APOBEC3 enzymes form part of the innate immune system by deaminating cytosine to uracil in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and thereby preventing the spread of pathogenic genetic information. However, APOBEC mutagenesis is also exploited by viruses and cancer cells to increase rates of evolution, escape adaptive immune responses, and resist drugs. This raises the possibility of APOBEC3 inhibition as a strategy for augmenting existing antiviral and anticancer therapies. Here we show that, upon incorporation into short ssDNAs, the cytidine nucleoside analogue 2'-deoxyzebularine (dZ) becomes capable of inhibiting the catalytic activity of selected APOBEC variants derived from APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, and APOBEC3G, supporting a mechanism in which ssDNA delivers dZ to the active site. Multiple experimental approaches, including isothermal titration calorimetry, fluorescence polarization, protein thermal shift, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy assays, demonstrate nanomolar dissociation constants and low micromolar inhibition constants. These dZ-containing ssDNAs constitute the first substrate-like APOBEC3 inhibitors and, together, comprise a platform for developing nucleic acid-based inhibitors with cellular activity.
APOBEC3 enzymes form part of the innate immune system by deaminating cytosine to uracil in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and thereby preventing the spread of pathogenic genetic information. However, APOBEC mutagenesis is also exploited by viruses and cancer cells to increase rates of evolution, escape adaptive immune responses, and resist drugs. This raises the possibility of APOBEC3 inhibition as a strategy for augmenting existing antiviral and anticancer therapies. Here we show that, upon incorporation into short ssDNAs, the cytidine nucleoside analogue 2'-deoxyzebularine (dZ) becomes capable of inhibiting the catalytic activity of selected APOBEC variants derived from APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, and APOBEC3G, supporting a mechanism in which ssDNA delivers dZ to the active site. Multiple experimental approaches, including isothermal titration calorimetry, fluorescence polarization, protein thermal shift, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy assays, demonstrate nanomolar dissociation constants and low micromolar inhibition constants. These dZ-containing ssDNAs constitute the first substrate-like APOBEC3 inhibitors and, together, comprise a platform for developing nucleic acid-based inhibitors with cellular activity.
Enzymes of the human APOBEC3
(A3A-H) family normally combat retroviruses and other pathogenic elements
by deaminating 2′-deoxycytidine to 2′-deoxyuridine in
single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (Figure A). The combination of this deamination-dependent mechanism
and a deamination-independent mechanism,[1] most likely dependent on nucleic acid binding, constitutes a potent
block to parasite replication. Not surprisingly, viral pathogens have
developed A3 counteraction strategies that range from active degradation
(HIV-1 and related lentiviruses)[1−4] to apparently passive avoidance (papilloma viruses
and polyomaviruses).[5,6] Moreover, the fact that many immune-escape
and drug-resistance mutations occur within A3-preferred di- and trinucleotide
motifs[7−10] strongly suggests that viruses have evolved mechanisms for both
regulating and benefiting from A3 mutagenesis.
Figure 1
(A) Deamination of dC
in ssDNA by A3 enzymes. (B) TSAs used in
this work: zebularine, its 2′-deoxy analogue (dZ), 5-methyl-2′-deoxyzebularine
(dZMe), and tetrahydrouridine (THU).
(A) Deamination of dC
in ssDNA by A3 enzymes. (B) TSAs used in
this work: zebularine, its 2′-deoxy analogue (dZ), 5-methyl-2′-deoxyzebularine
(dZMe), and tetrahydrouridine (THU).A3 enzymes have intrinsic preferences for deaminating cytosine
bases preceded by thymine (5′-TC, A3A-D, A3F, and A3H) or by
another cytosine (5′-CC, A3G).[10−14] The genomes of many different tumor types, including bladder, breast,
cervix, head/neck, and lung, often have large fractions of mutations
in 5′-TC motifs.[15−17] These 5′-TC-to-TT and
5′-TC-to-TG mutations are typically followed on the 3′-side
by bases other than cytosine, that is, adenine, guanine, or thymine,
thereby constituting an APOBEC mutation signature. A range of genetic,
biochemical, and structural studies has combined to implicate A3B
as the primary source of these mutations and A3A and A3H as potential
secondary sources (depending on patient genotype and tumor type).
APOBEC mutagenesis has been shown to contribute to both clonal and
subclonal mutational events,[17,18] and its frequency often
increases from primary to metastatic disease.[16] A3B expression levels and APOBEC signature mutations also correlate
with poor clinical outcomes, including disease recurrence, metastasis,
and drug resistance.[15,19,20] These observations support a model in which APOBEC mutagenesis promotes
tumor evolution and strongly influences disease trajectories. Therefore,
chemical modulators of APOBEC activity may yield useful chemical probes
for mechanistic studies and, possibly, therapeutic compounds to harness
APOBEC mutagenesis.[21]The mechanism
of cytosine deamination for APOBECs is thought to
be similar to that for cytidine deaminase (CDA), an enzyme that processes
individual nucleosides.[22] The cytidine
analogues zebularine [Z (Figure B)], 2′-deoxyzebularine (dZ), and tetrahydrouridine
(THU) are known transition-state analogues (TSAs) of cytidine deaminase
(CDA).[23−25] These competitive inhibitors bind tightly to the
active site of CDA, as indicated by crystal structures.[23−28] Here we show that these TSAs as free nucleosides do not alter the
activity of A3 enzymes (Figure S1), but
micromolar-potent A3 inhibitors are obtained upon introduction of
dZ in place of the target 2′-deoxycytidine in DNA substrates
(dZ-ssDNA). These findings open new avenues for further investigations
of interactions between active A3 enzymes and ssDNA and, importantly,
for the rational design of competitive A3 inhibitors for use with
living cells.
