Literature DB >> 30443803

A combined banding method that allows the reliable identification of chromosomes as well as differentiation of AT- and GC-rich heterochromatin.

Natalya A Lemskaya1, Anastasia I Kulemzina2, Violetta R Beklemisheva2, Larisa S Biltueva2, Anastasia A Proskuryakova2,3, John M Hallenbeck4, Polina L Perelman2,3, Alexander S Graphodatsky2,3.   

Abstract

Сonstitutive heterochromatin areas are revealed by differential staining as C-positive chromosomal regions. These C-positive bands may greatly vary by location, size, and nucleotide composition. CBG-banding is the most commonly used method to detect structural heterochromatin in animals. The difficulty in identification of individual chromosomes represents an unresolved problem of this method as the body of the chromosome is stained uniformly and does not have banding pattern beyond C-bands. Here, we present the method that we called CDAG for sequential heterochromatin staining after differential GTG-banding. The method uses G-banding followed by heat denaturation in the presence of formamide with consecutive fluorochrome staining. The new technique is valid for the concurrent revealing of heterochromatin position due to differential banding of chromosomes and heterochromatin composition (AT-/GC-rich) in animal karyotyping.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AT-rich; C-banding; Chromosome; Differential staining; G-banding; GC-rich; Heterochromatin composition; Karyotype; Сonstitutive heterochromatin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30443803     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-018-9589-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  37 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  F B Genest; P Morisset; R Patenaude
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Distribution of non-telomeric sites of the (TTAGGG)n telomeric sequence in vertebrate chromosomes.

Authors:  J Meyne; R J Baker; H H Hobart; T C Hsu; O A Ryder; O G Ward; J E Wiley; D H Wurster-Hill; T L Yates; R K Moyzis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes.

Authors:  M Seabright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Simultaneous G- and C- banding for human chromosomes.

Authors:  R S Verma; H Dosik
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Heterochromatin diversity in Cymbidium, and its relationship to differential DNA replication.

Authors:  D Schweizer; W Nagl
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1976-03-15       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Comparative Chromosome Map and Heterochromatin Features of the Gray Whale Karyotype (Cetacea).

Authors:  Anastasia I Kulemzina; Anastasia A Proskuryakova; Violetta R Beklemisheva; Natalia A Lemskaya; Polina L Perelman; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Analysis of mammalian proteins involved in chromatin modification reveals new metaphase centromeric proteins and distinct chromosomal distribution patterns.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Craig; Elizabeth Earle; Paul Canham; Lee H Wong; Melissa Anderson; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Mithramycin and DIPI: a pair of fluorochromes specific for GC-and AT-rich DNA respectively.

Authors:  W Schnedl; M Breitenbach; G Stranzinger
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1977-05-10       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Active centromere and chromosome identification in fixed cell lines.

Authors:  Thian T Beh; Ruth N MacKinnon; Paul Kalitsis
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Evolution of genome organizations of squirrels (Sciuridae) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting.

Authors:  Tangliang Li; Patricia C M O'Brien; Larisa Biltueva; Beiyuan Fu; Jinhuan Wang; Wenhui Nie; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.620

View more
  3 in total

1.  Karyotype Evolution in 10 Pinniped Species: Variability of Heterochromatin versus High Conservatism of Euchromatin as Revealed by Comparative Molecular Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Violetta R Beklemisheva; Polina L Perelman; Natalya A Lemskaya; Anastasia A Proskuryakova; Natalya A Serdyukova; Vladimir N Burkanov; Maksim B Gorshunov; Oliver Ryder; Mary Thompson; Gina Lento; Stephen J O'Brien; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Comparative Chromosome Mapping of Musk Ox and the X Chromosome among Some Bovidae Species.

Authors:  Anastasia A Proskuryakova; Anastasia I Kulemzina; Polina L Perelman; Dmitry V Yudkin; Natalya A Lemskaya; Innokentii M Okhlopkov; Egor V Kirillin; Marta Farré; Denis M Larkin; Melody E Roelke-Parker; Stephen J O'Brien; Mitchell Bush; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  New Data on Comparative Cytogenetics of the Mouse-Like Hamsters (Calomyscus Thomas, 1905) from Iran and Turkmenistan.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Vladimir G Malikov; Ahmad Mahmoudi; Feodor N Golenishchev; Natalya A Lemskaya; Jorge C Pereira; Vladimir A Trifonov; Natalia A Serdyukova; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Mansour Aliabadian; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.