Literature DB >> 30440854

Electric Fields Induced By Transcutaneous And Intracranial Current Injections In The Rat Brain.

Ahmet S Asan, Sinan Gok, Mesut Sahin.   

Abstract

As a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and specifically the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has gained popularity in recent years for treatment of a wide variety of cognitive and neurological disorders. Recent studies have shown that TES can alter the motor cortex excitability. Animal studies to demonstrate the underlying mechanisms of TES are clearly lacking in literature. Clinical studies have agreed on the critical role of the current intensity and the montage of the electrodes for the treatment to be effective. In this study, we used a rat model for in vivo investigation of the vertical electrical (E) field distribution due to electrodes placed over the skin and through a craniotomy hole. A mono-phasic current pulse was used as a substitute for DC currents by taking advantage of primarily resistive properties of the brain tissue at low frequencies. The electrical potentials induced by the current pulses were recorded with penetrations at 0mm, 2mm, and 4mm away from the stimulation electrode. The results showed that the E-field was maximum immediately under the anodic electrode and decreased both in the vertical and horizontal directions rapidly by distance. The magnitude of the electric field varied from tens of mV/mm to a fraction of mV/mm by distance for a 100 μ A stimulus amplitude. The results also show that the E-field amplitudes and distribution strongly depend on whether the stimulus electrode is placed over the skin or into a craniotomy hole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30440854      PMCID: PMC7249233          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 2375-7477


  15 in total

1.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Maren S Nitsche; Cornelia C Klein; Frithjof Tergau; John C Rothwell; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  THE ACTION OF BRIEF POLARIZING CURRENTS ON THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE RAT (1) DURING CURRENT FLOW AND (2) IN THE PRODUCTION OF LONG-LASTING AFTER-EFFECTS.

Authors:  L J BINDMAN; O C LIPPOLD; J W REDFEARN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Masashi Inoue; Hiroki Akiyama; Jackie K Deans; John E Fox; Hiroyoshi Miyakawa; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Mikhail Lomarev; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Walter Paulus; Susanne Will; Andre Antunes; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Mechanisms underlying transcranial direct current stimulation in rehabilitation.

Authors:  N Roche; M Geiger; B Bussel
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-07-17

7.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas Radman; Raddy L Ramos; Joshua C Brumberg; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats.

Authors:  David Liebetanz; Reinhard Koch; Susanne Mayenfels; Fatima König; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modulation of Multiunit Spike Activity by Transcranial AC Stimulation (tACS) in the Rat Cerebellar Cortex.

Authors:  Ahmet S Asan; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

2.  Entrainment of cerebellar purkinje cells with directional AC electric fields in anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Ahmet S Asan; Eric J Lang; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.955

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.