Literature DB >> 30443393

Crystal structures of three halide salts of l-asparagine: an isostructural series.

Lygia S de Moraes1, Alan R Kennedy1, Charlie R Logan1.   

Abstract

The structures of three monohydrated halide salt forms of l-asparagine are presented, viz. l-asparaginium chloride monohydrate, C4H9N2O3 +·Cl-·H2O, (I), l-asparaginium bromide monohydrate, C4H9N2O3 +·BrH2O, (II), and l-asparaginium iodide monohydrate, C4H9N2O3 +·I-·H2O, (III). These form an isomorphous and isostructural series. The C-C-C-C backbone of the amino acid adopts a gauche conformation in each case [torsion angles for (I), (II) and (III) = -55.4 (2), -55.6 (5) and -58.3 (7)°, respectively]. Each cation features an intra-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bond, which closes an S(6) ring. The extended structures feature chains of cations that propagate parallel to the b-axis direction. These are formed by carb-oxy-lic acid/amide complimentary O-H⋯O + N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, which generate R 2 2(8) loops. These chains are linked by further hydrogen bonds mediated by the halide ions and water mol-ecules to give a layered structure with cation and anion layers parallel to the ab plane. Compound (III) was refined as an inversion twin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amino-acid; crystal structure; isostructural series; salt selections

Year:  2018        PMID: 30443393      PMCID: PMC6218909          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Changing the salt form of an organic material is a well known way of altering the material’s physical properties whilst retaining many of the chemical properties inherent to the organic fragment. Selection of the salt form with the most suitable properties is thus an important consideration in the development of pharmaceutical materials and indeed of other fine chemicals (Stahl & Wermuth, 2008 ▸; Bastin et al., 2000 ▸; Kennedy et al., 2012 ▸). Often, the main property of inter­est is solubility, but salt selection may also be used to alter properties such as crystal morphology, hygroscopicity or stability, as well as mechanical properties such as hardness and strength (Stahl & Wermuth, 2008 ▸; Sun & Grant, 2001 ▸; Hao & Iqbal, 1997 ▸; de Moraes et al., 2017 ▸). In short, any bulk property that depends in some way on the packing or on the inter­molecular forces within the crystalline array structure may be altered by changing the salt-forming counter-ion. Despite the common usage of salt selection strategies, our understanding of what effect on properties any particular change of counter-ion will have is extremely limited. This means, for example, that it is not currently possible to predict which salt form of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) will be the most soluble or have the best compaction properties. In this area, isostructural series of structures are especially inter­esting as they allow changes in properties to be related to changes in inter­molecular inter­action strength or type without the complication of changes to the overall gross structure (Galcera & Molins, 2009 ▸; Allan et al., 2018 ▸). Here we present the structures of three isostructural halide salts of l-asparagine, namely the monohydrates [HAsp][Cl]·H2O, (I), [HAsp][BrH2O, (II) and [HAsp][I]·H2O, (III), (HAsp = C4H9N2O3 cation). l-aspara­gine is a non-essential amino acid, the bioavailability of which is associated with altered rates of breast cancer progression (Knott et al., 2018 ▸).

Structural commentary

The crystals isolated from all three reactions of l-asparagine with HX (X = Cl, Br, I) solutions were found to be hydrated compounds with the formula [HAsp][X]·H2O with protonation occurring at N1 as well as at the carb­oxy­lic acid. The starting material used was labelled l-asparagine and in all cases the refined Flack parameter confirmed that, as expected, this is S-asparagine. Crystals (I), (II) and (III) were found to adopt the same space group and to have similar unit-cell dimensions. They thus represent an isostructural series, with the unit-cell dimensions increasing as expected in line with increasing halide ion size. The HAsp cations are found to have near identical geometries. All equivalent bond lengths are statistically similar and all cations adopt the same general conformation with both C=O units syn with respect to the NH3 group, see Figs. 1 ▸–3 ▸ ▸. There are some small differences within this general conformation. The largest of these differences occurs between the iodide salt and the others, as indicated by the torsion angles involving the NH3 group [N1—C2—C1—O1 (acid C=O) = 24.6 (2), 20.2 (5) and 12.5 (8) and N1—C2—C4—O3 (amide) 27.1 (2), 27.73 (5) and 33.38 (8)°, for Cl, Br and I respectively].
Figure 1

View of the contents of the asymmetric unit of (I). Non-H atoms are drawn as 50% probability ellipsoids and H atoms as spheres of arbitrary size.

