Emiel W A Visser1,2, Matěj Horáček1,2, Peter Zijlstra1,2. 1. Department of Applied Physics , Eindhoven University of Technology , 5600 MB Eindhoven , The Netherlands. 2. Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS) , Eindhoven University of Technology , 5600 MB Eindhoven , The Netherlands.
Abstract
Biopolymers such as DNA, RNA, and proteins exploit conformational changes to modulate their function. Although state-of-the-art single-molecule approaches enable identification of conformational states, the transition path and metastable intermediates often remain elusive because they occur on microsecond time scales. Here we introduce a method to probe conformational dynamics with microsecond integration times based on a heterodimer of plasmonic particles. By combining Brownian dynamics and electromagnetic simulations, we find that integration times of 1 μs can be routinely achieved, providing the capability to identify short-lived intermediates and transition paths at the single-molecule level in real-time. Importantly, plasmon rulers require no specialized equipment but can be probed on existing fluorescence microscopes equipped with a fast camera. The approach combines the advantages of fluorescent probes (zero-force, parallelization) and mechanical probes such as optical tweezers (continuous microsecond integration times). They offer a unique opportunity to study conformational dynamics and compare measurements to full-atom simulations, where computational demands limit the simulation time.
Biopolymers such as DNA, RNA, and proteins exploit conformational changes to modulate their function. Although state-of-the-art single-molecule approaches enable identification of conformational states, the transition path and metastable intermediates often remain elusive because they occur on microsecond time scales. Here we introduce a method to probe conformational dynamics with microsecond integration times based on a heterodimer of plasmonic particles. By combining Brownian dynamics and electromagnetic simulations, we find that integration times of 1 μs can be routinely achieved, providing the capability to identify short-lived intermediates and transition paths at the single-molecule level in real-time. Importantly, plasmon rulers require no specialized equipment but can be probed on existing fluorescence microscopes equipped with a fast camera. The approach combines the advantages of fluorescent probes (zero-force, parallelization) and mechanical probes such as optical tweezers (continuous microsecond integration times). They offer a unique opportunity to study conformational dynamics and compare measurements to full-atom simulations, where computational demands limit the simulation time.
Entities:
Keywords:
microsecond conformational dynamics; plasmon ruler; plasmonic particles; single molecule
Biopolymers like DNA,
RNA, and proteins form the basic machinery
of life.[1] After expression, these biopolymers
fold into a three-dimensional structure on submillisecond time scales,[2] and some undergo conformational changes in their
folded form in response to temperature, pH, ionic strength, or ligand
binding.[3−5] Mechanistic understanding of protein folding and
conformational dynamics is key to understanding molecular function
and has great potential impact in molecular biophysics, biochemistry,
and medicine. As such, the characterization and understanding of protein
folding is an active area of research.All-atom simulations
have predicted the mechanism and speed at
which selected proteins change conformation.[6] These simulations predict that the lifetime of a conformational
state is typically seconds or longer, but the transition between two
conformations involves barrier crossing that occurs on microsecond
time scales. Real-time measurements of these transition path times
are crucial because they contain information about the folding mechanism
itself and its event-to-event heterogeneity. Importantly, such real-time
microsecond measurements will enable a direct comparison with full-atom
simulations, where the total simulation time is often limited because
of computational demands.Conformational landscapes of individual
biopolymers have been studied
using single-molecule fluorescence techniques[7−9] and using mechanical
probes such as optical and magnetic tweezers,[10−12] tethered particle
motion,[13−15] and atomic force microscopy.[16] Recent single-molecule fluorescence measurements achieved microsecond
times by a photon-by-photon analysis of the fluorescence trajectories
and reported an estimate of the transition path time (< 20 μs)
for a small protein.[17,18] However, averaging over several
hundred single-molecule trajectories was required to overcome the
limited brightness and photostability of the fluorophores.Recently,
real-time measurements with microsecond integration times
were presented that resolved force-induced unfolding of a bacteriorhodopsin
by atomic force microscopy[19] and folding
of a DNA hairpin in optical tweezers.[10] In contrast to fluorescence measurements, these methods do not operate
under naturally occurring zero-force conditions and require micron-sized
or larger force probes that are attached to the biomolecule using
long compliant tethers. These factors complicate the interpretation
of experiments and are a topic of current research.[19,20] There is clearly a need for a single-molecule method to probe conformational
dynamics with a (real-time) microsecond temporal resolution under
zero-force conditions.Here, we propose such a method based
on a dimer of metal nanoparticles
(a plasmon ruler) (see Figure a). A conformational change of the tether molecule will modulate
the interparticle distance and shifts the plasmon resonance of the
dimer.[21,22] Recent work by Ye et al. demonstrates the
ability of plasmon rulers to measure the conformational dynamics of
a protein with 30 ms time resolution.[23] We numerically explore the limits of different plasmon rulers by
a combination of Brownian dynamics simulations and electromagnetic
modeling to show that a time-resolution of 1 μs can be routinely
achieved with commercially available particles. The temporal resolution
is mainly determined by the size of the tether particle, enabling
multiplexed measurements by varying the size and shape of the primary
particle. This new application of plasmon rulers combines the advantages
of fluorescent probes (zero-force conditions, wide-field imaging)
and force-based methods (continuous microsecond integration times),
paving the way to unravel the folding process and its heterogeneity
in real-time.
