| Literature DB >> 25462161 |
Priscila P Santos1, Fernando Oliveira1, Vanessa C M P Ferreira1, Bertha F Polegato1, Meliza G Roscani1, Ana Angelica Fernandes2, Pamela Modesto1, Bruna P M Rafacho1, Silmeia G Zanati1, Annarita Di Lorenzo3, Luiz S Matsubara1, Sergio A R Paiva1, Leonardo A M Zornoff1, Marcos F Minicucci1, Paula S Azevedo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Experimental and clinical studies have shown the direct toxic effects of cigarette smoke (CS) on the myocardium, independent of vascular effects. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well known.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25462161 PMCID: PMC4252176 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Echocardiographic data.
| C (8) | CS (9) | p | |
|
| 19.0±1.67 | 19.5±1.41 | 0.552 |
|
| 7.71±0.80 | 8.99±1.30 | 0.030 |
|
| 3.22±0.34 | 3.42±0.44 | 0.312 |
|
| 0.34±0.05 | 0.35±0.04 | 0.800 |
|
| 10.3(10.1–10.7) | 11.1(10.6–12.6) | 0.038 |
|
| 0.52 (0.47–0.60) | 0.63(0.60–0.73) | 0.030 |
|
| 1.12±0.13 | 1.33±0.19 | 0.020 |
|
| 1.47±0.20 | 1.51±0.20 | 0.710 |
|
| 93.2 (92.1–94.4) | 90.1(86.7–92.9) | 0.048 |
|
| 59.3 (57.1–61.9) | 53.7 (49.0–58.8) | 0.048 |
|
| 1.52±0.28 | 1.63±0.2 | 0.322 |
|
| 51.8±5.39 | 53.0±9,50 | 0.781 |
|
| 58.4±13.0 | 51.1±7.89 | 0.176 |
LVDD: left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVSV: left ventricular systolic diameter; DPWT: diastolic posterior wall thickness; LVRWT: left ventricular relative wall thickness; LAD: left atrial diameter; LAA: left atrial area; RAA: right atrial area; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; FS: fractional shortening; EF: ejection fraction; E/A: waves E/A ratio; EDT: wave E decelerating time; IRTc: isovolumetric relaxation time corrected with cardiac frequency. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or the median (percentile 25–75). Significance level 5%.
Figure 1Energy Metabolism.
C: control group; CS: cigarette smoke group; LDH: lactate dehydrogenases C vs. CS p<0.001; 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA: 3-hydroxy acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenases C vs. CS p = 0.004; citrate synthase C vs. CS p = 0.008; cardiac TG: cardiac triacylglycerol C vs. CS p = 0.004.
Serum lipids.
| C (6) | CS (6) | P | |
|
| 88.5(85.9–90.5) | 150(140–162) | <0.001 |
|
| 97.7(95.8–98.4) | 188(160–210) | <0.001 |
|
| 26.0(23.9–27.4) | 122(100–146) | <0.001 |
|
| 17.7 (17.4–18.1) | 30.1(28.1–32.4) | <0.001 |
|
| 53.4±2.82 | 31.6±3.51 | <0.001 |
TG: triglycerides; LDL: low density lipoprotein; VLDL: very low density lipoprotein; HDL: high density lipoprotein. The data are expressed as the median and the percentile 25–75 or the mean ± standard deviation. Significance level 5%.
Figure 2Modulators of FA oxidation and mitochondrial biogenesis.
C: control group; CS: cigarette smoke group; O.D.: optical density; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; MW: molecular weight. 2A: upper bands: PPARα: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; lower-bands: GAPDH; PPARα/GAPDH: C vs. CS p = 0.6. 2B: upper bands: PGC-1α: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha; lower bands: GAPDH; PGC-1α/GAPDH: C vs. CS p = 0.5.
Oxidative Stress.
| C (6) | CS (5) | p | |
|
| 19.4±1.92 | 11.2±0.91 | <0.001 |
|
| 37.4±4.81 | 17.5±3.93 | <0.001 |
|
| 80.1±10.4 | 62.1±16.0 | 0.051 |
|
| 133±14.7 | 175±11.5 | <0.001 |
SOD: superoxide dismutase; GSH-PX: glutathione peroxidases; LH: lipid hydroperoxide. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Significance level 5%.
Figure 3Myocyte CSA.
C: control group; CS: cigarette smoke group; CSA: cross-sectional area C vs. CS p = 0.018.
Figure 4Apoptosis.
C: control group; CS: cigarette smoke group; O.D.: optical density; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; MW: molecular weight. Upper-bands: pro-Caspase and active Caspase subunits; lower bands: GAPDH; pro-Caspase/GAPDH C vs. CS p = 0.2; active-Caspase 3 (MW 19 kD) C vs. CS p = 0.04; active-Caspase 3 (MW 17 kD) p = 0.008.