Figure 2

View of the contents of the asymmetric unit of (II). Non-H atoms are drawn as 50% probability ellipsoids and H atoms as spheres of arbitrary size.

Figure 3

View of the contents of the asymmetric unit of (III). Non-H atoms are drawn as 50% probability ellipsoids and H atoms as spheres of arbitrary size.

Supra­molecular features

Isostructurality is also indicated by examination of the hydrogen bonding, Tables 1 ▸–3 ▸ ▸ and Fig. 4 ▸. The three compounds all make the same number and type of hydrogen bonds, with the main difference being the increasing D⋯A distances caused by the different anion sizes. Where A = X there is a 7.4 to 11.5% increase in D⋯A distance from Cl to I, whereas where A = O there is a smaller 0.6 to 4.0% increase. The only exception is the sole intra­molecular inter­action. The D⋯A distance of this NH3 to amide contact decreases by about 1.5% from Cl to I.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H1H⋯O3i 0.88 (1)1.66 (2)2.533 (2)172 (4)
N1—H1N⋯Cl10.91 (1)2.27 (1)3.1663 (17)166 (2)
N1—H2N⋯Cl1ii 0.89 (1)2.56 (2)3.2909 (17)140 (2)
N1—H2N⋯O30.89 (1)2.19 (2)2.809 (2)126 (2)
N1—H3N⋯O1W 0.90 (1)1.97 (1)2.867 (2)172 (2)
N2—H4N⋯Cl1iii 0.90 (1)2.89 (2)3.4056 (17)118 (2)
N2—H4N⋯O1iv 0.90 (1)2.21 (2)3.051 (2)156 (2)
N2—H5N⋯O1W v 0.88 (1)2.08 (1)2.949 (2)167 (2)
O1W—H1W⋯Cl1vi 0.87 (1)2.41 (1)3.2650 (18)169 (2)
O1W—H2W⋯Cl1vii 0.87 (1)2.40 (2)3.2184 (17)157 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H1H⋯O3i 0.88 (1)1.68 (2)2.543 (4)167 (6)
N1—H1N⋯Br10.90 (1)2.46 (2)3.314 (5)159 (4)
N1—H2N⋯Br1ii 0.89 (1)2.59 (3)3.408 (5)153 (4)
N1—H2N⋯O30.89 (1)2.30 (5)2.787 (6)114 (4)
N1—H3N⋯O1W 0.90 (1)1.99 (2)2.886 (4)173 (5)
N2—H4N⋯Br1iii 0.90 (1)2.95 (4)3.479 (4)119 (4)
N2—H4N⋯O1iv 0.90 (1)2.26 (3)3.081 (5)152 (4)
N2—H5N⋯O1W v 0.90 (1)2.07 (2)2.959 (6)170 (5)
O1W—H1W⋯Br1vi 0.88 (1)2.51 (2)3.362 (4)167 (5)
O1W—H2W⋯Br1vii 0.88 (1)2.61 (4)3.323 (4)138 (5)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) .

Table 3

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (III)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H1H⋯O3i 0.88 (1)1.71 (3)2.549 (6)160 (9)
N1—H1N⋯I10.912.653.528 (7)164
N1—H2N⋯I1ii 0.912.893.591 (8)135
N1—H2N⋯O30.912.112.766 (8)129
N1—H3N⋯O1W 0.912.032.905 (6)160
N2—H4N⋯I1iii 0.90 (1)3.07 (6)3.659 (5)125 (5)
N2—H4N⋯O1iv 0.90 (1)2.37 (4)3.171 (7)149 (6)
N2—H5N⋯O1W v 0.90 (1)2.12 (3)2.983 (9)160 (7)
O1W—H1W⋯I1vi 0.88 (1)2.68 (2)3.526 (8)164 (5)
O1W—H2W⋯I1vii 0.88 (1)2.76 (4)3.504 (7)143 (6)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) .

Figure 4

View of all the unique hydrogen-bonding contacts made by the contents of the asymmetric unit of (I).