Figure 1
Plasmon rulers for the measurement of biopolymer conformational
dynamics and folding. (a) Schematic representation of the canonical
nanoruler geometry and the heterodimer geometry. Both systems are
formed by a surface immobilized primary particle that is linked to
a tether particle via a biomolecule. (b) Numerical simulation of the
evanescent field around a gold nanosphere and nanorod resonantly excited
at the (longitudinal) plasmon resonance. The evanescent field rapidly
decays from the surface of the particle, inducing distance-dependent
coupling between the particles. (c) Comparison of the scattering spectrum
of the nanoruler in the proximal and distal state. A change in the
interparticle separation leads to a change in the plasmon coupling
and concomitant plasmon shift. If the scattered intensity is recorded
at a single wavelength (black vertical line), a change in the distance
between the particle leads to a change in the scattered light intensity.
Bottom: distance-dependent signal expected for the plasmonic nanoruler
(red line, plotted is the plasmon shift for a 20 × 70 nm2 nanorod with a Ø 18 nm tether particle) compared to
a commonly used FRET pair (blue line, plotted is the FRET efficiency
for a Cy5–Cy3 FRET pair).
Plasmon rulers for the measurement of biopolymer conformational
dynamics and folding. (a) Schematic representation of the canonical
nanoruler geometry and the heterodimer geometry. Both systems are
formed by a surface immobilized primary particle that is linked to
a tether particle via a biomolecule. (b) Numerical simulation of the
evanescent field around a gold nanosphere and nanorod resonantly excited
at the (longitudinal) plasmon resonance. The evanescent field rapidly
decays from the surface of the particle, inducing distance-dependent
coupling between the particles. (c) Comparison of the scattering spectrum
of the nanoruler in the proximal and distal state. A change in the
interparticle separation leads to a change in the plasmon coupling
and concomitant plasmon shift. If the scattered intensity is recorded
at a single wavelength (black vertical line), a change in the distance
between the particle leads to a change in the scattered light intensity.
Bottom: distance-dependent signal expected for the plasmonic nanoruler
(red line, plotted is the plasmon shift for a 20 × 70 nm2 nanorod with a Ø 18 nm tether particle) compared to
a commonly used FRET pair (blue line, plotted is the FRET efficiency
for a Cy5–Cy3 FRET pair).So far, plasmon rulers have been used on millisecond-to-second
time scales to measure DNA stiffness,[24] drug response in cells,[25] and the kinetics
of enzyme-induced bending and cleavage of DNA.[26] These reports indicated that plasmon rulers reveal interparticle
distances with subnanometer resolution,[27] while providing a photostable optical signal. However, their applicability
to study microsecond processes in real-time remains unknown because
thermal fluctuations of the interparticle distance introduce signal
fluctuations at these short time scales. Here we explicitly simulate
these thermal fluctuations using Brownian dynamics simulations of
the plasmon-ruler; subsequent electromagnetic modeling extracts the
optical signal and noise as a function of particle shape and size.We compare two geometries, namely, the canonical plasmon ruler
formed by a dimer of spherical gold nanoparticles and a heterodimer
with a gold nanorod as primary particle[28] (see Figure a).