Materials and Methods
Detailed methods
are provided in the Supporting Information.
Synthesis of 2′-Deoxyzebularine (dZ),
Its Phosphoramidite,
and Oligonucleotides Containing dZ and dZMe
Synthetic
procedures are provided in the Supporting Information.
Protein Expression and Purification
Human APO-BEC3A
(residues 1–199, Uniprot entry P31941) was cloned as the inactive E72A
mutant with a His6 C-terminal fusion tag into an expression
vector (pETite, Lucigen), expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 DE3 cells (Hi-Control, Lucigen), and purified as described
previously.[29]The A3B C-terminal
domain (residues 187–378) was cloned into the pET24a vector
(Novagen) to produce A3BCTD proteins with a noncleavable
C-terminal His6 tag (LEHHHHHH) that were derived as previously
described.[30] Several derivative constructs
previously reported[31] were used in this
study. A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3 and A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A
were expressed in E. coli strainBL21(DE3) (Lucigen),
and A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap was expressed in E. coli strain C41(DE3)pLysS (Lucigen). The E. coli culture was grown at 37 °C in LB medium; once the mid log growth
phase had been reached, the culture was supplemented with 100 μM
zinc chloride, before protein expression was induced by the addition
of isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to
a final concentration of 0.5 mM and overnight incubation at 18 °C.A3BCTD-DM was expressed and purified as reported in
ref [31]. A3GCTD (residues 191–384, wt) was purified as described
previously.[32] The glutathione S-transferase (GST)-fused A3GCTD was expressed in E. coliBL21(DE3) cells overnight at 17 °C. After being
harvested, the cells were resuspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.4) and lysed by sonication. After ultracentrifugation at 25000g for 10 min, the supernatant was added to glutathione (GSH)-Sepharose,
which was subsequently washed. For kinetic analysis, the GST fusion
protein was eluted from the Sepharose matrix with 100 mM GSH in phosphate
buffer. By using filtration at 4000g, the buffer
was changed to a solution containing 75 mM sodium phosphate and 75
mM citrate (pH 5.5).
Fluorescence Polarization Assay
Fluorescence polarization
assays were performed with recombinant [purified from E. coli strainBL21(DE3)] A3A (amino acids 1–195, expressed using
the pGEX vector as a GST fusion protein)[30] with the catalytic glutamic acid mutated to alanine (E72A) to render
the enzyme unable to deaminate the substrate. The assay buffer consisted
of 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES; 50 mM,
aqueous), NaCl (100 mM, aqueous), tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP;
2 mM, aqueous), and 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate
(CHAPS; 4 mM, aqueous) at pH 6.0. The 15 μM stock solutions
of fluorescent tracer 5′-(6-FAM)TTTTCAT (Integrated DNA
Technologies; molecular weight of 2598.3 g/mol) in molecular biology
grade water were diluted to 15 nM in assay buffer. All FP experiments
were performed with a 10 μL assay volume in black round-bottom
low-volume 384-well plates (Corning 4514). A direct binding experiment
(Chart S3) was first performed to determine
the Kd of 5′-(6-FAM)TTTTCAT-3′
with A3A-E72A by serially diluting the protein (1:1, 10 μM starting
concentration) and incubating with a constant concentration (15 nM)
of the fluorescent tracer. Plates were incubated at room temperature
for 30 min, gently shaken for 1 min, and then analyzed for fluorescence
polarization on a BioTek Synergy 2 instrument (using standard instrument
settings) with an excitation wavelength of 485 (20) nm, an emission
wavelength of 528 (20) nm, and the top optics position at 510 nm.
The resulting anisotropy values were fit using the one-site binding
(hyperbola) function in GraphPad Prism 7.0 to obtain the Kd of the fluorescent tracer. The directly measured Kd was 18.2 ± 1.0 nM (Chart S3). This value was used for all further calculations.
Competition binding experiments were then performed with the prebound
fluorescent tracer and various test ligands to quantify their binding
affinities, as described in the Supporting Information.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)
Desalted unmodified
DNA oligonucleotides were purchased (Integrated DNA Technologies)
at 1 or 5 μmol synthesis scale and dissolved in one of the buffers
described below to give 10 mM solutions. ITC experiments were conducted
at 25 °C using a Micro-Cal ITC200 (now Malvern Instruments) isothermal
titration calorimeter. A3A-E72A (130 μM in high-salt or medium-salt
buffer) or A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap (100 μM, activity
assay buffer) was titrated in the corresponding buffer. DNA oligonucleotidesat 1.6 mM (for A3A-E72A) or 300 μM (for A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap)
were added in 18 steps of 2.0 μL each (plus a first addition
with decreased volume of 0.4 μL to prevent dilution of the DNA
in the syringe due to the long wait before the start of the experiment).
Oligos and the enzymes were dialyzed against the appropriate buffer.
For A3A-E72A, the high-salt buffer consisted of 25 mM sodium phosphate,
500 mM NaCl, 300 mM choline acetate, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol,
and 0.2 mM Na2-EDTA (pH 6.0) and the medium-salt buffer
consisted of 50 mM MES, 100 mM NaCl, and 2.0 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine
(pH 6.0). For A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap, the activity
assay buffer consisted of 50 mM citrate-phosphate buffer, 200 mM NaCl,
and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 5.5).