The only HAsp to HAsp hydrogen bonds form the classic carb­oxy­lic acid to amide O—H⋯O + N—H⋯O heterodimer motif [R(8)2 2]. With two such contacts per cation, this motif generates a one-dimensional hydrogen-bonded chain running parallel to the b-axis direction, see Fig. 5 ▸. Additionally, each halide ion accepts five unique hydrogen bonds, two bonds from water mol­ecules, two from NH3 groups and one from NH2. The water mol­ecules donate two hydrogen bonds to the halide ions and accept two from the NH3 and NH2 groups. The water mol­ecules thus form fourfold nodes, as is typical for organic hydrates (Gillon et al., 2003 ▸; Briggs et al., 2012 ▸). These inter­actions combine to give the structure shown in Fig. 6 ▸ with alternating layers of organic cations and halide anions lying parallel to the ab plane.
Figure 5

Chain of cations in (II) propagating parallel to the b-axis direction via O—H⋯O and O—H⋯N carb­oxy­lic acid to amide hydrogen bonds.

Figure 6

Packing diagram of (III) as viewed down the a-axis direction.

Database survey

The only other known structure of a simple salt of S-asparagine is that of the nitrate (Aarthy et al., 2005 ▸). Here both the cations in a Z′ = 2 structure adopt different conformations from that found for the halides: compare N—CC—O(acid C=O) of −176.9 (6) and 173.2 (5)° and N—CC—O(amide) of −123.2 (7) and 77.0 (4)° with the equivalent values given above. The structures of two simple salts of racemic asparagine have also been reported. These are the nitrate and the perchlorate forms (Moussa Slimane et al., 2009 ▸; Guenifa et al., 2009 ▸). All these literature forms are anhydrous, but despite this difference and further differences in anion type and cation geometry, all form the same R(8)2 2-based, one-dimensional hydrogen-bonded chain motif seen in the halide salts (I), (II) and (III).

Synthesis and crystallization

Salt forms of l-asparagine were prepared by dissolving 29 mmol of the amino acid in 90 ml of distilled water. The solution was stirred and heated slightly until complete dissolution had occurred. The solution was then equally divided between three vials. To each vial was added 1 ml of concentrated acid, either hydro­chloric acid, hydro­bromic acid or hydro­iodic acid. The first crystals appeared after 24 h of sitting at room temperature. Crystals suitable for analyses [colourless prisms for (I), colourless tablets for (II) and colourless rods for (III)] were obtained directly from the mother liquors and were removed from these solutions just prior to data collection.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4 ▸. Structure solution for (III) was by substitution from the Br equivalent. All H atoms bound to C were placed in calculated positions and refined in riding modes. C—H distances were 0.99 and 1.00 Å for CH2 and CH groups respectively, with U(H)iso = 1.2U eq(C). With the exception noted below, all other H atoms were observed and positioned as found. For (I) these were refined isotropically, but for (II) restraints were required for the NH3 and OH2 atoms. For (III) all H atoms required restraints to be applied. N—H distances were restrained to 0.90 (1) Å and O—H distances to 0.88 (1) Å. U(H)iso = 1.2U eq of the parent atom. The exception was the NH3 group of (III). The best model involved treating this as a rigid tetra­hedral group and allowing only rotation around the C—N bond. For this group, U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(N). Compound (III) was refined as an inversion twin.
Table 4

Experimental details

 (I)(II)(III)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC4H9N2O3 +·Cl·H2OC4H9N2O3 ·Br+·H2OC4H9N2O3 +·I·H2O
M r 186.60231.06278.05
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21 Monoclinic, P21 Monoclinic, P21
Temperature (K)123123123
a, b, c (Å)5.0922 (1), 10.1450 (2), 8.1950 (2)5.2167 (2), 10.2784 (5), 8.3063 (4)5.3668 (5), 10.6744 (8), 8.4532 (6)
β (°)103.834 (2)103.606 (5)102.772 (8)
V3)411.08 (2)432.88 (4)472.28 (7)
Z 222
Radiation typeMo KαMo KαMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.444.723.37
Crystal size (mm)0.45 × 0.30 × 0.250.5 × 0.3 × 0.120.6 × 0.35 × 0.15
 