The primary particle in the canonical dimer is a 50 nm diameter gold
nanosphere, whereas the heterodimer is constructed around a 20 ×
70 nm2 gold nanorod. These particle sizes were chosen because
they exhibit a similar but large scattering cross section that enables
the use of very small tether particles. The enhanced electric fields
around the particles are shown in Figure b for excitation resonant with the plasmon.
The fields around the nanorod are significantly stronger than the
sphere, mainly because its longitudinal plasmon resonance occurs in
the near-infrared, away from the interband absorption of gold.The evanescent field rapidly decays from the surface of the particle,
inducing distance-dependent coupling between the particles. In that
sense, a plasmon ruler shares similarities with Förster resonance
energy transfer (FRET), where distance dependent dipolar coupling
between two fluorophores is exploited.[29] In Figure c, we
show the normalized plasmon shift for the heterodimer as a function
of particle-separation, calculated using the boundary element method
(BEM).[30,31] We compare this distance-dependent plasmon
shift to the distance-dependent FRET efficiency of the commonly employed
FRET pair Cy3–Cy5. It shows that the plasmon ruler is sensitive
to distance changes over a significantly larger range than a typical
FRET pair. This sensitivity range can be further tuned by modifying
the size of the primary particle, which modifies the decay length
of the near-field.[32]
Results
We first
investigate the conformational changes of a two-state
(open and closed) ssDNA tether of 50 nucleotides that can form a hairpin
structure as shown in Figure a. Later, we extend this to an arbitrary number of states.
In solution-phase experiments the small tethered sphere will diffuse
through the enhanced field and cause time-dependent shifts of the
plasmon resonance due to a fluctuating interparticle distance. The
change in the conformation of the tether leads to a change in the
confinement of the tethered sphere. Typically, for a shorter tether,
the time-averaged interparticle distance is reduced leading to a red-shift
of the plasmon resonance of the dimer. As shown in Figure c, we propose to probe these
plasmon shifts using a light source with a wavelength on the red wing
of the plasmon so that shifts of the plasmon resonance are translated
to changes in the scattered intensity.[33] This makes the proposed experimental method directly compatible
with any existing fluorescence microscope, with the main difference
that we detect elastic scattering instead of the Stokes-shifted emission.
Figure 2
(a) ssDNA
molecule with a sequence that can form a DNA hairpin
structure. (b) The position distribution described by the calculated
potential E of the tether particle, here plotted
for the heterodimer in the open conformation. The dashed lines indicate
the size of the particles used in the simulation. (c) The probability P gets more confined as the hairpin closes, leading a decrease
in the average interparticle distance. This results in stronger plasmonic
coupling between the particles and a red-shift of the plasmon as illustrated
in Figure c.
(a) ssDNA
molecule with a sequence that can form a DNA hairpin
structure. (b) The position distribution described by the calculated
potential E of the tether particle, here plotted
for the heterodimer in the open conformation. The dashed lines indicate
the size of the particles used in the simulation. (c) The probability P gets more confined as the hairpin closes, leading a decrease
in the average interparticle distance. This results in stronger plasmonic
coupling between the particles and a red-shift of the plasmon as illustrated
in Figure c.The detectability of a conformational
change is then quantified
by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The number of detected photons N(t) exhibits a mean and standard deviation:
μ ± σ. If the state of the system in Figure changes between open and closed, or vice
versa, this is observed as a change in the signal intensity:with a compound deviation:We define the SNR
as the ratio between the change in the mean intensity
Δμ and the compound noise
σtot:To determine the SNR with which we
can probe conformational dynamics
we then need to find μ and
μ, as well as their standard
deviations σopen and σclosed. We
used a numerical approach to simulate the optical signal generated
by the dimer. The approach consists of three steps: (1) we calculate
the Brownian motion trajectory of the particle attached via a tether
with a certain contour and persistence length. (2) The scattering
spectrum corresponding to each position of the tether particle is
calculated using the boundary element method (BEM). (3) The resulting
time-dependent optical signal is calculated using specific experimental
parameters such as probe wavelength, integration time, and collection
efficiency of the setup. We shortly describe each step below, and