Thermal Shift Assay
A fluorescence-based thermal shift
assay was used to assess the capability of ssDNA oligonucleotides
to bind A3BCTD proteins, through examination of changes
in the thermal stability of the proteins. Binding assays were conducted
using A3BCTD protein constructs, A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3
and A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A, where the over the time
of the experiment there was insignificant conversion of dC to dU by
the very weakly active A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3 and none by
the inactive mutant A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A to determine
if differences in binding affinity occur due to a single amino acid
change (E255A) in the protein. Purified A3BCTD protein
was appropriately diluted in buffer [50 mM citrate-phosphate (pH 5.5),
200 mM NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 5.5), and 200 μM
4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid (DSS)]. Assay experiments
were set up in a total volume of 25 μL containing 20 μM
A3BCTD protein and 100 μM ssDNA oligonucleotide,
mixed with SYPRO Orange dye (Bio-Rad) at a final concentration of
10×. Assays were dispensed into wells of a white low-profile
96-well plate (Roche), sealed with an optical seal, shaken, and centrifuged.
Thermal scanning (from 20 to 95 °C at a rate of 0.6 °C/min)
was performed using a real-time polymerase chain reaction setup on
a LightCycler 480 instrument II (Roche) with fluorescence emission
spectra recorded with combinations of excitation and emission filters
(483–610 and 483–568 nm, respectively).
Evaluation
of Nucleosides by a Fluorescence-Based Deamination
Assay Using hA3A and hA3BCTD Expressed in HEK293T Cells
A3-deaminase activity assays were performed according to the method
described by Li and colleagues[33] with the
following modifications. Stock solutions of nucleosides in molecular
biology grade water were serially diluted in protein dilution buffer
(10 μL). Recombinant (purified from HEK293T cells) full length
A3A-mycHis[33] (10 ng) or C-terminal
domain (amino acids 195–382) A3BCTD-mycHis[34,35] (25 ng) proteins were delivered to each well in protein dilution
buffer (10 μL). The deamination dual-fluorophoric substrate
oligo 5′-(6-FAM)-AAA-TAT-CCC-AAA-GAG-AGA-(TAMRA) (2 pmol) and
UDG (25 units) were delivered in TE buffer (10 μL). Cleavage
of oligonucleotides containing an abasic site using NaOH (4 M, 3 μL)
occurred after incubation of the reaction mixture at 37 °C for
30 min. Plates were read using a BioTek Synergy H1 plate reader with
an excitation wavelength at 490 nm and emission at 520 nm. Each experiment
was performed in biological duplicates with three technical replicates
per condition. The resulting total fluorescence values were reported
together with the no-protein low control and protein only high control
(no inhibitors). Nonspecific inhibitor MN-1 was used as a positive
control (Figure S1).[33]
Evaluation of Inhibitors in a Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance (NMR)-Based
Assay
The Supporting Information provides details about the experiments and how inhibition constants
were calculated.
Results
Methodology of This Investigation
First, we confirmed
that pyrimidine-based TSAnucleosides (Figure B) do not inhibit A3 enzymes (Figure S1). Because ssDNA is the preferred substrate
of A3 proteins, we decided to evaluate the inhibitory effect of chemically
modified ssDNAs in which the target 2′-deoxycytidine in the
recognition sequence[32,36] is substituted with TSAs. We
focused on 2′-deoxyzebularine (dZ), as it is a known, stable,
moderately potent TSA inhibitor of CDA with an apparent Ki of 2.9 μM[37] and its
incorporation into DNA by automated synthesis is feasible.[38] The quantity of modified oligos needed for the
planned experiments warranted development of a new synthesis procedure
for dZ. Then, we investigated the binding affinity and inhibitory
activity of selected modified oligos. Binding data were recorded using
a combination of fluorescence polarization (FP), ITC, and thermal
shift assays. We confirmed that 9–10 nucleotides is a good
compromise between the length of the oligo and binding affinity and
concluded that binding of TSA-containing oligos must be investigated
with catalytically active proteins. Finally, our activity data show
clearly the inhibition of selected A3 variants by dZ-containing oligos.
The list of proteins used can be found in Figure S3, and the sequences of oligos in Tables and 2. One should
note that the preferred A3G substrate motif is CCCA (underlined C preferentially deaminated), whereas A3A and A3B prefer
the TCA motif but can also readily deaminate the CCCA motif. The rationale
for the design of each oligo can be found in Table S3.
Table 1
Oligo Concentrations
when the Fluorescence
Anisotropy Decreased to the Half-Maximum Level (IC50) and
Indirectly Measured Dissociation Constants (KdFP) of ssDNA from A3A-E72A Obtained during Fluorescence
Polarization (FP) Experiments in a Medium-Salt Buffera
DNA sequence (5′–3′)
IC50 (μM)
KdFP (μM)
Oligo-3*c
ATTCCCAATT
0.0550 ± 0.0011
0.007 ± 0.001
Oligo-4*
TTCCC
5.6 ± 0.8
0.68 ± 0.11
Oligo-5*
CCCAA
1.8 ± 0.10
0.22 ± 0.02
Oligo-10*
TTTTCAT
0.2800 ± 0.0016
0.034 ± 0.002
Oligo-11
TTTTdUATb
15.0 ± 1.9
1.8 ± 0.3
Oligo-12
TTTTCATTTT
0.0960 ± 0.0012
0.012 ± 0.001
Oligo-13
AAAAATTCAAAGA
0.120 ± 0.004
0.015 ± 0.001
Oligo-14
TTCAAAAA
0.1400 ± 0.0022
0.017 ± 0.001
Oligo-15
TTTTdZAT
2.40 ± 0.10
0.29 ± 0.02
Values shown are
means ± SEM
(standard error of the mean). IC50 values were converted
to KdFP values using the Kenakin
equation (see the Supporting Information) with appropriate error propagation.
dU is 2′-deoxyuridine.
