Li-Wei Chen1,2, Shun-Mao Yang1,3, Ching-Chia Chuang1, Hao-Jen Wang1, Yi-Chang Chen1,4, Mong-Wei Lin5, Min-Shu Hsieh6, Mara B Antonoff7, Yeun-Chung Chang4, Carol C Wu8, Tinsu Pan9, Chung-Ming Chen10. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Biomedical Park Hospital, Zhubei City, Hsinchu County, Taiwan. 4. Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 8. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 9. Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. TPan@mdanderson.org. 10. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. chung@ntu.edu.tw.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-grade adenocarcinoma subtypes (micropapillary and solid) treated with sublobar resection have an unfavorable prognosis compared with those treated with lobectomy. We investigated the potential of incorporating solid attenuation component masks with deep learning in the prediction of high-grade components to optimize surgical strategy preoperatively. METHODS: A total of 502 patients with pathologically confirmed high-grade adenocarcinomas were retrospectively enrolled between 2016 and 2020. The SACs attention DL model was developed to apply solid-attenuation-component-like subregion masks (tumor area ≥ - 190 HU) to guide the DL model for predicting high-grade subtypes. The SACA-DL was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation and external validation in the training and testing sets, respectively. The performance, which was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), was compared between SACA-DL and the DL model without SACs attention (DLwoSACs), the prior radiomics model, or the model based on the consolidation/tumor (C/T) diameter ratio. RESULTS: We classified 313 and 189 patients into training and testing cohorts, respectively. The SACA-DL achieved an AUC of 0.91 for the cross-validation, which was significantly superior to those of the DLwoSACs (AUC = 0.88; P = 0.02), prior radiomics model (AUC = 0.85; P = 0.004), and C/T ratio (AUC = 0.84; P = 0.002). An AUC of 0.93 was achieved for external validation in the SACA-DL and was significantly better than those of the DLwoSACs (AUC = 0.89; P = 0.04), prior radiomics model (AUC = 0.85; P < 0.001), and C/T ratio (AUC = 0.85; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of solid-attenuation-component-like subregion masks with the DL model is a promising approach for the preoperative prediction of high-grade adenocarcinoma subtypes.
BACKGROUND: High-grade adenocarcinoma subtypes (micropapillary and solid) treated with sublobar resection have an unfavorable prognosis compared with those treated with lobectomy. We investigated the potential of incorporating solid attenuation component masks with deep learning in the prediction of high-grade components to optimize surgical strategy preoperatively. METHODS: A total of 502 patients with pathologically confirmed high-grade adenocarcinomas were retrospectively enrolled between 2016 and 2020. The SACs attention DL model was developed to apply solid-attenuation-component-like subregion masks (tumor area ≥ - 190 HU) to guide the DL model for predicting high-grade subtypes. The SACA-DL was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation and external validation in the training and testing sets, respectively. The performance, which was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), was compared between SACA-DL and the DL model without SACs attention (DLwoSACs), the prior radiomics model, or the model based on the consolidation/tumor (C/T) diameter ratio. RESULTS: We classified 313 and 189 patients into training and testing cohorts, respectively. The SACA-DL achieved an AUC of 0.91 for the cross-validation, which was significantly superior to those of the DLwoSACs (AUC = 0.88; P = 0.02), prior radiomics model (AUC = 0.85; P = 0.004), and C/T ratio (AUC = 0.84; P = 0.002). An AUC of 0.93 was achieved for external validation in the SACA-DL and was significantly better than those of the DLwoSACs (AUC = 0.89; P = 0.04), prior radiomics model (AUC = 0.85; P < 0.001), and C/T ratio (AUC = 0.85; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of solid-attenuation-component-like subregion masks with the DL model is a promising approach for the preoperative prediction of high-grade adenocarcinoma subtypes.
Authors: Ho Yun Lee; So Won Lee; Kyung Soo Lee; Ji Yun Jeong; Joon Young Choi; O Jung Kwon; So Hee Song; Eun Young Kim; Jhingook Kim; Young Mog Shim Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Prudence A Russell; Zoe Wainer; Gavin M Wright; Marissa Daniels; Matthew Conron; Richard A Williams Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: William D Travis; Elisabeth Brambilla; Masayuki Noguchi; Andrew G Nicholson; Kim R Geisinger; Yasushi Yatabe; David G Beer; Charles A Powell; Gregory J Riely; Paul E Van Schil; Kavita Garg; John H M Austin; Hisao Asamura; Valerie W Rusch; Fred R Hirsch; Giorgio Scagliotti; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Rudolf M Huber; Yuichi Ishikawa; James Jett; Montserrat Sanchez-Cespedes; Jean-Paul Sculier; Takashi Takahashi; Masahiro Tsuboi; Johan Vansteenkiste; Ignacio Wistuba; Pan-Chyr Yang; Denise Aberle; Christian Brambilla; Douglas Flieder; Wilbur Franklin; Adi Gazdar; Michael Gould; Philip Hasleton; Douglas Henderson; Bruce Johnson; David Johnson; Keith Kerr; Keiko Kuriyama; Jin Soo Lee; Vincent A Miller; Iver Petersen; Victor Roggli; Rafael Rosell; Nagahiro Saijo; Erik Thunnissen; Ming Tsao; David Yankelewitz Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Akihiko Yoshizawa; Noriko Motoi; Gregory J Riely; Cami S Sima; William L Gerald; Mark G Kris; Bernard J Park; Valerie W Rusch; William D Travis Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Ming-Sound Tsao; Sophie Marguet; Gwénaël Le Teuff; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Frances A Shepherd; Lesley Seymour; Robert Kratzke; Stephen L Graziano; Helmut H Popper; Rafael Rosell; Jean-Yves Douillard; Thierry Le-Chevalier; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Jean-Charles Soria; Elisabeth M Brambilla Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 44.544