elaborate descriptions can be found in the Supporting Information.In the first step, we determine the configuration
space (i.e.,
the position distribution) of the tether particle using a Monte Carlo
simulation method.[34] Herein the tether
was attached to the side of the primary particle, and a Kratky–Porod
chain was built segment by segment. The open state of the tether was
modeled as 50 nucleotides ssDNA linked to the particles via a polyethylene
glycol linker, i.e. PEG–ssDNA–PEG with the appropriate
segment and persistence length for each component. The PEG components
are neutral in charge and have a total contour length of 10 nm. In
the closed state, we assumed that the stem (in red in Figure a) is far more rigid than the
single-stranded portions of the strand, so that the particle-dynamics
is determined by the 7 nucleotide single-stranded part (in blue in Figure a).[35,36] This means that the effective contour length of the DNA changes
from 31.5 to 4.4 nm upon state switching. The design of the hairpin
is based on systems studied using FRET with a few extra nucleotides
to act as a spacer between the hairpin and the plasmon ruler.[37]From the position distribution for the
open and closed states,
we determined an effective potential E that describes
the confinement experienced by the particle due to the tether and
the nearby interfaces. This potential is plotted for the open conformation
in Figure b, where
we find a probability distribution with sharp boundaries dictated
by the particle surface and underlying substrate. At physiological
ionic strength the Debye length is <1 nm, indicating that electrostatic
interactions between the PEGylated particles and between a PEGylated
particle and the ssDNA are effectively shielded. The maximum excursion
of the tether particle is therefore determined by the contour length
of the tether. The Brownian motion trajectory of the tether particle
(sketched in Figure c) within this potential E was simulated using Brownian
dynamics simulations, yielding the tether particle’s position
over time.[38]In the second step,
we perform electromagnetic simulations to account
for the fact that the scattering cross-section of the dimer depends
on the position of the tether particle relative to the primary particle.
Using BEM simulations,[31] we calculated
the dimer’s scattering cross-section for a linearly polarized
probe for a grid of coordinates covering the 3D position of the tether
particle. The Brownian motion trajectories obtained in step (1) were
then used to obtain the scattering cross-section of the nanoruler
as a function of time σscat(t,λprobe). We then calculate the detected number of photons N(t) by taking into account the incoming
photon flux, the collection efficiency of the setup (ηdet = 0.05), the integration time, and shot noise. The absorption and
scattering cross sections are determined for each geometry separately.
The photon flux of the illumination light was chosen to limit the
temperature-rise on the surface of the nanoruler to 2 K (see Supporting Note 6). This minimizes thermal effects
on the biomolecule and leads to negligible changes in the diffusion
coefficient of the particles. The result of this step is the detected
optical signal including all relevant noise sources. Experimental
observation of the angular orientation of gold nanoparticles at microsecond
integration times have been demonstrated, where similar photon fluxes
were employed.[39]Representative calculated
timetraces for three different integration
times are shown in Figure a–c for a tether particle size of 20 nm. The timetraces
show the signals in the open and closed state, with an instantaneous
transition at t = 1 ms. These simulations reveal
three regimes: (1) for short integration times (Figure a), shot noise is the predominant contribution
to the SNR. (2) For intermediate integration times (Figure b), the shot noise is similar
in magnitude to the fluctuations induced by the Brownian motion of
the tether particle (Brownian noise). (3) For longer integration times
(Figure c), the Brownian
noise is dominant over shot noise and gets averaged out leading to
an increase in SNR with integration time.
Figure 3
(a–c) Normalized
detector signal N(t)/N0 for a heterodimer (20
× 70 nm2 rod, sphere Ø 20 nm) as a function of
time for three different integration times tint (a) 0.01 μs–in the shot noise limited regime,
(b) 1 μs–in the intermediate regime, (c) 50 μs–in
the Brownian noise limited regime. The signal due to the Brownian
motion and plasmonic coupling is shown in red, and the signal with
shot noise added is shown in blue. The first millisecond shows the
signal of the system in the open state, the second millisecond in
the closed state. (d) The SNR of the detection of a state change between
the open and closed state as a function of the integration time for
particle diameters of 5, 10, 14, 18, and 20 nm. The time needed by
the tether particle to explore the available space in the open state,
τp, is shown as open circles (see text for more details).