An asterisk denotes an oligo evaluated
in both ITC and FP experiments.
Table 2
Dissociation Constants (KdITC) of ssDNA from A3 Enzymes Obtained by
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry in Different Buffersa
DNA sequence (5′–3′)
buffer
enzyme
KdITC (μM)
Oligo-1
AAAAAAAATTCAAAAAAAAA
high-salt
A3A-E72A
24 ± 7
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
0.11 ± 0.05
Oligo-2
ATTTCATTT
high-salt
A3A-E72A
25.3 ± 0.9
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
0.20 ± 0.04
Oligo-3*b
ATTCCCAATT
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
0.24 ± 0.10
Oligo-4*
TTCCC
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
5.0 ± 0.4
Oligo-5*
CCCAA
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
3.1 ± 0.4
Oligo-6
TTCAT
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
0.48 ± 0.10
Oligo-7
ATTCCdZAATT
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
0.97 ± 0.15
Oligo-8
ATTCCdZMeAATT
medium-salt
A3A-E72A
1.7 ± 0.3
Oligo-9
ATTTdZATTT
activity assay
A3Bc-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap
5.5 ± 0.6
Oligo-10*
TTTTCAT
med. salt
A3A-E72A
0.27 ± 0.04
Oligo-16
5′-(6-FAM)TTT TCAT
med. salt
A3A-E72A
0.41 ± 0.04
The high-salt buffer
consisted of
25 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, 300 mM choline acetate, 5 mM
β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.2 mM Na2-EDTA (pH 6.0).
The medium-salt buffer consisted of 50 mM MES, 100 mM NaCl, and 2.0
mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (pH 6.0). The activity assay buffer
consisted of 50 mM citrate-phosphate buffer, 200 mM NaCl, and 2 mM
β-mercaptoethanol (pH 5.5). Means ± the standard deviation
(SD) are shown. Uncertainties (SD) in KdITC were calculated using standard error propagation methods
from partial derivatives.
An asterisk denotes an oligo evaluated
in both ITC and FP experiments. A3A prefers to deaminate the third
C in the CCC motif.[36]
Values shown are
means ± SEM
(standard error of the mean). IC50 values were converted
to KdFP values using the Kenakin
equation (see the Supporting Information) with appropriate error propagation.dU is 2′-deoxyuridine.An asterisk denotes an oligo evaluated
in both ITC and FP experiments.The high-salt buffer
consisted of
25 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, 300 mM choline acetate, 5 mM
β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.2 mM Na2-EDTA (pH 6.0).
The medium-salt buffer consisted of 50 mM MES, 100 mM NaCl, and 2.0
mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (pH 6.0). The activity assay buffer
consisted of 50 mM citrate-phosphate buffer, 200 mM NaCl, and 2 mM
β-mercaptoethanol (pH 5.5). Means ± the standard deviation
(SD) are shown. Uncertainties (SD) in KdITC were calculated using standard error propagation methods
from partial derivatives.An asterisk denotes an oligo evaluated
in both ITC and FP experiments. A3A prefers to deaminate the third
C in the CCC motif.[36]
A3 Activity Is Unaffected
by Free Nucleoside Transition-State
Analogues
HumanA3A and the catalytic C-terminal domain of
A3B (A3BCTD) were purified from human293T cells (hA3A,
hA3BCTD)[33] and tested using
a fluorescence-based activity assay[33] (for
details, see Materials and Methods and the Supporting Information) for inhibition by nucleosidesTHU, Z, and dZ. The nonspecific small molecule inhibitor MN-1[33] almost completely abolished the activity of
enzymes used in the assay (hA3A, hA3BCTD, and UDG). In
contrast, THU, Z, and dZ did not affect the deamination of ssDNA by
these enzymes, even at the high concentration of 2 mM (Figure S1). These results are consistent with
earlier observations of no or very weak binding of A3 proteins to
individual nucleotides and barely detectable deamination of 2′-deoxycytidine.[39,40]
Synthesis of dZ-Containing
ssDNA
We developed a new
straightforward procedure for preparing dZphosphoramidite for incorporation
into ssDNA based on the classical silyl modification of the Hilbert–Johnson
reaction (Scheme and
the Supporting Information). This synthesis,
which is free of Lewis acids and requires no workup, leads straightforwardly
to product 3a, which was purified by flash chromatography.
We obtained a ratio and yield of the desired β anomer (88:12
β:α) much higher than those determined by the previously
published procedure.[38,41] dZ was further used in the synthesis
of modified 2′-oligodeoxynucleotides (Oligos) as described
in the Supporting Information. Commercially
available phosphoramidite of 5-methyl-2′-deoxyzebularine was
used in the synthesis of dZMe-containing oligos.
Scheme 1
Reagents and conditions: (i) CHCl3, distillation, 10 min, 54%, 12:88 α:β
(3a); (ii) 28% aqueous ammonia, MeOH,
48 h (3b); (iii) 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl
chloride, pyridine, 0 °C → room temperature, overnight,
54% (4a); (iv) N,N-diisopropylamino-2-cyanoethoxychlorophosphine, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 30 min, 88% (4b).
Reagents and conditions: (i) CHCl3, distillation, 10 min, 54%, 12:88 α:β
(3a); (ii) 28% aqueous ammonia, MeOH,
48 h (3b); (iii) 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl
chloride, pyridine, 0 °C → room temperature, overnight,
54% (4a); (iv) N,N-diisopropylamino-2-cyanoethoxychlorophosphine, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 30 min, 88% (4b).
