Yojiro Yutaka1, Makoto Sonobe2, Atsushi Kawaguchi3, Masatsugu Hamaji4, Daisuke Nakajima4, Akihiro Ohsumi4, Toshi Menju4, Toyofumi F Chen-Yoshikawa4, Toshihiko Sato1, Hiroshi Date4. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan; Institute for Advancement for Clinical and Translational Science, Kyoto University, 54, Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan. Electronic address: mysonobe@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp. 3. Center for Comprehensive Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 67, Asahi-cho, Kurume city, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan. 4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In high-risk operable geriatric patients undergoing palliative sublobar resection (SR), noncancerous comorbidities may contribute to unfavorable outcomes. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the perioperative safety and long-term survival of palliative SR in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 232 patients (141 male, 91 female) aged ≥75 years who underwent surgical resection of clinical stage I lung cancer from 2006 to 2014. The patients were divided into two groups, lobectomy and SR, and preoperative comprehensive comorbidities were assessed using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) and compared between the two groups. The operative safety was compared using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Survival rates were calculated with a Kaplan-Meier model under propensity score matching, and prognostic factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Lobectomy was performed in 156 patients and SR in 76 (segmentectomy, n = 50; wedge resection, n = 26). Age (p = 0.0137), tumor size on computed tomography (p < 0.0001), central tumor location (p = 0.0008), and high ACE-27 scores (p = 0.0202) were significantly associated with selection of SR. No mortality occurred, and the incidence of Grade 3b or greater postoperative complications in lobectomy and SR was 5.1% and 5.3%, respectively. According to the analysis of propensity score-matched patients (n = 57, tumor size = 23 mm, and consolidation/tumor ratio = 83%), the 5-year survival rate in lobectomy and SR was 81.1% and 73.5%, respectively (p = 0.4374). The ACE-27 score was a more significant prognostic factor than the type of surgical procedure, as well as consolidation/tumor ratio and nodal metastatic status. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of preoperative comorbidities is a significant prognostic factor, and SR as a compromise surgical procedure may provide promising short- and long-term outcomes in selected geriatric patients with clinical stage I lung cancer.
OBJECTIVES: In high-risk operable geriatric patients undergoing palliative sublobar resection (SR), noncancerous comorbidities may contribute to unfavorable outcomes. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the perioperative safety and long-term survival of palliative SR in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 232 patients (141 male, 91 female) aged ≥75 years who underwent surgical resection of clinical stage I lung cancer from 2006 to 2014. The patients were divided into two groups, lobectomy and SR, and preoperative comprehensive comorbidities were assessed using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) and compared between the two groups. The operative safety was compared using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Survival rates were calculated with a Kaplan-Meier model under propensity score matching, and prognostic factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Lobectomy was performed in 156 patients and SR in 76 (segmentectomy, n = 50; wedge resection, n = 26). Age (p = 0.0137), tumor size on computed tomography (p < 0.0001), central tumor location (p = 0.0008), and high ACE-27 scores (p = 0.0202) were significantly associated with selection of SR. No mortality occurred, and the incidence of Grade 3b or greater postoperative complications in lobectomy and SR was 5.1% and 5.3%, respectively. According to the analysis of propensity score-matched patients (n = 57, tumor size = 23 mm, and consolidation/tumor ratio = 83%), the 5-year survival rate in lobectomy and SR was 81.1% and 73.5%, respectively (p = 0.4374). The ACE-27 score was a more significant prognostic factor than the type of surgical procedure, as well as consolidation/tumor ratio and nodal metastatic status. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of preoperative comorbidities is a significant prognostic factor, and SR as a compromise surgical procedure may provide promising short- and long-term outcomes in selected geriatric patients with clinical stage I lung cancer.