(a–c) Normalized
detector signal N(t)/N0 for a heterodimer (20
× 70 nm2 rod, sphere Ø 20 nm) as a function of
time for three different integration times tint (a) 0.01 μs–in the shot noise limited regime,
(b) 1 μs–in the intermediate regime, (c) 50 μs–in
the Brownian noise limited regime. The signal due to the Brownian
motion and plasmonic coupling is shown in red, and the signal with
shot noise added is shown in blue. The first millisecond shows the
signal of the system in the open state, the second millisecond in
the closed state. (d) The SNR of the detection of a state change between
the open and closed state as a function of the integration time for
particle diameters of 5, 10, 14, 18, and 20 nm. The time needed by
the tether particle to explore the available space in the open state,
τp, is shown as open circles (see text for more details).These three regimes are also recognized
in Figure d, where
we show the SNR as a function of tint for
different tether particle sizes. For
the 5 nm tether particle, shot noise is dominant across all tint because the plasmon shift is small upon
interparticle distance changes, leading to the expected scaling of
the SNR as . The plasmon shift increases with tether
particle size, and for tether particles larger than 10 nm a transition
between the shot noise limited regime and regime limited by Brownian
noise is observed for integration times between 0.2 and 2 μs.
With larger tether particle sizes (14, 18, 20 nm in diameter), shot
noise becomes less significant and the transition to the shot noise
dominated regime occurs at shorter tint.The characteristic time at which the tether particle explores
all
tether configurations defines the ultimate temporal resolution of
the plasmon ruler. We will refer to this time as the characteristic
time of the plasmon ruler, τp. We quantify τp by considering the autocorrelation function of the detector
signal, which was fitted with a single exponential decay to yield
the characteristic correlation time τp (see Supporting Note 7). Two major contributions determine
τp: the diffusion constant of the particle and the
length of the molecular tether. The open circles in Figure d show the SNR at an integration
time equal to τp of the open state. Note that τp in the closed state is shorter, but the longer correlation
time determines the shortest accessible time scales. We find a clear
trade-off between the SNR and τp because the smaller
tether-particles diffuse faster but generate a smaller plasmon shift
upon conformational changes. Crucially, the heterodimer enables the
observation of conformational changes of ssDNA hairpins with SNR ∼
3 with continuous submicrosecond integration times.We now consider
the potential for wavelength-multiplexed measurements.
A clear move toward multiplexed studies is currently observed for
FRET based sensors, for example to study multiple and correlated molecular
events in life cell studies.[40] To construct
plasmon rulers with different center wavelengths, we exploit the fact
that the plasmon wavelength of the ruler is largely determined by
the size, shape, and material of the primary particle.[41] We demonstrate the ability to multiplex by considering
a dimer of two spherical particles, whose plasmon wavelength occurs
around 580 nm. The primary particle of diameter 50 nm is bound to
the substrate and a tether particle (diameter 10–50 nm) is
bound via the state switching tether. A diameter of 50 nm for the
primary particle yields a scattering cross-section that is close to
the 20 × 70 nm2 rod when both are excited on the red
wing of their plasmon resonance.The temporal response of this
canonical sphere–sphere dimer
is remarkably similar to the heterodimer, and we again observe a crossover
from a shot noise limited regime to a Brownian noise limited regime
on time scales of ∼1 μs (see Supporting Note 8). Surprisingly, the SNR of the sphere–sphere
dimer is similar to the heterodimer, despite the larger primary particle
and broader plasmon resonance.[42] The similarity
in SNR is caused by a smaller absorption cross section of the sphere–sphere
dimer allowing for a higher excitation power before the surface temperature
increase exceeds 2 K. The SNR does not increase continuously with
the tether particle diameter but has an optimum at 18 nm for the heterodimer.
This reflects the fact that larger particles become substantially
larger than the near-field, contributing increasingly less to the
plasmon shift. Additionally, a larger particle will have a lower diffusion
coefficient, which reduces the SNR for shorter integration times because
the Brownian motion is averaged less by integration of the signal,
leading to the effective detection of more Brownian noise. A direct
comparison of the correlation time τp for the two
geometries is shown in Figure , where we find that τp is mainly determined
by the diameter of the tether particle in the investigated size-regime.