Binding of Modified and Unmodified ssDNAs
to A3 Proteins
We tested how the introduction of dZ and its
5-methyl derivative,
dZMe, affected the affinity of ssDNA for the A3 enzymes,
in particular A3A and the catalytically competent A3BCTD and selected mutants, to probe the generality of zebularine analogues
as inhibitors of A3 proteins. Given that different A3 proteins[13,36] have varying preferences for nucleobases surrounding the target
cytosine, the sequences surrounding the zebularine moiety were chosen
to match the preferred ssDNA recognition motif. To study A3–ssDNA
binding, we used the inactive A3A-E72A mutant, where the active-site
glutamic acid is replaced with alanine, to avoid complications of
deamination reactions occurring when the ligand contained cytosine.
The E72A mutation does not change the geometry of the active site,
as water was observed in the crystal structure instead of the glutamate
side chain.[42] As A3A is a highly active
enzyme with the highest affinity for DNA among humanA3 catalytically
active domains,[29,36] it is best suited for binding
assays. Two methods widely applied for binding characterization were
used: fluorescence polarization (FP) and isothermal titration calorimetry
(ITC), which yield the indirectly determined dissociation constant KdFP [sometimes termed Ki (see the Supporting Information)][43−45] and the directly measured dissociation constant KdITC, respectively.FP measurements
were taken in competitive mode, where unlabeled ssDNA competed with
the fluorescently labeled ssDNA for the protein (Figure S2). This results in dissociation constants KdFP (Table ) that should be directly comparable with KdITC, assuming that the binding of
the unlabeled ssDNA and the binding of fluorescently labeled ssDNA
to the protein are identical. As a positive control, KdFP for the nonlabeled ssDNA (Oligo-10) was
34 ± 2 nM compared to the directly measured value of 19 ±
2 nM for titration of the fluorescently tagged Oligo-10. The differences
between the two values are likely attributable to the experimental
conditions (competitive displacement with a nonlabeled oligo vs direct
binding with a fluorescently labeled oligo). Weaker binding of ssDNA
containing dU (Oligo-11; KdFP = 1800 ± 300 nM), as a negative control, compared to dC is
in accord with published data[29,46,47] and highlights the binding specificity. The dZ-modified DNA had
an affinity for A3A-E72A lower than that of the dC-containing substrate
[for Oligo-15, KdFP = 290 ±
20 nM; for Oligo-10, KdFP =
34 ± 2 nM (Table and vide subra)]. The affinity of the dZ-modified
DNA was still substantially higher than that of the dU-containing
ssDNA that mimics the product of deamination [Oligo-15 vs Oligo-11
(Table )]. The comparison
of Oligo-10, -12, -13, and -14 shows some increase in binding affinity
with a length from seven to ten nucleotides and no further increase
in binding affinity up to 13 nucleotides (Oligo-13).ITC experiments[29] (Table ) were initially performed in
a high-salt buffer (800 mM ionic strength), which was necessary for
sample stability over the multiday, multidimensional NMR measurements.[29] For Oligo-1 (20-mer, A8T2CA9) and the much shorter Oligo-2 (9-mer, AT3CAT3) with a different sequence, very similar dissociation
constants (KdITC) of 24 ±
7 and 25 ± 1 μM, respectively, were obtained (Table ), the former value
being the same as that reported previously.[29] Given the very marked differences from the FP dissociation constants,
further studies proceeded in buffer with a lower salt concentration
(medium buffer, 150 mM ionic strength), comparable to that for FP
measurements. The new KdITC values obtained for Oligo-1 and Oligo-2 were more than 100 times
lower than values measured in the high-salt buffer (Table ). Moreover, differences in
binding were now evident, such that the 20-mer bound nearly twice
as strongly (KdITC = 0.11 ±
0.05 μM) as the 9-mer (KdITC = 0.20 ± 0.04 μM). Further shortening of the DNA sequence
to five nucleotides resulted in a decreased affinity for the protein
(Oligo-4, -5, and -6 compared to Oligo-3 in Table ), showing that binding affinity increases
with oligo length and confirming that a length of ∼9–10
nucleotides is a good compromise between the length of the oligo and
binding affinity. This length is used here and was used previously
in NMR activity assays.[32,48]In general, KdFP values
were somewhat lower than KdITC values (Tables and 2), which can likely be attributed to differences
in experimental conditions: competition binding studies for KdFP versus direct binding experiments
for KdITC. Additionally, the
different concentrations of assay components used may contribute to
different oligomeric states of the protein, thereby affecting the
measured binding affinities. The oligomeric state of A3A-E72A under
these conditions warrants further investigation. Nonetheless, consistent
trends were observed between these two biophysical methods. Shortening
of the oligo resulted in a reduced level of binding to A3A-E72A in
both methods [Oligo-4 and -5 vs Oligo-3 (Tables and 2)], consistent
with the published data.[47] In parallel
with FP results and despite the different oligo sequences that were
used, introduction of dZ into the ssDNA sequence (for Oligo-7, KdITC = 0.97 ± 0.15 μM)
resulted in weaker binding, relative to that of the corresponding
cytidine-containing ssDNA (for Oligo-3, KdITC = 0.24 ± 0.10 μM); specifically, 8.5- and
4-fold increases in KdFP and KdITC, respectively, were observed
(Table ). The
addition of a 5-methyl substituent to dZ (dZMe), Oligo-8,
had a negligible effect on binding relative to that of unmethylated
Oligo-7 (Table ).
