roberts; L Millar; A Anazodo; S Hayes; B Brown; C Saunders; K Webber; J Vardy; A Girgis; B Koczwara
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.442

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.