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur EOxford Diffraction Xcalibur EOxford Diffraction Xcalibur E
Absorption correctionMulti-scan [CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]Analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]Analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]
T min, T max 0.900, 1.0000.205, 0.4870.286, 0.612
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections4053, 2079, 20324320, 2232, 21185854, 2458, 2288
R int 0.0130.0320.039
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.6980.7000.702
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.022, 0.058, 1.070.028, 0.062, 1.030.029, 0.058, 1.02
No. of reflections207922322458
No. of parameters128128117
No. of restraints997
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinementH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinementH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.26, −0.200.60, −0.380.87, −0.65
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 897 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)Flack x determined using 908 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)Refined as an inversion twin
Absolute structure parameter−0.02 (2)−0.022 (11)−0.07 (4)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014 ▸), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, II, III, general. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603/hb7779sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603/hb7779Isup2.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) II. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603/hb7779IIsup3.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) III. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603/hb7779IIIsup4.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603/hb7779Isup5.cml Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603/hb7779IIsup6.cml Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014603/hb7779IIIsup7.cml CCDC references: 1873483, 1873482, 1873481 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H9N2O3+·Cl·H2OF(000) = 196
Mr = 186.60Dx = 1.508 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.0922 (1) ÅCell parameters from 3444 reflections
b = 10.1450 (2) Åθ = 3.3–29.7°
c = 8.1950 (2) ŵ = 0.44 mm1
β = 103.834 (2)°T = 123 K
V = 411.08 (2) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 20.45 × 0.30 × 0.25 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur E diffractometer2032 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tubeRint = 0.013
ω scansθmax = 29.8°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan [CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.900, Tmax = 1.000k = −14→13
4053 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
2079 independent reflections
Refinement on F2H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Least-squares matrix: fullw = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0331P)2 + 0.0289P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.058Δρmax = 0.26 e Å3
S = 1.07Δρmin = −0.20 e Å3
2079 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL-2014/7 (Sheldrick 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
128 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.029 (8)
9 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 897 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: −0.02 (2)
Hydrogen site location: mixed
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.36571 (8)0.90075 (4)0.92401 (5)0.02062 (13)
O11.1145 (3)0.51257 (16)0.77258 (18)0.0258 (3)
O20.8130 (3)0.48931 (15)0.52673 (18)0.0237 (3)
O30.8617 (3)0.83494 (16)0.56812 (17)0.0269 (3)
O1W1.1611 (3)0.58702 (15)1.1607 (2)0.0242 (3)
H1W1.275 (4)0.528 (2)1.142 (3)0.029*
H2W1.034 (4)0.532 (2)1.170 (3)0.029*