This impaired binding of transition-state analogues, dZ- or dZMe-ssDNA, to the E72A mutant, compared to substrate, is consistent
with Glu72 being a critical residue in the formation of the transition
state for active A3 enzymes.To test the importance of the catalytic
glutamate (Glu72 in A3A),
we evaluated binding of ssDNAs to two protein constructs of the catalytically
active C-terminal domain of mutant A3B, A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3
[quadruple mutant with loop 3 removed (Figure S3)] and its catalytically inactive derivative, A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A.[30] For this experiment,
we cannot use active A3A, the most potent A3 deaminase,[36] as it will fully deaminate the substrate during
the experiment. The A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3 enzyme has the
essential glutamic acid in the active site but because of the removal
of loop 3 is only very weakly active in vitro:[31] low conversion of the substrate to the product
was detected by 1H NMR spectroscopy only after incubation
overnight (Figure S4). The interaction
of TSA with the active site is not likely to be affected by the deletion
of loop 3 from these proteins, as the loss of deaminase activity and
associated binding affinity is due to effects outside of the active
site. Deaminase activity can be restored by swapping loop 1 of A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3 with loop 1 of A3A, yielding the active A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap enzyme.[31] On the other hand, in the A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A mutant
the active-site glutamic acid (equivalent to Glu72 in A3A) is replaced
with alanine. Therefore, these proteins provide a unique pair for
evaluating the importance of the catalytic glutamate for binding of
dZ-containing oligos.No binding of ssDNA to A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3 was seen
by ITC under our standard conditions [50 mM citrate-phosphate buffer,
200 mM NaCl, and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 5.5)], consistent
with this mutant’s very low deaminase activity. Moreover, for
a weak binding event such as this to be studied by ITC, the required
concentration of the protein would be in the high micromolar range,
which is prohibitive because A3 proteins tend to precipitate from
solution at this concentration.[49] Consequently,
we decided to use our previously published thermal shift assay,[29] in which high ligand concentrations are used
to enhance complex formation (Figure ).[50] Protein unfolding as
the temperature increases is reported by the increased fluorescence
of the nonpolar dye SYPRO Orange, which binds to hydrophobic patches
exposed upon thermal denaturation. Usually, a higher thermal stability
is associated with the strong binding of the ligand, in our case ssDNA,
to the protein. We observed that the level of binding of oligos to
inactive A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A is significantly lower
than to weakly active A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3, which retains
the catalytic glutamic acid. Moreover, for A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3,
the ΔTm value for dZ-containing
Oligo-9 is 0.72 ± 0.10 °C higher than that for the substrate
containing dC (in Figure , see the 95% confidence interval), which is the expected
result for an ssDNA that bears a TSA instead of dC. For the binding
of inactivated A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A to different DNA
oligos, the binding of dZ oligo cannot be distinguished from binding
of the substrate, illustrating the importance of the active-site glutamate
for binding of transition-state analogues.
Figure 2
Results of thermal shift
assay for A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3
(green) and A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A (blue) in the presence
of the product of deamination (5′-dATTTdUATTT), substrate (5′-dATTTCATTT), and dZ-containing Oligo-9 (dATTTdZATTT). The concentration of proteins was 20 μM, and the
concentration of oligos was 100 μM in the buffer: 50 mM citrate-phosphate
(pH 5.5), 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 5.5), and
200 μM 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid (DSS). Confidence
intervals (95%) are shown as error bars.
Results of thermal shift
assay for A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3
(green) and A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-E255A (blue) in the presence
of the product of deamination (5′-dATTTdUATTT), substrate (5′-dATTTCATTT), and dZ-containing Oligo-9 (dATTTdZATTT). The concentration of proteins was 20 μM, and the
concentration of oligos was 100 μM in the buffer: 50 mM citrate-phosphate
(pH 5.5), 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 5.5), and
200 μM 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid (DSS). Confidence
intervals (95%) are shown as error bars.Altogether, these results demonstrate that the choice of
buffer,
especially the ionic strength, affects strongly, by several orders
of magnitude, the affinity of ssDNA for the A3 proteins. Moreover,
binding of inactive protein to ssDNA-containing TSA is not a reliable
predictor of inhibitory potential of these oligonucleotides. Therefore,
we decided to use our previously described NMR-based activity assay[32] to assess directly the inhibition of substrate
deamination in fully active A3 enzymes by ssDNA-containing TSAs.
2′-Deoxyzebularine Incorporated into ssDNA Is a Micromolar
Inhibitor of A3 Enzymes
The Michaelis–Menten constants
for the enzymes and their mutants used in this study (described in
the Supporting Information), along with
their ssDNA substrates, are summarized in Table . The behavior of A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap[30] (see a description of the enzyme in Figure S3), which has loop 1 of A3A transplanted
into A3BCTD, was intermediate between previously reported
activities for A3A[40] and A3GCTD,[32] consistent with the previously reported
data.[36] However, the kcat of A3BCTD-DM [DM, double mutant (see Figure S3)] was anomalously low [0.008 ±
0.001 s–1 compared to 0.10 ± 0.04 s–1 for A3GCTD[32] (Table )]. Residual enzyme activity
in the presence of dZ-ssDNA inhibitors was monitored directly by our
NMR method.[32,48]
Table 3
Michaelis–Menten
Constants
for Selected A3 Enzymes and Mutants Measured by the NMR Assay[32,40]
protein
substrate
kcat (s–1)
Km (μM)
kcat/Km (s–1 μM–1)
A3GCTDa
Oligo-3
0.10 ± 0.04
570 ± 90
0.00018
A3Ab
Oligo-2
1.2 ± 0.1
66 ± 7
0.018
A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swapc
Oligo-2
0.28 ± 0.04
200 ± 30
0.0014
A3BCTD-DMc
Oligo-2
0.008 ± 0.001
320 ± 60
0.000025
A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3c
barely
active
See ref (32).
See
also ref (40).
See the Supporting Information.