This implies that robust sensors with a well-defined temporal resolution
can be constructed as long as the diameter of the tether particle
is well controlled. Current synthesis protocols for gold spheres result
in a size distribution with a coefficient of variation of no more
than 10%, yielding the required control over τp.
Figure 4
Correlation
time τp for the heterodimer and sphere–sphere
dimer as a function of the diameter of the tether particle. The corresponding
SNRs for tint = τp are
around 2 for all tether particle diameters (see Figure S4). The dashed line indicates a linear guide to the
eye (slope of 50 ns/nm).
Correlation
time τp for the heterodimer and sphere–sphere
dimer as a function of the diameter of the tether particle. The corresponding
SNRs for tint = τp are
around 2 for all tether particle diameters (see Figure S4). The dashed line indicates a linear guide to the
eye (slope of 50 ns/nm).Our simulations assume that the tether particle is attached
on
the tip of the primary particle. Attachment to the side of the nanorod
would lead to a factor 5 smaller plasmon shift (see Figure S1) and thus factor lower
SNR ratio in the shot noise limited
regime. Tip-specific functionalization is thus preferred and can be
achieved using site-specific functionalization protocols reported
in literature.[43−46] In addition, pioneering work by Mirkin and Alivisatos allows for
the synthesis and purification of monovalent constructs.[47,48] For the heterodimer, the optimum signal-to-noise ratio is then achieved
by employing a linearly polarized excitation field along the nanorod-axis
(see Figure b). For
the sphere–sphere dimer, the orientation of the dimer’s
dipole moment is modulated by the position of the tether particle,
so in this case circularly polarized light results in maximum signal-to-noise
ratio.Up to now we considered a two-state switching tether
with a fixed
initial and final contour length. However, many biomolecules exhibit
short-lived intermediates in their folding trajectory with microsecond
lifetimes; prime examples are metastable intermediates of small folding
proteins,[49] partially open intermediates
associated with membrane transporters,[50] and pseudoknots in oligonucleotides.[51] Such metastable states have typical lifetimes of some tens of microseconds
but cannot be detected directly. In Figure a, we show a simulated timetrace of an oligonucleotide
that exchanges between three conformations on microsecond time scales.
Extraction of the underlying states using change-point analysis illustrates
the capability of the plasmon ruler to reliably detect short-lived
intermediate conformations. This also allows us to generalize our
results to an arbitrary conformational change by considering a change
in contour length from linit to lfin. We focus on the heterodimer and numerically
evaluate its capability to resolve these transitions for an 18 nm
diameter tether particle at tint = 1 μs.
We plot the results in Figure , where contour lines indicate the SNR achievable for a certain
Figure 5
(a) Timetrace of a three-state DNA hairpin
representing a system
with an intermediate metastable state, simulated for tint = 1 μs and ηdet = 5%. The red
line presents the analysis of the timetrace using a change point step
finding algorithm.[52] The dimer consists
of a nanorod of 20 × 70 nm2 and a tether particle
with a diameter of 18 nm. The colored bar at the top of the graph
represents the state of the system. The contour lengths of the three
states are, respectively, 50 nt for the open state (31.5 nm, blue),
20 nt for the intermediate state (12.5 nm, green), and 7 nt for the
closed state (4.4 nm, red). The states have a random lifetime between
30 and 150 us. (b) The calculated SNR for an arbitrary change in the
contour length of a ssDNA tether for tint = 1 μs. The SNR is shown as a contour plot with the initial
and final contour length of the ssDNA tether on the x-axis and y-axis. Note that under all conditions
the Brownian motion of the tether particle is the limiting factor;
the shot noise is negligible. The red crosses correspond to the DNA
contour length change occurring between the open, intermediate, and
closed state of the hairpin. The dashed line indicates zero change
in contour length.