N10.8288 (3)0.71004 (16)0.8685 (2)0.0162 (3)
H1N0.699 (4)0.758 (2)0.902 (3)0.019*
H2N0.936 (4)0.764 (2)0.827 (3)0.019*
H3N0.927 (4)0.664 (2)0.957 (2)0.019*
N20.5625 (4)0.78473 (17)0.3247 (2)0.0218 (4)
C10.8969 (4)0.53507 (18)0.6792 (2)0.0153 (3)
C20.6864 (4)0.61977 (17)0.7318 (2)0.0140 (3)
H10.57030.55970.78130.017*
C30.5009 (4)0.69279 (18)0.5859 (2)0.0162 (3)
H20.39000.62780.50910.019*
H30.37650.74990.63040.019*
C40.6548 (4)0.77587 (19)0.4888 (2)0.0170 (4)
H1H0.936 (6)0.437 (3)0.503 (5)0.067 (11)*
H4N0.643 (4)0.8399 (19)0.266 (3)0.019 (6)*
H5N0.423 (4)0.736 (2)0.273 (3)0.023 (6)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.01624 (19)0.0241 (2)0.0209 (2)0.00077 (17)0.00325 (14)−0.00539 (18)
O10.0182 (7)0.0346 (8)0.0224 (7)0.0096 (6)0.0008 (5)−0.0059 (6)
O20.0211 (7)0.0281 (8)0.0204 (7)0.0067 (6)0.0020 (5)−0.0079 (6)
O30.0222 (7)0.0359 (8)0.0199 (7)−0.0128 (6)0.0000 (6)0.0078 (6)
O1W0.0252 (8)0.0200 (7)0.0270 (8)−0.0019 (6)0.0051 (6)−0.0003 (6)
N10.0150 (8)0.0182 (8)0.0156 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0040 (6)−0.0019 (6)
N20.0265 (9)0.0217 (8)0.0163 (7)−0.0029 (7)0.0034 (7)0.0011 (6)
C10.0149 (8)0.0149 (8)0.0168 (8)−0.0014 (6)0.0052 (6)0.0014 (6)
C20.0123 (8)0.0149 (8)0.0152 (8)−0.0006 (6)0.0039 (6)−0.0007 (6)
C30.0129 (8)0.0186 (8)0.0166 (8)0.0004 (7)0.0026 (6)0.0023 (7)
C40.0168 (8)0.0163 (8)0.0183 (8)0.0023 (6)0.0046 (7)0.0023 (6)
O1—C11.209 (2)N2—C41.317 (2)
O2—C11.305 (2)N2—H4N0.897 (12)
O2—H1H0.876 (13)N2—H5N0.882 (13)
O3—C41.251 (2)C1—C21.515 (2)
O1W—H1W0.869 (13)C2—C31.527 (2)
O1W—H2W0.868 (13)C2—H11.0000
N1—C21.493 (2)C3—C41.502 (3)
N1—H1N0.913 (13)C3—H20.9900
N1—H2N0.891 (13)C3—H30.9900
N1—H3N0.901 (12)
C1—O2—H1H110 (3)N1—C2—C3112.85 (15)
H1W—O1W—H2W97 (3)C1—C2—C3113.57 (15)
C2—N1—H1N107.3 (15)N1—C2—H1107.3
C2—N1—H2N108.8 (17)C1—C2—H1107.3
H1N—N1—H2N110 (2)C3—C2—H1107.3
C2—N1—H3N111.2 (16)C4—C3—C2112.56 (15)
H1N—N1—H3N109 (2)C4—C3—H2109.1
H2N—N1—H3N110 (2)C2—C3—H2109.1
C4—N2—H4N119.5 (15)C4—C3—H3109.1
C4—N2—H5N119.9 (17)C2—C3—H3109.1
H4N—N2—H5N121 (2)H2—C3—H3107.8
O1—C1—O2125.44 (17)O3—C4—N2123.25 (18)
O1—C1—C2122.06 (16)O3—C4—C3118.34 (16)
O2—C1—C2112.48 (15)N2—C4—C3118.40 (17)
N1—C2—C1108.17 (14)
O1—C1—C2—N124.6 (2)N1—C2—C3—C468.1 (2)
O2—C1—C2—N1−156.61 (16)C1—C2—C3—C4−55.4 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3150.72 (17)C2—C3—C4—O3−37.7 (2)
O2—C1—C2—C3−30.5 (2)C2—C3—C4—N2143.49 (18)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1H···O3i0.88 (1)1.66 (2)2.533 (2)172 (4)
N1—H1N···Cl10.91 (1)2.27 (1)3.1663 (17)166 (2)
N1—H2N···Cl1ii0.89 (1)2.56 (2)3.2909 (17)140 (2)
N1—H2N···O30.89 (1)2.19 (2)2.809 (2)126 (2)
N1—H3N···O1W0.90 (1)1.97 (1)2.867 (2)172 (2)
N2—H4N···Cl1iii0.90 (1)2.89 (2)3.4056 (17)118 (2)
N2—H4N···O1iv0.90 (1)2.21 (2)3.051 (2)156 (2)
N2—H5N···O1Wv0.88 (1)2.08 (1)2.949 (2)167 (2)
O1W—H1W···Cl1vi0.87 (1)2.41 (1)3.2650 (18)169 (2)
O1W—H2W···Cl1vii0.87 (1)2.40 (2)3.2184 (17)157 (2)
C4H9N2O3·Br+·H2OF(000) = 232
Mr = 231.06Dx = 1.773 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.2167 (2) ÅCell parameters from 3145 reflections
b = 10.2784 (5) Åθ = 3.2–29.8°
c = 8.3063 (4) ŵ = 4.72 mm1
β = 103.606 (5)°T = 123 K
V = 432.88 (4) Å3Tablet, colourless
Z = 20.5 × 0.3 × 0.12 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur E diffractometer2232 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2118 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.032
ω scansθmax = 29.8°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]h = −7→6
Tmin = 0.205, Tmax = 0.487k = −14→14
4320 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F2H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Least-squares matrix: fullw = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0274P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.062Δρmax = 0.60 e Å3