See ref (32).See
also ref (40).See the Supporting Information.Only
the use of dZ instead of dC in the preferred A3GCTD substrate
[Oligo-7 versus Oligo-9 (Figure A,B)] conferred significant inhibition of
A3GCTD deaminase activity. dZMe-ssDNA (Oligo-8)
had a marginal effect on the conversion of the preferred A3GCTD substrate (AT2C3A2T2, Oligo-3) (Figure A). These data are consistent with 5-Me-cytidine being a much poorer
substrate than cytidine for A3 proteins, with the exception of A3H.[51−53] Therefore, for further investigations, we focused on the evaluation
of dZ-containing oligos. For both A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap
and A3BCTD-DM (Figure and the Supporting Information), using preferred substrate 5′-AT3CAT3 (Oligo-2), significant inhibition was observed with
dZ-ssDNA [Oligo-9 (Figure C,D)]. The linear dependence of inverse deamination speed
on inhibitor concentration was analyzed as described in the Supporting Information, assuming competitive
inhibition, yielding micromolar inhibition constants (Ki) (Figure B–D). In particular, for A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap,
the Ki and KdITC for Oligo-9 are very similar, 7.5 ± 1.7 and 5.5
± 0.6 μM, respectively (Figure C and Table ). No binding of Oligo-7 (or any other oligo) to A3GCTD (or catalytic mutant) was seen by ITC [75 mM sodium phosphate
and 75 mM citrate (pH 5.5)] due to the low DNA binding affinity for
A3GCTD [Km(Oligo-3) ≈
600 μM, and Ki(Oligo-7) ≈
50 μM] and low protein solubility.
Figure 3
Inhibition of A3 proteins
by modified oligos in the NMR deaminase
assay. (A) Effects of dZ and dZMe-containing ssDNAs on
deamination of Oligo-3 (dAT2C3A2T2, 500 μM) by A3GCTD (850 μM) at 298
K. The speed of deamination in the absence of inhibitor (No inhibitor)
and in the presence of 100 μM ssDNA inhibitors (dZ-containing
Oligo-7 and Oligo-9 as well as dZMe-containing Oligo-8)
is shown. (B) Inhibition of A3GCTD-catalyzed deamination
of Oligo-3 by dZ-containing Oligo-7. (C) Inhibition of A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap-catalyzed deamination of Oligo-2 by dZ-containing
Oligo-9. (D) Inhibition of A3BCTD-DM-catalyzed deamination
of Oligo-2 by dZ-containing Oligo-9. The bold C is the target 2′-deoxycytidine
deaminated by the enzyme. In all cases, the DNA substrate and inhibitor
have the same sequence except that the cytidine of the substrate has
been changed to dZ.
Inhibition of A3 proteins
by modified oligos in the NMR deaminase
assay. (A) Effects of dZ and dZMe-containing ssDNAs on
deamination of Oligo-3 (dAT2C3A2T2, 500 μM) by A3GCTD (850 μM) at 298
K. The speed of deamination in the absence of inhibitor (No inhibitor)
and in the presence of 100 μM ssDNA inhibitors (dZ-containing
Oligo-7 and Oligo-9 as well as dZMe-containing Oligo-8)
is shown. (B) Inhibition of A3GCTD-catalyzed deamination
of Oligo-3 by dZ-containing Oligo-7. (C) Inhibition of A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap-catalyzed deamination of Oligo-2 by dZ-containing
Oligo-9. (D) Inhibition of A3BCTD-DM-catalyzed deamination
of Oligo-2 by dZ-containing Oligo-9. The bold C is the target 2′-deoxycytidine
deaminated by the enzyme. In all cases, the DNA substrate and inhibitor
have the same sequence except that the cytidine of the substrate has
been changed to dZ.To confirm the competitive
nature of inhibition, the substrate
concentration was varied while the inhibitor (Oligo-9) and enzyme
(A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap) concentrations were kept
constant. In the double-reciprocal plot shown in Figure , the lines from the least-squares
fits to the data in the absence and presence of inhibitor cross the y-axis at essentially the same point (1/vmax = 71 ± 12 s μM–1 and
1/vmax = 83 ± 32 s μM–1, respectively). This result validates our initial prediction that
dZ-ssDNAs are competitive inhibitors of A3 enzymes.
Figure 4
Double-reciprocal plot
(1/V vs 1/[S]) of deamination
of the DNA substrate (Oligo-2) by A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap
at different substrate concentrations in the absence and presence
of dZ-containing Oligo-9 at 20 μM.
Double-reciprocal plot
(1/V vs 1/[S]) of deamination
of the DNA substrate (Oligo-2) by A3BCTD-QM-ΔL3-AL1swap
at different substrate concentrations in the absence and presence
of dZ-containing Oligo-9 at 20 μM.
