| Literature DB >> 30416925 |
Marian Nowak1, Marcin Jesionek1, Barbara Solecka1, Piotr Szperlich1, Piotr Duka1, Anna Starczewska1.
Abstract
Background: Applications of two-dimensional (2D) materials in electronic devices require the development of appropriate measuring methods for determining their typical semiconductor parameters, i.e., mobility and carrier lifetime. Among these methods, contactless techniques and mobility extraction methods based on field-effect measurements are of great importance.Entities:
Keywords: 2D materials; carrier mobility; contactless investigations; graphene; photomagnetoelectric effect
Year: 2018 PMID: 30416925 PMCID: PMC6204781 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.9.256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1A schematic of the magnetic moment evoked by the PME circulating current in a point-illuminated 2D semiconductor in Corbino configuration (– vector of external magnetic field induction; the green wavey arrow represents illumination; the green, partially transparent circle shows the illuminated area of the sample; the plus and minus signs represent the photogenerated electrons and holes separated by the magnetic field; IPME – the circulating PME current).
Figure 2The calculated dependences of the PME magnetic flux: (a) vs the illumination intensity for different values of the beam radius (B = 0.5 T; μ = 1 m2V−1s−1; τ = 10−10 s); (b) vs the beam radius for varying values of the magnetic field (μ = 1 m2V−1s−1; τ = 10−10 s; IV0 = 1021 photons/(m2s)); (c) vs the magnetic field for varying values of carrier mobility (Rb = 1 mm; τ = 10−10 s; IV0 = 1021 photons/(m2s)).
Figure 3Theoretical dependence of the PME magnetic flux: (a) vs the carrier lifetime for different values of carrier mobility (B = 0.5 T; Rb = 1 mm; IV0 = 1021 photons/(m2s)); (b) vs the carrier mobility at varying values of magnetic field (τ = 10−10 s, Rb = 1 mm, and IV0 = 1021 photons/(m2s)).
Figure 4Schematic presentation (a) of the measuring set up used for the induction technique of PME investigations of a point-illuminated 2D semiconductor in Corbino configuration (V – nanovoltmeter connected to a measuring coil; L – electronically chopped light source; the other symbols have the same meanings as in Figure 1); (b) 2D and (c) 3D mapping of the illumination intensity; and (d) a picture of the main part of the measurement set up.
Figure 5Voltage response in PME contactless investigations of graphene: (a) the time dependence for different values of magnetic field (black circles – B = 0; red squares – B = 0.45 T; I = 7.5·1021 photons/(m2s); f = 72 kHz; ↑ and ↓ – represent switch on and switch off points of sinusoidally modulated illumination); (b) dependence on magnetic field induction (I = 2.6·1022 photons/(m2s); f = 72 kHz); (c) dependence on illumination intensity for varying magnetic field (black squares – B = 0.35 T; red triangles – B = 0.45 T; f = 72 kHz ); (d) dependence on frequency of illumination chopping (I = 2.6·1022 photons/(m2s); B = 0.45 T); symbols – the experimental data; solid lines – linear dependences calculated for the best fitted values.
Figure 6Schematic representation (a) of a back-gated sample used for the PME-Corbino investigations of graphene with electrostatically tunable carrier density; (b) PME voltage response vs gate voltage (B = 0.45 T; I = 2.6·1022 photons/(m2s); f = 72 kHz; the inserts depicts the positions of the Fermi energy in the conduction and valence bands); (c) product of mobility and lifetime (left axis) as well as the mobility (right axis) of electrons (black squares) and holes (red triangles) vs electric field (bottom axis) and concentration of electrostatically induced carriers (top axis); (d) difference between electron and hole mobilities vs electric field (bottom axis) and concentration of electrostatically induced carriers (top axis).