S = 1.03Δρmin = −0.38 e Å3
2232 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
128 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.019 (3)
9 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 908 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: −0.022 (11)
Hydrogen site location: mixed
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.36490 (6)0.90306 (8)0.92345 (4)0.01479 (13)
O11.1176 (6)0.5163 (3)0.7609 (4)0.0196 (7)
O20.8106 (6)0.4779 (3)0.5270 (4)0.0187 (7)
O30.8665 (6)0.8262 (3)0.5653 (4)0.0226 (7)
O1W1.1602 (8)0.5964 (4)1.1565 (6)0.0196 (9)
H1W1.274 (8)0.536 (4)1.147 (7)0.024*
H2W1.059 (10)0.541 (5)1.193 (7)0.024*
N10.8287 (9)0.7034 (5)0.8580 (6)0.0124 (9)
H1N0.716 (8)0.749 (4)0.903 (6)0.015*
H2N0.951 (8)0.757 (4)0.836 (6)0.015*
H3N0.932 (8)0.663 (5)0.947 (4)0.015*
N20.5699 (7)0.7822 (4)0.3244 (4)0.0169 (8)
C10.8998 (8)0.5314 (4)0.6731 (5)0.0124 (8)
C20.6900 (8)0.6143 (4)0.7242 (5)0.0109 (8)
H10.57650.55490.77290.013*
C30.5124 (8)0.6858 (4)0.5811 (5)0.0130 (8)
H20.40710.62150.50440.016*
H30.38840.74110.62430.016*
C40.6627 (8)0.7697 (4)0.4866 (5)0.0132 (8)
H1H0.938 (9)0.428 (5)0.509 (8)0.046 (18)*
H4N0.645 (9)0.837 (4)0.265 (5)0.016 (12)*
H5N0.431 (7)0.733 (4)0.276 (6)0.016 (14)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.01205 (18)0.01658 (19)0.01513 (18)0.0006 (2)0.00197 (12)−0.0034 (2)
O10.0120 (15)0.0263 (18)0.0185 (16)0.0072 (13)−0.0002 (13)−0.0061 (13)
O20.0148 (14)0.0238 (17)0.0159 (15)0.0046 (13)0.0003 (12)−0.0062 (13)
O30.0176 (16)0.0309 (19)0.0159 (15)−0.0127 (13)−0.0031 (13)0.0076 (14)
O1W0.015 (2)0.018 (2)0.025 (2)−0.0018 (17)0.0022 (16)0.0001 (17)
N10.013 (2)0.012 (2)0.012 (2)0.0026 (18)0.0035 (17)−0.0018 (17)
N20.0205 (19)0.0169 (18)0.0123 (17)−0.0031 (16)0.0013 (15)0.0014 (14)
C10.014 (2)0.0102 (18)0.0142 (19)−0.0021 (15)0.0056 (16)0.0019 (15)
C20.0072 (18)0.0129 (19)0.0124 (18)−0.0021 (15)0.0020 (15)−0.0005 (15)
C30.0092 (18)0.014 (2)0.016 (2)−0.0008 (16)0.0018 (16)0.0003 (16)
C40.0135 (19)0.0099 (19)0.0158 (19)0.0025 (16)0.0024 (16)0.0017 (15)
O1—C11.207 (5)N2—C41.326 (5)
O2—C11.314 (5)N2—H4N0.898 (14)
O2—H1H0.879 (14)N2—H5N0.897 (14)
O3—C41.252 (5)C1—C21.524 (6)
O1W—H1W0.875 (14)C2—C31.515 (6)
O1W—H2W0.879 (14)C2—H11.0000
N1—C21.490 (6)C3—C41.504 (6)
N1—H1N0.900 (14)C3—H20.9900
N1—H2N0.894 (14)C3—H30.9900
N1—H3N0.904 (14)
C1—O2—H1H106 (4)N1—C2—C1107.3 (3)
H1W—O1W—H2W93 (5)C3—C2—C1113.5 (3)
C2—N1—H1N112 (3)N1—C2—H1107.7
C2—N1—H2N118 (3)C3—C2—H1107.7
H1N—N1—H2N109 (5)C1—C2—H1107.7
C2—N1—H3N115 (4)C4—C3—C2113.0 (3)
H1N—N1—H3N102 (4)C4—C3—H2109.0
H2N—N1—H3N98 (5)C2—C3—H2109.0
C4—N2—H4N121 (3)C4—C3—H3109.0
C4—N2—H5N118 (3)C2—C3—H3109.0
H4N—N2—H5N121 (5)H2—C3—H3107.8
O1—C1—O2125.7 (4)O3—C4—N2123.2 (4)
O1—C1—C2122.6 (4)O3—C4—C3118.4 (4)
O2—C1—C2111.7 (4)N2—C4—C3118.4 (4)
N1—C2—C3112.8 (3)
O1—C1—C2—N120.2 (5)N1—C2—C3—C466.7 (5)
O2—C1—C2—N1−161.4 (4)C1—C2—C3—C4−55.6 (5)
O1—C1—C2—C3145.4 (4)C2—C3—C4—O3−35.7 (5)
O2—C1—C2—C3−36.1 (5)C2—C3—C4—N2145.6 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1H···O3i0.88 (1)1.68 (2)2.543 (4)167 (6)
N1—H1N···Br10.90 (1)2.46 (2)3.314 (5)159 (4)
N1—H2N···Br1ii0.89 (1)2.59 (3)3.408 (5)153 (4)
N1—H2N···O30.89 (1)2.30 (5)2.787 (6)114 (4)
N1—H3N···O1W0.90 (1)1.99 (2)2.886 (4)173 (5)
N2—H4N···Br1iii0.90 (1)2.95 (4)3.479 (4)119 (4)
N2—H4N···O1iv0.90 (1)2.26 (3)3.081 (5)152 (4)
N2—H5N···O1Wv0.90 (1)2.07 (2)2.959 (6)170 (5)
O1W—H1W···Br1vi0.88 (1)2.51 (2)3.362 (4)167 (5)
O1W—H2W···Br1vii0.88 (1)2.61 (4)3.323 (4)138 (5)
C4H9N2O3+·I·H2OF(000) = 268
Mr = 278.05Dx = 1.955 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.3668 (5) ÅCell parameters from 4015 reflections
b = 10.6744 (8) Åθ = 3.8–29.9°
c = 8.4532 (6) ŵ = 3.37 mm1
β = 102.772 (8)°T = 123 K
V = 472.28 (7) Å3Fragment cut from long rod, colourless
