Literature DB >> 30417394

Fixed drug eruption caused by fluconazole-An underdiagnosed but recurrent problem.

Tamara Quint1, Stefan Wöhrl2, Tamar Kinaciyan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  case report; drug provocation test; fixed drug eruption; fluconazole; patch test; skin testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30417394      PMCID: PMC6587866          DOI: 10.1111/cod.13149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


× No keyword cloud information.
Fixed drug eruptions (FDEs) account for ∼16% of all cutaneous drug reactions. The FDE is characterized by recurrence at the same site after repeated exposure to a causative drug.1, 2 The current concept of the pathogenesis focuses on a specific CD8– T cell‐mediated delayed‐type hypersensitivity reaction resulting from local reactivation of memory T lymphocytes in epidermal and dermal tissues.3

CASE REPORT

A 66‐year‐old woman was referred to our outpatient allergy clinic because of a possible drug hypersensitivity reaction after she had taken a single 150‐mg fluconazole tablet for tinea pedis 3 months previously. She reported burning, macular erythematous lesions on both lower legs that resolved within 7 days without any treatment, leaving faint post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation. On further inquiry, she recalled a history of similar episodes in the same location approximately 1 and 2 years previously. The intermittent nature of the flares and the macular hyperpigmentation were clinically suggestive of a fixed drug eruption (FDE). For further diagnosis, the patient was tested intradermally with intravenous preparations of fluconazole, voriconazole and metronidazole on the left volar lower arm, with late readings at 24 and 48 hours. Additional patch tests were performed with the same medications as above, “as is”, and itraconazole oral solution soaked on filter paper on the dorsal part of her left upper arm, as well as in terms of a local provocation test on pigmented areas on her left leg. Further patch tests were performed on the upper right arm and in previously lesional (FDE) skin on the right leg with commercially available topical preparations of terbinafine, isoconazole, and ketoconazole. Large Finn Chambers were used. As all skin tests gave negative results, an oral drug provocation test (DPT) with 150 mg of fluconazole was performed, and induced reappearance of the FDE (Figures 1 and 2) 5 hours later. A skin biopsy from the lesion on the left palm confirmed the diagnosis of FDE (Figure S1). To evaluate possible cross‐reactivity with structurally related substances, additional oral DPTs were performed later with 100 mg of itraconazole and 500 mg of the structurally related antibiotic metronidazole; these were well tolerated.
Figure 1

Well‐circumscribed round erythematous macules and plaques on both lower legs

Figure 2

Well‐circumscribed round erythematous macules and plaques on palms

Well‐circumscribed round erythematous macules and plaques on both lower legs Well‐circumscribed round erythematous macules and plaques on palms

DISCUSSION

Acute FDE lesions can develop within 30 minutes to 8 hours after drug administration.4, 5 Lesions are clinically characterized as single or multiple, sharply demarcated, round or oval erythematous patches or plaques that may become vesicular or bullous.6 Because of the diversity of clinical pictures, the correct diagnosis may sometimes be difficult to achieve. With repeated exposure, new lesions can appear, and the previous lesions may increase in size.7 Barbiturates, antibiotics (sulfonamides, tetracyclines, penicillin, and erythromycin) and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs are common and well‐known causative agents. Oral antifungal agents, such as fluconazole, are rarely associated with FDE, and FDE caused by these is often underdiagnosed. Since approval was given to fluconazole in 1989, there have been only 26 case reports published in MEDLINE, which means that we add our case as the 27th case of FDE caused by fluconazole to the medical literature. Cross‐reactivity was previously observed among antifungals, especially within the structurally related triazole group.8, 9, 10 No cross‐reactivity was observed in our patient, either to the alternative antifungal itraconazole or to the structurally similar antibiotic metronidazole. Another important point illustrated by our case is the limited sensitivity of skin tests. In cases with negative skin test results, it is essential to perform a DPT in order to confirm or exclude the diagnosis. In conclusion, our case highlights the importance of, and need for, awareness among medical practitioners that even the often‐prescribed and generally well‐tolerated fluconazole can, from time to time, cause FDEs. Fluconazole should therefore be added to the list of FDE‐inducing drugs.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interests. Figure S1. Spongiotic epidermis, hydropic degeneration of the basal cell layer and a predominantly intradermal and perivascular (around the small vessels) lymphocytic and eosinophilic infiltrate in the upper dermis. Click here for additional data file.
  11 in total

1.  Fixed drug eruption due to fluconazole.

Authors:  H Heikkilä; K Timonen; S Stubb
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Fixed drug eruption due to fluconazole: a third case.

Authors:  Pierre-Dominique Ghislain; Emile Ghislain
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Fluconazole induced fixed drug eruption: a rare offender.

Authors:  Ashima Goel; Chanchal Jain
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.005

4.  Fixed drug eruption caused by itraconazole: Reactivity and cross reactivity.

Authors:  Rajan Gupta; Gurvinder P Thami
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  A young woman with recurrent vesicles on the lower lip: fixed drug eruption mimicking herpes simplex.

Authors:  Frauke Benedix; Melany Schilling; Martin Schaller; Martin Röcken; Tilo Biedermann
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.437

Review 6.  Fixed drug eruption caused by fluconazole: a case report and mini-review of the literature.

Authors:  Noriaki Nakai; Norito Katoh
Journal:  Allergol Int       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Fixed drug eruption with fluconazole.

Authors:  J M Morgan; A J Carmichael
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-12

8.  Fixed drug eruption resulting from fluconazole use: a case report.

Authors:  Mahkam Tavallaee; Mahnaz Mahmoudi Rad
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-07-06

9.  Fluconazole-induced Fixed Drug Eruption.

Authors:  Cory Allen Gaiser; Dominick Sabatino
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-03

10.  Fixed drug eruption caused by fluconazole-An underdiagnosed but recurrent problem.

Authors:  Tamara Quint; Stefan Wöhrl; Tamar Kinaciyan
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fixed drug eruption caused by fluconazole-An underdiagnosed but recurrent problem.

Authors:  Tamara Quint; Stefan Wöhrl; Tamar Kinaciyan
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.600

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.