(a) Timetrace of a three-state DNA hairpin
representing a system
with an intermediate metastable state, simulated for tint = 1 μs and ηdet = 5%. The red
line presents the analysis of the timetrace using a change point step
finding algorithm.[52] The dimer consists
of a nanorod of 20 × 70 nm2 and a tether particle
with a diameter of 18 nm. The colored bar at the top of the graph
represents the state of the system. The contour lengths of the three
states are, respectively, 50 nt for the open state (31.5 nm, blue),
20 nt for the intermediate state (12.5 nm, green), and 7 nt for the
closed state (4.4 nm, red). The states have a random lifetime between
30 and 150 us. (b) The calculated SNR for an arbitrary change in the
contour length of a ssDNA tether for tint = 1 μs. The SNR is shown as a contour plot with the initial
and final contour length of the ssDNA tether on the x-axis and y-axis. Note that under all conditions
the Brownian motion of the tether particle is the limiting factor;
the shot noise is negligible. The red crosses correspond to the DNA
contour length change occurring between the open, intermediate, and
closed state of the hairpin. The dashed line indicates zero change
in contour length.As expected, larger values
for Δl lead to
a higher SNR for detection of the state-change, reaching SNR >
3.5
for Δl = 40 nm. We find that a certain Δl can be resolved with higher SNR for shorter linit. This is explained by three effects: (i) at shorter linit the relative change in contour length is
larger; (ii) because of the increased effect of molecular coiling
at larger tether lengths, the time-averaged particle-separation scales
sublinearly with contour length; and (iii) the plasmon shift for a
certain value of Δl is larger if it occurs
closer to the nanorod surface because the gradient in the near-field
is higher (Figure c).The required SNR to extract a state change depends on the
lifetimes
of the intermediate states and the used analytical method. For example,
detection of a state-change by simple thresholding requires a SNR
∼ 2, while hidden Markov modeling can analyze state changes
at lower SNR.[53−55] At SNR = 1, discrete contour length changes of 3
nm → 5.5 nm → 9 nm → 15 nm → 35 nm are
detectable and directly relevant to the folding of aptamers, DNA hairpins,
and polypeptides, for example. This implies that under optimized conditions,
up to five individual states can be distinguished, providing the opportunity
to investigate multistate folding.
Discussion and Conclusions
Our numerical simulations show that plasmonic nanorulers are a
promising platform to study the conformational dynamics of molecules
in real-time at microsecond time scales. Because of the brightness
and photostability of the plasmon resonance, the temporal resolution
is not limited by shot noise but rather by the diffusion of the tether
particle that introduces fluctuations of the optical signal. The use
of a large primary particle allows for the use of a very small tether
particle, thus minimizing interference of the molecular dynamics.
The ultimate temporal resolution is approximately 3 orders of magnitude
higher than state-of-the-art single-molecule FRET because of a higher
photon budget and approximately ∼10 times higher than recent
force-based methods owing to the nanometer-sized tether particles.[10] Surprisingly, we observe a very similar response
between both types of dimers because of the compensating effect of
the ratio between the absorption and scattering cross-section. In
our simulation results, the most optimal system for the observation
of molecular dynamics with an integration time of 1 μs is a
nanorod with dimensions 20 × 70 nm2 with a tether
particle of Ø 18 nm.One of the strengths
of single-molecule FRET is the ability to
probe many constructs simultaneously in the field of view of the microscope
to acquire statistics. Plasmon rulers are equally well probed in parallel
by imaging the scattered signal on a camera,[33] where access to microsecond time scales is warranted by an intensified
CCD camera or by commercially available high-speed CMOS cameras. This
makes the experimental implementation of plasmon rulers straightforward
because the microscope required is already available in nearly any
research laboratory. Plasmonic nanorulers therefore overcome important
hurdles in existing techniques and combine the advantages of single-molecule
FRET (zero-force conditions, parallelization) and force-based methods
(continuous microsecond integration times), paving the way to start
unraveling the folding process and its heterogeneity in real-time.
Authors: Björn M Reinhard; Sassan Sheikholeslami; Alexander Mastroianni; A Paul Alivisatos; Jan Liphardt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ryan T Hill; Jack J Mock; Angus Hucknall; Scott D Wolter; Nan M Jokerst; David R Smith; Ashutosh Chilkoti Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Jeanne Elisabeth van Dongen; Laurens Rudi Spoelstra; Johanna Theodora Wilhelmina Berendsen; Joshua Taylor Loessberg-Zahl; Jan Cornelis Titus Eijkel; Loes Irene Segerink Journal: ACS Sens Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 7.711