Z = 20.6 × 0.35 × 0.15 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur E diffractometer2288 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tubeRint = 0.039
ω scansθmax = 29.9°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.286, Tmax = 0.612k = −14→14
5854 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
2458 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0215P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.058(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.87 e Å3
2458 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.65 e Å3
117 parametersAbsolute structure: Refined as an inversion twin
7 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: −0.07 (4)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a two-component inversion twin.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.36921 (6)0.90844 (10)0.91430 (3)0.01907 (10)
O11.1192 (8)0.5186 (4)0.7440 (5)0.0243 (10)
O20.8070 (8)0.4561 (4)0.5384 (5)0.0258 (11)
H1H0.936 (10)0.415 (8)0.516 (7)0.031*
O30.8904 (9)0.7986 (4)0.5464 (5)0.0282 (11)
O1W1.1491 (15)0.6160 (6)1.1460 (9)0.0274 (16)
H1W1.253 (10)0.553 (4)1.143 (9)0.033*
H2W1.029 (9)0.575 (5)1.181 (8)0.033*
N10.8348 (14)0.6975 (7)0.8380 (8)0.0165 (16)
H3N0.93720.65460.92050.025*
H1N0.71720.74200.87730.025*
H2N0.93150.75080.79260.025*
N20.5817 (11)0.7743 (5)0.3201 (6)0.0224 (12)
H5N0.428 (7)0.740 (6)0.277 (8)0.027*
H4N0.636 (13)0.835 (5)0.262 (7)0.027*
C10.9010 (11)0.5232 (5)0.6669 (7)0.0161 (12)
C20.7013 (12)0.6073 (5)0.7127 (7)0.0155 (12)
H20.58820.55370.76400.019*
C30.5321 (12)0.6737 (6)0.5676 (7)0.0177 (12)
H3A0.43490.61000.49370.021*
H3B0.40740.72710.60670.021*
C40.6816 (11)0.7537 (6)0.4743 (7)0.0181 (12)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.01668 (17)0.01986 (16)0.01982 (16)0.0013 (3)0.00223 (11)−0.0036 (2)
O10.018 (2)0.029 (2)0.024 (2)0.009 (2)−0.0010 (17)−0.006 (2)
O20.016 (2)0.031 (2)0.029 (2)0.0061 (18)0.0031 (18)−0.0140 (18)
O30.023 (3)0.034 (3)0.024 (2)−0.011 (2)−0.0023 (18)0.011 (2)
O1W0.025 (4)0.022 (4)0.034 (3)−0.006 (3)0.003 (3)0.001 (3)
N10.013 (4)0.019 (4)0.018 (3)0.007 (3)0.005 (2)0.001 (3)
N20.025 (3)0.022 (3)0.019 (3)−0.003 (2)0.002 (2)0.002 (2)
C10.017 (3)0.013 (3)0.018 (3)0.001 (2)0.004 (2)0.003 (2)
C20.015 (3)0.015 (3)0.016 (2)−0.002 (2)0.003 (2)−0.001 (2)
C30.014 (3)0.018 (3)0.020 (3)0.002 (3)0.002 (2)0.001 (2)
C40.016 (3)0.016 (3)0.022 (3)0.002 (2)0.004 (2)0.001 (2)
O1—C11.209 (7)N2—C41.314 (7)
O2—C11.305 (7)N2—H5N0.900 (14)
O2—H1H0.876 (14)N2—H4N0.896 (14)
O3—C41.247 (7)C1—C21.513 (8)
O1W—H2W0.880 (14)C2—C31.529 (8)
O1W—H1W0.877 (14)C2—H21.0000
N1—C21.492 (9)C3—C41.509 (9)
N1—H3N0.9100C3—H3A0.9900
N1—H1N0.9100C3—H3B0.9900
N1—H2N0.9100
C1—O2—H1H106 (5)N1—C2—C3112.1 (5)
H1W—O1W—H2W98 (3)C1—C2—C3113.5 (5)
C2—N1—H3N109.5N1—C2—H2107.7
C2—N1—H1N109.5C1—C2—H2107.7
H3N—N1—H1N109.5C3—C2—H2107.7
C2—N1—H2N109.5C4—C3—C2113.1 (5)
H3N—N1—H2N109.5C4—C3—H3A109.0
H1N—N1—H2N109.5C2—C3—H3A109.0
C4—N2—H5N118 (5)C4—C3—H3B109.0
C4—N2—H4N124 (5)C2—C3—H3B109.0
H4N—N2—H5N117 (7)H3A—C3—H3B107.8
O1—C1—O2125.2 (6)O3—C4—N2123.1 (6)
O1—C1—C2122.9 (5)O3—C4—C3119.1 (5)
O2—C1—C2111.9 (5)N2—C4—C3117.8 (5)
N1—C2—C1107.9 (5)
O1—C1—C2—N112.5 (8)N1—C2—C3—C464.3 (7)
O2—C1—C2—N1−168.8 (5)C1—C2—C3—C4−58.3 (7)
O1—C1—C2—C3137.5 (6)C2—C3—C4—O3−27.3 (8)
O2—C1—C2—C3−43.9 (7)C2—C3—C4—N2153.8 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1H···O3i0.88 (1)1.71 (3)2.549 (6)160 (9)
N1—H1N···I10.912.653.528 (7)164
N1—H2N···I1ii0.912.893.591 (8)135
N1—H2N···O30.912.112.766 (8)129
N1—H3N···O1W0.912.032.905 (6)160
N2—H4N···I1iii0.90 (1)3.07 (6)3.659 (5)125 (5)
N2—H4N···O1iv0.90 (1)2.37 (4)3.171 (7)149 (6)
N2—H5N···O1Wv0.90 (1)2.12 (3)2.983 (9)160 (7)
O1W—H1W···I1vi0.88 (1)2.68 (2)3.526 (8)164 (5)
O1W—H2W···I1vii0.88 (1)2.76 (4)3.504 (7)143 (6)
  9 in total

