| Literature DB >> 30446681 |
Jesse Rijks1,2, Anita Vreugdenhil3,4, Elke Dorenbos1,2, Kylie Karnebeek1,2, Peter Joris2,5, Tos Berendschot6, Ronald Mensink2,5, Jogchum Plat2,5.
Abstract
To aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics of the retinal microvasculature, but particularly potential associations with classic and novel (endothelial function and low-grade inflammation)markers for cardiovascular risk, in a cohort of children with overweight and (morbid) obesity. Central retinal arteriolar equivalent(CRAE) and central retinal venular equivalent(CRVE) were assessed. CRAE was significantly lower and AVR significantly higher in children with morbid obesity than in children with overweight and normal weight(p < 0.01). CRVE did not differ significantly between the four weight categories. A multiple linear regression model with CRAE as dependent variable showed that only DBP z-score(β = -2.848,p = 0.029) and plasma glucose concentrations(β = 6.029,p = 0.019) contributed significantly to the variation in CRAE. Remarkably, despite a correlation between CRAE and circulating concentrations of the adhesion molecules VCAM-1 or ICAM-1, markers for inflammation and endothelial function did not contribute to the variation in CRAE. This is the first study showing in population of children with overweight and obesity that the retinal arteriolar microvasculature, but not venular diameter is aberrant, with increasing BMI z-score. CRAE was significantly associated with several cardiovascular risk markers, and multiple linear regression showed that a higher diastolic blood pressure z-score and lower fasting plasma glucose concentrations significantly contributed to the variance in CRAE.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30446681 PMCID: PMC6240121 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35279-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the study participants stratified by weight status category.
| Total (n = 226) | Overweight (n = 46) | Obesity (n = 104) | Morbid obesity (n = 76) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 13.0 (4.5–18.9)a | 12.2 (7.5–18.4) | 12.2 (6.8–18.1)d | 14.8 (4.5–18.9)d |
| Male/Female, % | 43/57 | 33/67 | 47/53 | 43/57 |
| Caucasian, % | 77 | 87 | 76 | 74 |
| BMI z score | 3.25 (1.17–5.28)b | 2.37 (1.17–2.92)e | 3.14 (2.53–3.87)e | 3.88 (3.37–5.28)e |
| Waist circumference z score | 5.2 (1.7–13.0)b | 3.6 (1.7–7.2)e | 4.8 (2.3–9.3)e | 7.0 (2.8–13.0)e |
| Hip circumference z score | 4.0 (0.6–10.5)b | 2.5 (0.8–5.1)e | 3.7 (1.2–6.2)e | 5.5 (0.6–10.5)e |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.91 (0.72–1.49) | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 0.9 (0.7–1.5) |
Data presented as mean ± SD or as median (minimum-maximum). Children were classified as overweight, obese, or morbidly obese based on the International Obesity Task Force criteria[34]. aStatistically different between the three weight status categories, p < 0.05; bStatistically different between the three weight status categories, p < 0.01; cStatistically different between children with overweight and children with morbid obesity, p < 0.0167; dStatistically different between children with obesity and children with morbid obesity, p < 0.0167; eStatistically different between all three weight status categories, p < 0.0167.
Retinal calibers of the study participants stratified by weight status category
| Normal weight (n = 15) | Overweight (n = 46) | Obesity (n = 104) | Morbid obesity (n = 76) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRAE, um | 157.4 ± 14.4a,b,c | 146.7 ± 14.7d | 143.4 ± 17.0e | 138.6 ± 16.0 |
| CRVE, um | 232.2 ± 10.3 | 228.5 ± 16.5 | 224.2 ± 22.8 | 226.9 ± 19.4 |
| AVR | 0.68 ± 0.06b,c | 0.64 ± 0.07d | 0.64 ± 0.07e | 0.61 ± 0.07 |
Data presented as mean ± SD. Children were classified as normal weight, overweight, obese, or morbidly obese based on the International Obesity Task Force criteria[34]. aStatistically different between children with normal weight and children with overweight (P < 0.05); bStatistically different between children with normal weight and children with obesity, P < 0.05; cStatistically different between children with normal weight and children with morbid obesity, P < 0.001; dStatistically different between children with overweight and children with morbid obesity, P < 0.017; eStatistically different between children with obesity and children with morbid obesity, P < 0.05.
Cardiovascular risk markers stratified by weight status category.
