Dana Ragouzeos1, Julie Gandrup2, Beth Berrean3, Jing Li4, Marie Murphy5, Laura Trupin6, Jinoos Yazdany7, Gabriela Schmajuk8. 1. SOM Tech, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 654 Minnesota St, San Francisco, CA, 94107, United States. Electronic address: Dana.ragouzeos@ucsf.edu. 2. Division of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: julie.gandrup@gmail.com. 3. SOM Tech, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 654 Minnesota St, San Francisco, CA, 94107, United States. Electronic address: beth.berrean@ucsf.edu. 4. Division of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 270, San Francisco, CA, 94118, United States. Electronic address: jing.li2@ucsf.edu. 5. UCSF, PRL Institute for Health Policy Studies, 3333 California Street, Suite 265, San Francisco, CA, 94118, United States. Electronic address: Marie.murphy@ucsf.edu. 6. Division of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 270, San Francisco, CA, 94118, United States. Electronic address: Laura.trupin@ucsf.edu. 7. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94110, United States. Electronic address: Jinoos.yazdany@ucsf.edu. 8. Division of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, Veterans Affairs Medical Center-San Francisco, 4150 Clement St., Mailstop 111R, San Francisco, CA, 94121, United States. Electronic address: Gabriela.schmajuk@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Use of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in the routine care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been shown to improve health outcomes, However, integration of PROs into the clinical visit is inconsistent. We aimed to develop a "dashboard" for RA patients to display relevant PRO measures for discussion during a routine RA clinical visit. METHODS: Patients (N = 45) and providers (N = 12) were recruited from rheumatology clinics at a university center and a safety net hospital. Using a human-centered design process involving patients, clinicians, designers, and health-IT experts, we performed interviews, clinic observations, and focus groups, which subsequently guided an iterative phase of prototype testing. RESULTS: RA patients and their providers shared the goals of assessing wellbeing and developing a personalized treatment plan. We found conflicting views of which data were most important for guiding decision-making and for answering the patient's overarching question of "Am I OK?" CONCLUSION: The final dashboard simplified the display of PRO data and correlated it longitudinally to the patient's medication regimen. It also included laboratory values relevant for RA care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: By presenting data graphically, the dashboard may provide a platform for patients and providers to communicate around PROs and shared goals. Published by Elsevier B.V.
OBJECTIVE: Use of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in the routine care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been shown to improve health outcomes, However, integration of PROs into the clinical visit is inconsistent. We aimed to develop a "dashboard" for RApatients to display relevant PRO measures for discussion during a routine RA clinical visit. METHODS:Patients (N = 45) and providers (N = 12) were recruited from rheumatology clinics at a university center and a safety net hospital. Using a human-centered design process involving patients, clinicians, designers, and health-IT experts, we performed interviews, clinic observations, and focus groups, which subsequently guided an iterative phase of prototype testing. RESULTS:RApatients and their providers shared the goals of assessing wellbeing and developing a personalized treatment plan. We found conflicting views of which data were most important for guiding decision-making and for answering the patient's overarching question of "Am I OK?" CONCLUSION: The final dashboard simplified the display of PRO data and correlated it longitudinally to the patient's medication regimen. It also included laboratory values relevant for RA care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: By presenting data graphically, the dashboard may provide a platform for patients and providers to communicate around PROs and shared goals. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Eric D Newman; Virginia Lerch; Jon Billet; Andrea Berger; H Lester Kirchner Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Sherine E Gabriel; Cynthia S Crowson; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Michele F Doran; Carl Turesson; W Michael O'Fallon; Eric L Matteson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2003-01
Authors: Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen; Nicol Nijland; Maarten van Limburg; Hans C Ossebaard; Saskia M Kelders; Gunther Eysenbach; Erwin R Seydel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lucy H Liu; Sarah B Garrett; Jing Li; Dana Ragouzeos; Beth Berrean; Daniel Dohan; Patricia P Katz; Jennifer L Barton; Jinoos Yazdany; Gabriela Schmajuk Journal: Health Expect Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Hanneke Kip; Julia Keizer; Marcia C da Silva; Nienke Beerlage-de Jong; Nadine Köhle; Saskia M Kelders Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jutta G Richter; Gamal Chehab; Catarina Schwartz; Elisabeth Ricken; Monika Tomczak; Hasan Acar; Henrike Gappa; Carlos A Velasco; Peter Rosengren; Armanas Povilionis; Matthias Schneider; Jesper Thestrup Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 5.156