| Literature DB >> 30446004 |
Maria Angélica Martins Lourenço1, Mariana Gobbo Braz2, Aline Garcia Aun2, Bruna Letícia Buzati Pereira1, Fábio Henrique Fernandes3, Elisa Moya Kazmarek1, Tatiana Fernanda Bachiega1, Silmeia Garcia Zanati1, Paula Schmidt Azevedo1, Bertha Furlan Polegato1, Ana Angélica Henrique Fernandes4, Sergio Alberto Rupp de Paiva1, Leonardo Antonio Mamede Zornoff1, Marcos Ferreira Minicucci5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress is one potential mechanism that explain the direct effects of smoking on cardiac remodeling process. However, no study has compared different myocardial products of macromolecule oxidation after tobacco smoke exposure. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the lipid hydroperoxide (LH) levels, protein carbonyl concentrations and DNA damage in cardiac tissue of rats exposed to tobacco smoke.Entities:
Keywords: Cigarette smoke; Comet assay; DNA damage; Protein carbonyl groups
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30446004 PMCID: PMC6240305 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-018-0268-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ISSN: 2050-6511 Impact factor: 2.483
Morphological and Isolated heart study data
| C Group | ETS Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LVW/BW (mg/g) | 1.94 ± 0.25 | 2.07 ± 0.16 | 0.053 |
| RVW/BW (mg/g) | 0.48 (0.43–0.55) | 0.54 (0.45–0.96) | 0.328 |
| Lung weight/BW | 3.97 (3.85–4.07) | 5.13 (4.82–5.54) | < 0.001 |
| Liver weight/BW | 31.1 ± 3.2 | 30.1 ± 3.2 | 0.543 |
| -dP/dt (mmHg)a | 1896 ± 161 | 1958 ± 129 | 0.476 |
| +dP/dt (mmHg)a | 2521 ± 290 | 2563 ± 190 | 0.774 |
| Developed pressure (mmHg)a | 104.6 ± 6.8 | 108.3 ± 10.5 | 0.488 |
C control animals, ETS animals exposed to tobacco smoke, BW body weight, LVW left ventricular weight, RVW right ventricular weight, -dP/dt the maximum left ventricular pressure decrease rate, +dP/dt the maximum left ventricular pressure development rate
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or medians (including the lower quartile and upper quartile)
asample size n = 6 for C group and ETS group
Fig. 1Myocyte cross-sectional area (CSA) a. C group. b Exposed to Tobacco Smoke group. CSA was higher in ETS group compared to C group
Cardiac determination of protein carbonyl, lipid hydroperoxide and antioxidant enzyme system
| C Group | ETS Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein carbonyl (nmol/mg of protein) | 2.52 (1.70–3.18) | 3.10 (3.07–3.14) | 0.310 |
| LH (nmol/g) | 196.4 ± 51.5 | 331.9 ± 52.9 | < 0.001 |
C control animals, ETS animals exposed to tobacco smoke, LH lipid hydroperoxide
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or medians (including the lower quartile and upper quartile)
Comet assay
| Tail intensity (%) | C Group | ETS Group | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac Tissue | |||
| Buffer | 24.0 ± 10.6 | 18.9 ± 6.4 | 0.684 |
| FPG | 9.4 ± 4.8 | 10.4 ± 7.1 | 0.828 |
| Endo III | 6.6 (6.2–12.5) | 5.4 (4.8–14.2) | 0.400 |
| Blood | 22.5 ± 3.3 | 25.9 ± 8.4 | 0.485 |
C control animals, ETS animals exposed to tobacco smoke, FPG formamidopyrimidine glycosylase, Endo III endonuclease III
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or medians (including the lower quartile and upper quartile)
Fig. 2Comet assay. a Tail intensity in cardiac tissue from the C group. b Tail intensity in cardiac tissue from the ETS group. c Tail intensity in blood from the c group d. Tail intensity in blood from the ETS group. There were no differences between groups in the mean tail intensity in the blood or in the cardiac tissue