Kun Liu1, Chengya Huang1, Meiying Xu1, Jingxiang Wu1, Inez Frerichs2, Knut Moeller3, Zhanqi Zhao3,4. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. 3. Institute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710000, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To examine the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings on lung mechanics and oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients aged >65 years were randomly allocated into either the PEEP5 or the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) group (PEEPEIT). Each group underwent volume-controlled ventilation (tidal volume 6 mL/kg predicted body weight) with the PEEP either fixed at 5 cmH2O or set at an individualized EIT setting. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the arterial oxygen partial pressure to the fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2). The secondary endpoints included the driving pressure, and dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn). Other outcomes, such as the mean airway pressure (Pmean), mean arterial pressure (MAP), lung complications and the length of hospital stay were explored. RESULTS: The optimal PEEP set by EIT was significantly higher (range from 9-13 cmH2O) than the fixed PEEP. PaO2/FiO2 was 47 mmHg higher (95% CI: 7-86 mmHg; P=0.021), Cdyn was 4.3 mL/cmH2O higher (95% CI: 2.1-6.7 cmH2O; P<0.001), and the driving pressure was 3.7 cmH2O lower (95% CI: 2.2-5.1 mmH2O; P<0.001) at 0.5 h during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in the PEEPEIT group than in the PEEP5 group. At 1 h during OLV, PaO2/FiO2 was 93 mmHg higher (95% CI: 58-128 mmHg; P<0.001), Cdyn was 4.4 mL/cmH2O higher (95% CI: 1.9-6.9 mL/cmH2O; P=0.001), and the driving pressure was 4.9 cmH2O lower (95% CI: 3.8-6.1 cmH2O; P<0.001) in the PEEPEIT group than in the PEEP5 group. PaO2/FiO2 was 107 mmHg higher (95% CI: 56-158 mmHg; P<0.001) in the PEEPEIT group than in the PEEP5 group during double-lung ventilation at the end of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP values determined with EIT effectively improved oxygenation and lung mechanics during one lung ventilation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. 2019 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: To examine the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings on lung mechanics and oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients aged >65 years were randomly allocated into either the PEEP5 or the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) group (PEEPEIT). Each group underwent volume-controlled ventilation (tidal volume 6 mL/kg predicted body weight) with the PEEP either fixed at 5 cmH2O or set at an individualized EIT setting. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the arterial oxygen partial pressure to the fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2). The secondary endpoints included the driving pressure, and dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn). Other outcomes, such as the mean airway pressure (Pmean), mean arterial pressure (MAP), lung complications and the length of hospital stay were explored. RESULTS: The optimal PEEP set by EIT was significantly higher (range from 9-13 cmH2O) than the fixed PEEP. PaO2/FiO2 was 47 mmHg higher (95% CI: 7-86 mmHg; P=0.021), Cdyn was 4.3 mL/cmH2O higher (95% CI: 2.1-6.7 cmH2O; P<0.001), and the driving pressure was 3.7 cmH2O lower (95% CI: 2.2-5.1 mmH2O; P<0.001) at 0.5 h during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in the PEEPEIT group than in the PEEP5 group. At 1 h during OLV, PaO2/FiO2 was 93 mmHg higher (95% CI: 58-128 mmHg; P<0.001), Cdyn was 4.4 mL/cmH2O higher (95% CI: 1.9-6.9 mL/cmH2O; P=0.001), and the driving pressure was 4.9 cmH2O lower (95% CI: 3.8-6.1 cmH2O; P<0.001) in the PEEPEIT group than in the PEEP5 group. PaO2/FiO2 was 107 mmHg higher (95% CI: 56-158 mmHg; P<0.001) in the PEEPEIT group than in the PEEP5 group during double-lung ventilation at the end of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP values determined with EIT effectively improved oxygenation and lung mechanics during one lung ventilation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. 2019 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Authors: Andreas Güldner; Thomas Kiss; Ary Serpa Neto; Sabrine N T Hemmes; Jaume Canet; Peter M Spieth; Patricia R M Rocco; Marcus J Schultz; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Carlos Ferrando; Marina Soro; Carmen Unzueta; Fernando Suarez-Sipmann; Jaume Canet; Julián Librero; Natividad Pozo; Salvador Peiró; Alicia Llombart; Irene León; Inmaculada India; Cesar Aldecoa; Oscar Díaz-Cambronero; David Pestaña; Francisco J Redondo; Ignacio Garutti; Jaume Balust; Jose I García; Maite Ibáñez; Manuel Granell; Aurelio Rodríguez; Lucía Gallego; Manuel de la Matta; Rafael Gonzalez; Andrea Brunelli; Javier García; Lucas Rovira; Francisco Barrios; Vicente Torres; Samuel Hernández; Estefanía Gracia; Marta Giné; María García; Nuria García; Lisset Miguel; Sergio Sánchez; Patricia Piñeiro; Roger Pujol; Santiago García-Del-Valle; José Valdivia; María J Hernández; Oto Padrón; Ana Colás; Jaume Puig; Gonzalo Azparren; Gerardo Tusman; Jesús Villar; Javier Belda Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Inéz Frerichs; Marcelo B P Amato; Anton H van Kaam; David G Tingay; Zhanqi Zhao; Bartłomiej Grychtol; Marc Bodenstein; Hervé Gagnon; Stephan H Böhm; Eckhard Teschner; Ola Stenqvist; Tommaso Mauri; Vinicius Torsani; Luigi Camporota; Andreas Schibler; Gerhard K Wolf; Diederik Gommers; Steffen Leonhardt; Andy Adler Journal: Thorax Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Christian Karagiannidis; Andreas D Waldmann; Péter L Róka; Tina Schreiber; Stephan Strassmann; Wolfram Windisch; Stephan H Böhm Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Carlos Toufen Junior; Roberta R De Santis Santiago; Adriana S Hirota; Alysson Roncally S Carvalho; Susimeire Gomes; Marcelo Brito Passos Amato; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 10.318