1.  Compaction properties of L-lysine salts.

Authors:  C Sun; D J Grant
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Mixed Ca/Sr salt forms of salicylic acid: tuning structure and aqueous solubility.

Authors:  Pamela Allan; Jean Baptiste Arlin; Alan R Kennedy; Aiden Walls
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  42 salt forms of tyramine: structural comparison and the occurrence of hydrate formation.

Authors:  Naomi E B Briggs; Alan R Kennedy; Catriona A Morrison
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2012-07-17

4.  Lithol Red: a systematic structural study on salts of a sulfonated azo pigment.

Authors:  Alan R Kennedy; Heather Stewart; Katherine Eremin; Jens Stenger
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  Asparagine bioavailability governs metastasis in a model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Simon R V Knott; Elvin Wagenblast; Showkhin Khan; Sun Y Kim; Mar Soto; Michel Wagner; Marc-Olivier Turgeon; Lisa Fish; Nicolas Erard; Annika L Gable; Ashley R Maceli; Steffen Dickopf; Evangelia K Papachristou; Clive S D'Santos; Lisa A Carey; John E Wilkinson; J Chuck Harrell; Charles M Perou; Hani Goodarzi; George Poulogiannis; Gregory J Hannon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  dl-Asparaginium perchlorate.

Authors:  Fatiha Guenifa; Lamia Bendjeddou; Aouatef Cherouana; Slimane Dahaoui; Claude Lecomte
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-08-29

7.  dl-Asparaginium nitrate.

Authors:  Nabila Moussa Slimane; Aouatef Cherouana; Lamia Bendjeddou; Slimane Dahaoui; Claude Lecomte
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-08-19

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.