| Literature DB >> 28243553 |
Alexandra V Galeeva1, Ivan V Krylov1, Konstantin A Drozdov1, Anatoly F Knjazev2, Alexey V Kochura3, Alexander P Kuzmenko3, Vasily S Zakhvalinskii4, Sergey N Danilov5, Ludmila I Ryabova6, Dmitry R Khokhlov1.
Abstract
We demonstrate that measurements of the photo-electromagnetic effect using terahertz laser radiation provide an argument for the existence of highly conductive surface electron states with a spin texture in Dirac semimetals (Cd1-x Zn x )3As2. We performed a study on a range of (Cd1-x Zn x )3As2 mixed crystals undergoing a transition from the Dirac semimetal phase with an inverse electron energy spectrum to trivial a semiconductor with a direct spectrum in the crystal bulk by varying the composition x. We show that for the Dirac semimetal phase, the photo-electromagnetic effect amplitude is defined by the number of incident radiation quanta, whereas for the trivial semiconductor phase, it depends on the laser pulse power, irrespective of wavelength. We assume that such behavior is attributed to a strong damping of the interelectron interaction in the Dirac semimetal phase compared to the trivial semiconductor, which may be due to the formation of surface electron states with a spin texture in Dirac semimetals.Entities:
Keywords: Dirac semimetal; photo-electromagnetic effect; terahertz radiation; topological insulator
Year: 2017 PMID: 28243553 PMCID: PMC5302011 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.8.17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
The values of resistivity, ρ, free electron concentration, n, and mobility, μ, for (Cd1−Zn)3As2 samples at T = 4.2 K.
| ρ, mΩ∙cm | μ, 105 cm2/(V∙s) | ||
| 0.012 | 0.064 | 1.8 | 5.65 |
| 0.045 | 0.157 | 4.0 | 1.01 |
| 0.25 | 0.061 | 3.4 | 3.05 |
Figure 1Dependence of the PEM effect amplitude on the magnetic field B applied for (Cd1−Zn)3As2 samples for alloy compositions x = 0.012, 0.045 and 0.25. The laser wavelength was λ = 90 μm and T = 4.2 K. The experimental geometry is shown in the upper left inset. Typical shape of the laser pulse and PEM response are shown in the lower right inset.
Figure 2(a) Dependence of the PEM effect amplitude UPEM on the incident laser radiation power P at T = 4.2 K for laser wavelengths 90 and 148 μm for a (Cd0.75Zn0.25)3As2 sample in trivial insulator phase. Inset: The same data plotted as PEM effect amplitude versus number of incident quanta N. (b) Dependence of the PEM effect amplitude on the flux of incident radiation quanta N at T = 4.2 K for laser wavelengths 90 and 148 μm for a (Cd0.955Zn0.045)3As2 sample in the Dirac semimetal phase. Inset: The same data plotted as PEM effect amplitude versus incident radiation power P. The lines in the panels (a) and (b) are the guides for the eye.