Literature DB >> 23085375

Temporal orienting of attention is interfered by concurrent working memory updating.

Mariagrazia Capizzi1, Angel Correa, Daniel Sanabria.   

Abstract

A previous dual-task study (Capizzi, Sanabria, & Correa, 2012) showed that temporal orienting of attention was disrupted by performing a concurrent working memory task, while sequential effects were preserved. Here, we recorded event related potentials (ERPs) during single- and dual-task performance to investigate how this behavioural dissociation would be expressed in neural activity measures. The single-task condition required participants to respond to a visual target stimulus that could be anticipated on the basis of a highly predictive temporal cue. The dual-task condition introduced a concurrent working memory task, in which colour information had to be updated on every trial. The behavioural results replicated our previous findings of impaired temporal orienting, but preserved sequential effects, under dual-task relative to single-task conditions. The ERPs results showed that temporal orienting and sequential effects both modulated the cue-locked preparatory contingent negative variation (CNV) and the target-locked N2 amplitude and P3 latency under single-task, but not under dual-task conditions. In contrast to temporal orienting, sequential effects were also observed at the early target-locked P1 and N1 potentials. Crucially, only the P1 modulation survived dual-task interference. These findings provide novel electrophysiological evidence that performance of a concurrent working memory task may interfere in a selective way with neural activity specifically linked to temporal orienting of attention.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23085375     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty.

Authors:  Ciara A Devine; Christine Gaffney; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.

Authors:  Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Monitoring prediction errors facilitates cognition in action.

Authors:  John Plass; Simon Choi; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-11-12

4.  Spatiotemporal neurodynamics of automatic temporal expectancy in 9-month old infants.

Authors:  Giovanni Mento; Eloisa Valenza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Phasic and sustained interactions of multisensory interplay and temporal expectation.

Authors:  Felix Ball; Fabienne Fuehrmann; Fenja Stratil; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Developmental Trajectories of Internally and Externally Driven Temporal Prediction.

Authors:  Giovanni Mento; Vincenza Tarantino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effects of incidentally learned temporal and spatial predictability on response times and visual fixations during target detection and discrimination.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; S Lee Hong; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Justin M Ericson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Temporal orienting of attention can be preserved in normal aging.

Authors:  Joshua J Chauvin; Celine R Gillebert; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Glyn W Humphreys; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.