| Literature DB >> 30429497 |
Bo Sun1, Aihong Zheng1, Min Jiang1, Shengling Xue1, Qiao Yuan1, Leiyu Jiang1, Qing Chen1, Mengyao Li1, Yan Wang2, Yong Zhang1, Ya Luo1, Xiaorong Wang2, Fen Zhang3, Haoru Tang4,5.
Abstract
The clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeat-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system has developed into a powerful gene-editing tool that has been successfully applied to various plant species. However, studies on the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to cultivated Brassica vegetables are limited. Here, we reported CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Chinese kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) for the first time. A stretch of homologous genes, namely BaPDS1 and BaPDS2, was selected as the target site. Several stable transgenic lines with different types of mutations were generated via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, including BaPDS1 and BaPDS2 double mutations and BaPDS1 or BaPDS2 single mutations. The overall mutation rate reached 76.47%, and these mutations involved nucleotide changes of fewer than 10 bp. The clear albino phenotype was observed in all of the mutants, including one that harbored a mutation within an intron region, thereby indicating the importance of the intron. Cleavage in Chinese kale using CRISPR/Cas9 was biased towards AT-rich sequences. Furthermore, no off-target events were observed. Functional differences between BaPDS1 and BaPDS2 were also assessed in terms of the phenotypes of the respective mutants. In combination, these findings showed that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis can simultaneously and efficiently modify homologous gene copies of Chinese kale and provide a convenient approach for studying gene function and improving the yield and quality of cultivated Brassica vegetables.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30429497 PMCID: PMC6235979 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34884-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A map of the constructed vector. (A) Schematic of the BaPDSs gene fragment indicating the sgRNA target site and sequence. indicates exon. indicates intron. (B) Gel electrophoresis of the recombinant plasmid of pSG-BaPDS and pCC. M, DL15000 marker. (C) Structure of the CRISPR/Cas9 binary vectors for Chinese kale transformation. The Cas9 cassette was driven by the 35S promoter, while sgRNA was controlled by the hU6 promoter. The 3 × Flag is a label which can be used to identify the transgenic plants. NLS, nuclear localization sequence.
Figure 2The procedure of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in Chinese kale. (A) Aseptic seedling culture, (B) pre-culture, (C) co-culture, (D) delayed screening, (E) resistance screening, (F) subculture.
Figure 3PCR detection of the hygromycin-resistant gene for the estimation of transformation efficiency. M: DL2000 maker; V1, V2: empty vector was used as a positive control; P: plasmid containing the vector and sgRNA also was used as a positive control; H,W: H2O and the gDNA of the wild-type was used as a negative control; 1–75: indicates the resistant plant line number. The arrow points to the aim band.
Primers used in the study.
| Primer names | Sequence of primers (5′-3′) | Aims |
|---|---|---|
| sgRNA- | GATGGAGATTGGTATGAAAC | Synthesis of the target site |
| sgRNA- | GTTTCATACCAATCTCCATC | |
| CCTGCAAAGCCTTTAAAAGTTGTCATT | Detection of the mutation in transgenic plants | |
| CCAAGTTCTCCAAATAAGTTCTGCACG | ||
| CCTGCAAAGCCTTTAAAAGTTGTGATC | ||
| GCTATAGAAGATAAGAGCCGAGCCT | ||
| Hyg-F | CGATTGCGTCGCATCGACC | Detection of the hygromycin resistance gene |
| Hyg-R | TTCTACAACCGGTCGCGGAG | |
| Off-target1-F | ATTCCTTGGAATTAGCTCTTCACTTGAC | Off-target analysis |
| Off-target1-R | GATGGGGACTCGAATCTTATCTGCC | |
| Off-target2-F | CAGGAATGCATGGGAAAGCATGAATG | |
| Off-target2-R | ATGATGCAACCGGGTAGTTTAATCG | |
| Off-target3-F | CATCATGAGTGGGGACAAGTTGTG | |
| Off-target3-R | TCAGCGTCCATGAGAGGTAAAGGG |
Percentage of transgenic plants examined with BaPDSs mutations in Chinese kale.
| Mutation gene | Number of mutants | Mutation rate (%) | Total number of strains detected | Total mutation rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 20.59 | 68 | 76.47 | |
|
| 10 | 14.70 | ||
|
| 28 | 41.18 |
Figure 4Analysis of the number and proportion of mutation sites in Chinese kale mutants. Mixed type means that one of the two genes is mutated at the target site and the other is mutated within an intron.
Figure 5CRISPR/Cas9 system-induced mutation detection in Chinese kale mutants. (A) BaPDS1 mutations at the target site; (B) BaPDS1 mutations within introns; (C) BaPDS2 mutations at the target site; (D) BaPDS2 mutations within introns. The target sequence is indicated in blue, the PAM sequence (NGG) is underlined in red, mutated bases are indicated in red font, the short line represents the deletion base, and the asterisks indicate the spacing between bases. i #, # number of base insertions. r #, # number of base replacements. d #, # number of base deletions. The number of identical mutations is indicated in parentheses. Mn contains strains M4, M7, M8, M9, M10, M11, M12, M13, M20, M23, M26, M31, M32, M33, M36, M37, M38, M41, M42, M44, M45, M48, M50, M55, M57, M60, M65, M70, M72, M73.
Figure 6The albino phenotype of the BaPDS mutants after transformation with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. (A) Non-transgenic plant; (B) Transgenic plants with an empty vector (containing T-DNA); (C) BaPDS1 and BaPDS2 double mutant at the target site; (D) BaPDS1 single mutant at the target site; (E) BaPDS2 single mutant at the target site; (F) BaPDS1 and BaPDS2 double mutants within the introns; (G) BaPDS1 single mutant within the introns; (H) BaPDS2 single mutant within the introns.
Figure 7Types and frequency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutations in Chinese kale. The graph includes the sequencing data of all of the mutants. The illustration on the left shows the types of mutations. The illustration on the right shows the frequency of the mutations of different lengths. X-axis: r #, the number of base replacements; c #, the base number of combined mutations; i #, the number of base insertions.
Potential off-target analysis.
| Target | Sequence | Mismatches | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target site | GATGGAGA | ||
| Off-target site1 | 4 | 0.0% | |
| Off-target site2 | 4 | 0.0% | |
| Off-target site3 | G | 3 | 0.0% |
The seed sequence is underlined.