| Total (n = 226*; **) | Overweight (n = 46*; **) | Obesity (n = 104 *; **) | Morbid obesity (n = 76*; **) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.4 ± 0.8a | 4.3 ± 0.8c | 4.4 ± 0.8d | 4.7 ± 0.8c,d |
| LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.7 ± 0.7b | 2.4 ± 0.7c | 2.6 ± 0.7d | 2.9 ± 0.7c,d |
| HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.2 (0.5–2.6)b | 1.4 (0.8–2.6)c | 1.3 (0.6–2.1)d | 1.1 (0.5–1.8)c,d |
| Triacylglycerol, mmol/L | 1.04 (0.39–4.75)a | 0.95 (0.39–2.85)c | 1.03 (0.39–2.74) | 1.14 (0.42–4.75)c |
| Free-fatty acids, mmol/L | 0.64 (0.23–1.28) | 0.62 (0.23–0.98) | 0.66 (0.25–1.20) | 0.60 (0.28–1.28) |
| C-reactive protein, mg/L | 2.0 (1.0–38.0)b | 2.0 (1.0–7.0)c | 2.0 (1.0–38.0) | 4.0 (1.0–14.0)c |
| MCP-1, pg/mL | 127.6 (71.9–459.5) | 114.8 (83.4–396.5) | 129.1 (71.9–344.1) | 133.4 (74.0–459.5) |
| SAA, μg/mL | 2.4 (0.1–45.5) | 2.0 (0.4–8.6) | 2.1 (0.1–45.5) | 3.8 (0.6–21.0) |
| IL-6, pg/mL | 0.76 (0.00–3.66)a | 0.67 (0.32–1.42)c | 0.72 (0.19–3.66) | 0.97 (0.00–2.83)c |
| IL-8, pg/mL | 2.76 (0.88–21.42) | 2.86 (1.85–17.93) | 2.86 (0.88–17.32) | 2.40 (1.03–21.42) |
| E-selectin, ng/mL | 15.3 (1.7–45.1) | 15.3 (4.0–45.1) | 15.2 (4.9–40.1) | 15.5 (1.7–36.7) |
| ICAM-1, μg/mL | 469 (235–911) | 475 (304–742) | 474 (235–911) | 457 (302–676) |
| VCAM-1, μg/mL | 724 (453–1324) | 735 (530–1241) | 762 (453–1324) | 672 (471–981) |
| Systolic blood pressure z score | 0.35 ± 1.11b | −0.05 ± 1.11c | 0.29 ± 1.06 | 0.67 ± 1.10c |
| Diastolic blood pressure z score | −0.50 ± 1.14a | −0.78 ± 1.01c | −0.60 ± 1.12 | −0.19 ± 1.17c |
| Plasma glucose, mmol/L | 4.1 (2.5–5.9) | 4.1 (3.1–5.2) | 4.1 (2.8–5.8) | 4.2 (2.5–5.9) |
| Insulin, mU/L | 15.7 (2.0–158.0)b | 10.9 (2.0–30.3)c | 14.0 (2.4–111.2)d | 22.2 (5.1–158.0)c,d |
| HOMA-IR | 2.75 (0.43–25.98)b | 2.11 (0.43–5.12)c | 2.62 (0.43–19.27)d | 4.00 (0.94–25.98)c,d |
| HbA1c, % | 5.2 (4.1–6.1) | 5.2 (4.5–6.1) | 5.2 (4.1–6.0) | 5.3 (4.4–6.1) |
| Median sensor glucose, mmol/L | 5.0 (2.7–7.3) | 4.7 (2.7–6.9) | 5.0 (3.7–7.3) | 5.1 (3.6–6.0) |
| Maximum sensor glucose, mmol/L | 7.0 (5.6–10.8) | 7.4 (5.6–10.2) | 6.9 (5.7–10.8) | 7.4 (5.6–9.0) |
| Minimum sensor glucose, mmol/L | 3.4 (2.2–5.1) | 3.6 (2.2–4.3) | 3.2 (2.3–4.6) | 3.5 (2.2–5.1) |
| CONGA1 | 0.58 (0.28–1.09) | 0.62 (0.32–1.09) | 0.57 (0.28–1.06) | 0.58 (0.31–0.90) |
| CONGA2 | 0.72 (0.31–1.62) | 0.78 (0.36–1.62) | 0.72 (0.31–1.36) | 0.72 (0.39–0.99) |
| CONGA4 | 0.85 (0.35–2.06) | 0.89 (0.45–2.06) | 0.79 (0.35–1.72) | 0.88 (0.43–1.24) |
Data presented as mean ± SD or as median (minimum-maximum). Children were classified as overweight, obese, or morbidly obese based on the International Obesity Task Force criteria[34]. *MCP-1, SAA, IL-6, IL-8, E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured in a subgroup (total group n = 170; overweight n = 33; obesity n = 82; morbid obesity n = 55); **Sensor glucose concentrations and CONGA were measured in a subgroup (total group n = 73; overweight n = 14; obesity n = 31; morbid obesity n = 28). aStatistically different between the three weight status categories, p < 0.05; bStatistically different between the three weight status categories, p < 0.01; cStatistically different between children with overweight and children with morbid obesity, p < 0.0167. dStatistically different between children with obesity and children with morbid obesity, p < 0.0167. MCP-1 = monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; SAA = serum amyloid A protein; IL-6 = interleukin 6; IL-8 = interleukin 8; ICAM-1 = intracellular adhesion molecule 1; VCAM-1 = vascular cell adhesion protein 1; HOMA-IR = Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; CONGA = Continuous Overlapping Net Glycaemic Action; presented for 1, 2, or 4 h time differences.
Regression analysis for central retinal arteriolar and retinal venular equivalent.
| CRAE | CRVE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (μm per unit change) | (μm per unit change) | ||||||
| β (95% CI) | p-value | R2 | β (95% CI) | p-value | R2 | ||
| BMI z score | −2.489 (−6.037–1.059) | 0.168 | 0.153 |
| −2.814 (−7.198–1.570) | 0.207 | 0.028 |
| Plasma glucose, mmol/L | 6.029 (1.016–11.042) | 0.019 | 0.674 (−0.252–1.599) | 0.152 | |||
| LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | −2.913 (−6.234–0.408) | 0.085 |
| 0.701 (−0.197–1.598) | 0.125 | ||
| ICAM-1, μg/mL | 0.019 (−0.007–0.045) | 0.149 | 0.213 (−9.005–9.430) | 0.964 | |||
| VCAM-1, μg/mL | 0.006 (−0.013–0.025) | 0.509 | |||||
| Systolic blood pressure z score | −0.420 (−3.136–2.296) | 0.760 | |||||
| Diastolic blood pressure z score | −2.848 (−5.400–0.296) | 0.029 | |||||
Data represented as unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI); CRAE = central retinal arteriolar equivalent; CRVE = central retinal venular equivalent; ICAM-1 = intracellular adhesion molecule 1; VCAM-1 = vascular adhesion protein 1; HOMA-IR = Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance.