| Literature DB >> 30424085 |
David Bento1,2, Raquel O Rodrigues3,4, Vera Faustino5, Diana Pinho6,7,8, Carla S Fernandes9, Ana I Pereira10,11,12, Valdemar Garcia13, João M Miranda14, Rui Lima15,16.
Abstract
Techniques, such as micropipette aspiration and optical tweezers, are widely used to measure cell mechanical properties, but are generally labor-intensive and time-consuming, typically involving a difficult process of manipulation. In the past two decades, a large number of microfluidic devices have been developed due to the advantages they offer over other techniques, including transparency for direct optical access, lower cost, reduced space and labor, precise control, and easy manipulation of a small volume of blood samples. This review presents recent advances in the development of microfluidic devices to evaluate the mechanical response of individual red blood cells (RBCs) and microbubbles flowing in constriction microchannels. Visualizations and measurements of the deformation of RBCs flowing through hyperbolic, smooth, and sudden-contraction microchannels were evaluated and compared. In particular, we show the potential of using hyperbolic-shaped microchannels to precisely control and assess small changes in RBC deformability in both physiological and pathological situations. Moreover, deformations of air microbubbles and droplets flowing through a microfluidic constriction were also compared with RBCs deformability.Entities:
Keywords: air bubbles; blood flow; deformation index; droplets; microfluidic devices; red blood cells
Year: 2018 PMID: 30424085 PMCID: PMC6187860 DOI: 10.3390/mi9040151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Techniques to measure RBC deformability under different diseased conditions.
| Measurement Technique | Human Diseases | Main Key Features | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micropipette aspiration | Sickle cell anemia, malaria | Enables accurate mechanical response of single RBCs, labor-intensive, time-consuming, and involves a typically difficult process of manipulation. | [ |
| Optical tweezers | Malaria, sickle cell anemia, diabetes mellitus | Ability to obtain a mechanical response of single RBCs down to the piconewton level; labor-intensive, time-consuming and special human technical skills are required. | [ |
| Atomic force microscopy | Cancer, spherocytosis, thalassemia, diabetes mellitus, sickle cell anemia | Ability to apply forces to RBC surfaces at the nanoscale level; labor-intensive; time-consuming, and requires expensive equipment. | [ |
| Microfluidic ektacytometer | Diabetes mellitus | Homogenous flow, ability to differentiate healthy and diseased cells, labor-intensive and time-consuming process. It is required to label the RBCs to identify them. This latter process may change the RBCs‘ mechanical properties. | [ |
| Microfluidic constriction channel | Diabetes mellitus, malaria, cancer, abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome | Reduced space, homogenous flow, label-free, ability to measure a large amount of cells in one single run, potential to precisely control and detect small deformability changes, needs a high-speed video microscopy system combined with an image analysis technique; blockage is likely to happen at constriction microchannels with dimensions similar to the RBC diameter. | [ |
Figure 1Blood flow and RBC deformability in microfluidic contractions at different geometries: (a) sudden contraction; (b) smooth contraction; and (c) hyperbolic contraction, adapted from [38].
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the deformation index (DI) and deformation ratio (DR) definition, adapted from [17].
Figure 3RBC deformability in a hyperbolic converging microchannel at two different regions (A) and (B) and flow rates (9.45 µL/min and 66.15 µL/min) (adapted from [40]).
Figure 4Individual RBCs’ (a) DI and (b) velocity flowing through a hyperbolic contraction microchannel for two different flow rates: 9.45 µL/min and 66.15 µL/min.
Figure 5RBCs flowing through a microchannel with (a) a smooth and (b) a sudden (or abrupt) contraction (adapted from [65]).
Figure 6Individual RBCs (a) DI and (b) velocity flowing through a smooth contraction microchannel for the same flow rate. The X axis correspond to the main flow direction.
Figure 7Individual RBCs (a) DI and (b) velocity flowing through a sudden contraction microchannel for the same flow rate. The X axis correspond to the main flow direction.
Figure 8DI measured at five different sections of the stenosed microchannel for different flow rates: (a) healthy ovine RBCs; and (b) particles mimicking rigid RBCs (arRBCs). Error bars represent a 95% confidence interval (adapted from [70]).
Figure 9RBCs flowing through (a) rectangular PDMS microcapillary (b) divergent region upstream of a rectangular PDMS microcapillary; and (c) micropillars, adapted from [31].
Figure 10Individual RBCs’ (a) DR and (b) velocity flowing through a rectangular PDMS microcapillary for the same flow rate. The X axis corresponds to the main flow direction.
Comparison of several cells deformability studies performed in microfluidic devices.
| Microfluidic Technique | Cell Types | Main Flow Phenomenon | Approach to Measure the Degree of Deformability | Main Advantages | Main Disadvantages | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluid-induced deformation channel | Human RBCs | Poiseuille flow | Homogenous flow; ability to measure large amount of cells in one single run. | The extensional flow is not homogenous; expensive micro-visualization equipment. | [ | |
| Fluid-induced deformation channel | Human&rabbit RBCs, WBCs | Extensional flow (hyperbolic channel) | Homogenous extensional flow; high-sensitivity tool; potential to precisely control&detect small deformability changes; ability to measure large amount of cells in one single run. | Expensive micro-visualization equipment. | [ | |
| Fluid-induced deformation channel | RBCs and WBCs | Extensional flow (cross slot channel) | Extensional flow; capacity to differentiate healthy and diseased cells; ability to measure large amount of cells in one single run. | Expensive micro-visualization equipment; the numerical models may need to be validated with in vitro experiments. | [ | |
| Fluid-induced deformation channel | RBCs | Poiseuille flow | Homogenous flow; ability to measure large amount of cells in one single run. | The extensional flow is not homogenous; expensive micro-visualization equipment. | [ | |
| Structure-induced deformation channel | RBCs | Poiseuille flow | Homogenous flow; ability to differentiate healthy and diseased cells. | Complex to control the flow; difficult fabrication; blockage is likely to happen; expensive micro-visualization equipment. | [ | |
| Structure-induced deformation channel | Cancer cells | Poiseuille flow | Homogenous flow; ability to differentiate healthy and diseased cells. | Complex to control the flow; difficult fabrication; blockage is likely to happen; expensive micro-visualization equipment. | [ |
Figure 11(a) Schematic representation of the microchannel contraction region and flow direction of a device to study gas embolisms [85]. The region of interest is indicated by a dotted rectangle; and (b) the mean deformation index of bubble flowing through the contraction region.
Comparison of several deformability studies performed in microfluidic devices for bubbles and droplets.
| Microfluidic Technique | Fluid | Main Flow Phenomenon | Configuration | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| parallel band/plate apparatus | Bubbles and drops | Shear flow | [ | |
| T-junction divergence | Bubbles and drops | Extensional flow | [ | |
| Fluid-induced deformation channel | Drops | Extensional flow (hyperbolic channel) | [ | |
| Fluid-induced deformation channel | Drops | Extensional flow | [ |