Literature DB >> 30420320

Use of laparoscopic videos amongst surgical trainees in the United Kingdom.

Valerio Celentano1, Neil Smart2, Ronan A Cahill3, John S McGrath4, Sharmila Gupta5, John P Griffith6, Austin G Acheson7, Tom D Cecil8, Mark G Coleman9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical trainers consider laparoscopic videos as a useful teaching aid to maximize trainees' learning and skill development given the backdrop of time constraints and productivity demands. Aim of this study is to assess the current use of laparoscopic videos amongst surgical trainees in the United Kingdom.
METHODS: A steering committee of 15 experienced laparoscopic trainers from 8 countries developed a survey on the use of laparoscopic videos by surgical trainees. The survey items were finalized by discussion through e-mails, teleconferences, and face-to-face meetings and a finalised questionnaire was distributed amongst surgical trainees in the United Kingdom.
RESULTS: 92 trainees were invited and 75 returned the questionnaire (81.5%). 86.7% of the trainees routinely watched online surgical videos and the more frequently used websites were Youtube.com and Websurg.com. Trainees require laparoscopic videos to have supplementary educational content such as English commentary (90.7%) and use of snapshots (93.3%) and diagrams (86.7%). Position of the patient and trocars, indication for surgery, preoperative data and postoperative outcomes are required characteristics of laparoscopic videos. 29 trainees (38.7%) do not record the laparoscopic procedures they perform, despite the majority of them recognising the usefulness of routine video-recording for training purposes (78.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical trainees consider videos a useful adjunct in laparoscopic surgery training, with preference for open access sources. Trainees value highly informative videos with supplementary educational content.
Copyright © 2018 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distance learning; Laparoscopic surgery; Surgical training; Surgical videos

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30420320     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  11 in total

1.  Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): are we doing it for the right indication? An assessment of the external validity of published online video resources.

Authors:  Balaji Mahendran; Anna Caiazzo; Mark Coleman; Valerio Celentano
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Academic surgery amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A perspective of the present and future challenges.

Authors:  MinHua Zheng; Luigi Boni; Selman Uranues; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Abraham Fingerhut
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 3.  Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training.

Authors:  Runzhuo Ma; Sharath Reddy; Erik B Vanstrum; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  The lasting footprint of COVID-19 on surgical education: A resident and attending perspective on the global pandemic.

Authors:  Taryne A Imai; Harmik J Soukiasian; Adam Truong; Van Chau; Farin Amersi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Social media in surgery: evolving role in research communication and beyond.

Authors:  Rebecca Grossman; Olivia Sgarbura; Julie Hallet; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Educational value of YouTube Surgical Videos of Thulium Laser Enucleation of The Prostate (ThuLEP): the quality assessment.

Authors:  Kunlin Yang; Yisen Meng; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07

7.  Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Training Method for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Simulated Decision-Making Exercise to Assess the Critical View of Safety.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Emmanouil Mylonakis; Petros Anagnostopoulos; Konstantinos Lamprakakis; Christos Agalianos; Dimitrios P Korkolis; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2021-12-23

8.  New learning area in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: YouTube® or WebSurg®?

Authors:  Cemil Yuksel; Serdar Çulcu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  How to report educational videos in robotic surgery: an international multidisciplinary consensus statement.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano; Neil Smart; John McGrath; Ronan A Cahill; Antonino Spinelli; Ben Challacombe; Igor Belyansky; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Venkatesh Munikrishnan; Gianluca Pellino; Jamil Ahmed; Filip Muysoms; Avanish Saklani; Jim Khan; Daniel Popowich; Conrad Ballecer; Mark G Coleman
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-03-07

10.  Deep learning-based automatic surgical step recognition in intraoperative videos for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Daichi Kitaguchi; Nobuyoshi Takeshita; Hiroki Matsuzaki; Hiro Hasegawa; Takahiro Igaki; Tatsuya Oda; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.