Discussion
By means of several complementary binding
and activity assays,
we have characterized inhibition of selected A3 variants by chemically
modified ssDNAs possessing 2′-deoxyzebularine analogues. One
finding was that binding of dZ-ssDNA to inactivated proteins in which
the active-site glutamic acid is replaced with alanine (Glu72 in A3A
and Glu255 in A3BCTD) was significantly reduced in comparison
to the substrate. This indicates that the glutamate in the active
site is strongly involved in interaction with the transition state
of deamination. These data are consistent with a model in which the
Glu modifies the TSA by protonation of N3 of the nucleobase causing
the addition of a water molecule to the C4 of dZ, as established for
CDA.[54] In addition, our data clearly show
an influence of buffer on dissociation constants, with a high ionic
strength (800 mM) depressing the affinity by more than 2 orders of
magnitude relative to that with a medium ionic strength (∼100
mM). Our observation that dZMe in the structure of ssDNA
did not provide significant inhibition of A3GCTD is consistent
with earlier observations that 5-Me-cytidine was not deaminated by
A3GCTD.[51−53] On the other hand, dZ instead of dC in ssDNA produced
competitive, micromolar inhibitors of A3GCTD, A3BCTD-QM-ΔL-AL1swap, and A3BCTD-DM. The fact that dZ
and dZMe used in the same oligo sequence had different
inhibitory effects on A3GCTD under identical conditions
means that structure of the TSA determines the inhibitory potential
of the TSA-containing oligo. Moreover, adjacent nucleotides proximal
to the TSA define the selectivity for binding and concomitant inhibition
of a particular A3 family member as in the case of selective inhibition
of A3GCTD by Oligo-7 and not by Oligo-9 (Figure A). These sequence-dependent
molecular recognition properties provide opportunities for the design
of specific inhibitors of A3 family members.Through high-throughput
screening efforts, covalent small molecule
A3G inhibitors with low micromolar potencies have been identified.[33,55] To date, no small molecule A3A or A3B inhibitors have been reported.
Chemically modified ssDNAs have been utilized in previous studies
to understand the deamination of cytosine in the absence of structural
information about the ssDNA/A3 complex.[56] Here, we evaluated chemically modified ssDNAs as potential A3 inhibitors
and found similar (micromolar) inhibition constants as found for small
molecule A3G inhibitors. An approximately 10–30-fold decrease
in the apparent inhibition constants (Ki) of dZoligos over Km of the corresponding
dC-containing substrates was observed in our study. In comparison,
zebularine as an individual nucleoside shows a 100-fold lower Ki in comparison to the Km of cytidine for CDA.[54] This indicates
that the preferences for TSA vary between A3 and CDAs. In addition,
the strength of binding of the dZ-ssDNA to the A3 enzyme may be mediated
by the interactions of surrounding nucleotides with amino acids close
to the active site. The latter possibility is supported by the fact
that introduction of modified nucleotides at positions −2 to
+1 substantially affected the rate of deamination (target dC has number
0, nucleotides in the 5′-direction have a minus sign, and nucleotides
in the 3′-direction have a plus sign).[56] Recent work has revealed that ssDNA adopts a U-shape for the target
dC to enter the active site of the protein,[29,30,42] such that nucleotides at positions −2,
−1, and +1 have strong interactions with the proteins, as well.
Our previously published NMR-based method of small changes shows additional
transient interactions with nucleotides farther from the active site.[29] This
also correlates with our observations that short DNA sequences (5-mers)
bind much more weakly than longer ssDNAs (>9-mers) to A3A-E72A
(Tables and 2) and with the results of other groups.[39,40,47]The observed inhibition
of A3 enzymes by dZ-ssDNAs highlights the
importance of Glu72 for A3A (Glu255 for A3BCTD and Glu259
for A3GCTD) in controlling substrate and dZ-ssDNA binding.
Therefore, development of A3 inhibitors based on TSAs that specifically
react with the active-site water requires evaluation on active enzymes
in contrast to the common practice of evaluation of binding to inactive
active-site mutants.Overall, our work shows that transition-state
analogues potently
inhibit selected A3 variants when incorporated into ssDNA. The inhibition
of wild type A3A and full length A3B and A3G is a subject of ongoing
investigations. Nevertheless, our results provide a starting point
to rationally create new A3 inhibitors, which have a potential to
be further developed into adjuvants to be used in antiviral and anticancer
treatments. Because cytidine-containing ssDNA species are not substrates
for CDA,[57] which accepts only individual
nucleotides, our inhibitors for A3 enzymes will not affect primary
metabolic functions of CDA. Taking advantage of different preferences
of A3 for nucleotides surrounding the reactive 2′-deoxycytidine
may also allow development of A3-specific inhibitors, targeting individual
family members.
Authors: Rahul M Kohli; Shaun R Abrams; Kiran S Gajula; Robert W Maul; Patricia J Gearhart; James T Stivers Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Michael B Burns; Lela Lackey; Michael A Carpenter; Anurag Rathore; Allison M Land; Brandon Leonard; Eric W Refsland; Delshanee Kotandeniya; Natalia Tretyakova; Jason B Nikas; Douglas Yee; Nuri A Temiz; Duncan E Donohue; Rebecca M McDougle; William L Brown; Emily K Law; Reuben S Harris Journal: Nature Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: S Venkatesan; R Rosenthal; N Kanu; N McGranahan; J Bartek; S A Quezada; J Hare; R S Harris; C Swanton Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Michael J Grillo; Katherine F M Jones; Michael A Carpenter; Reuben S Harris; Daniel A Harki Journal: Trends Pharmacol Sci Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 17.638
Authors: Maksim V Kvach; Fareeda M Barzak; Stefan Harjes; Henry A M Schares; Harikrishnan M Kurup; Katherine F Jones; Lorraine Sutton; John Donahue; Richard T D'Aquila; Geoffrey B Jameson; Daniel A Harki; Kurt L Krause; Elena Harjes; Vyacheslav V Filichev Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Fareeda M Barzak; Timothy M Ryan; Nazanin Mohammadzadeh; Stefan Harjes; Maksim V Kvach; Harikrishnan M Kurup; Kurt L Krause; Linda Chelico; Vyacheslav V Filichev; Elena Harjes; Geoffrey B Jameson Journal: Viruses Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 5.818
Authors: Fareeda M Barzak; Timothy M Ryan; Maksim V Kvach; Harikrishnan M Kurup; Hideki Aihara; Reuben S Harris; Vyacheslav V Filichev; Elena Harjes; Geoffrey B Jameson Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 5.048