Literature DB >> 17484547

The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.

David De Cremer1, Tom R Tyler.   

Abstract

The present research examined the effect of procedural fairness and trust in an authority on people's willingness to cooperate with the authority across a wide range of social situations. Prior research has shown that the presence of information about whether an authority can be trusted moderates the effect of procedural fairness. If no trust information is available, procedural fairness influences people's reactions. This is not the case when information about the trustworthiness of the authority is present. In the present article, it is argued that information about whether the authority can or cannot be trusted may also moderate the effect of procedural fairness in predicting levels of cooperation. Assuming that the use of fair procedures by authorities that cannot be trusted is less influential than is the enactment of procedures by trustworthy authorities, it is predicted that trust in authority moderates the influence of procedural fairness on cooperation in such a way that procedural fairness has a positive effect on cooperation primarily when trust in authority is high. Results from 4 studies (2 experimental studies and 2 field studies) provide supportive evidence for this interaction. 2007 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484547     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  6 in total

1.  "They Can't Search Her": How Gender Imbalances in the Police Force Contribute to Perceptions of Procedural Unfairness.

Authors:  Madeleine Novich; Anne Li Kringen; Geoffrey Hunt
Journal:  Fem Criminol       Date:  2018-01-24

2.  The Research on Organizational Justice in Scopus Indexed Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis of Seven Decades.

Authors:  Muhammad Irfan Sheeraz; Ungku Norulkamar Ungku Ahmad; Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq; Muhammad Sarfraz; Khalil Md Nor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-10

3.  Factors Influencing Adjustment to Remote Work: Employees' Initial Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ward van Zoonen; Anu Sivunen; Kirsimarja Blomqvist; Thomas Olsson; Annina Ropponen; Kaisa Henttonen; Matti Vartiainen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Serial Multiple Mediation Analyses: How to Enhance Individual Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response to Environmental Disasters.

Authors:  Yuxiang Hong; Taesam Lee; Jong-Suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  How Interpersonal Justice Shapes Legitimacy Perceptions: The Role of Interpersonal Justice Trajectories and Current Experience.

Authors:  Juan Liang; Bibo Xu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-23

6.  Trust predicts COVID-19 prescribed and discretionary behavioral intentions in 23 countries.

Authors:  Stefano Pagliaro; Simona Sacchi; Maria Giuseppina Pacilli; Marco Brambilla; Francesca Lionetti; Karim Bettache; Mauro Bianchi; Marco Biella; Virginie Bonnot; Mihaela Boza; Fabrizio Butera; Suzan Ceylan-Batur; Kristy Chong; Tatiana Chopova; Charlie R Crimston; Belén Álvarez; Isabel Cuadrado; Naomi Ellemers; Magdalena Formanowicz; Verena Graupmann; Theofilos Gkinopoulos; Evelyn Hye Kyung Jeong; Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti; Jolanda Jetten; Kabir Muhib Bin; Yanhui Mao; Christine McCoy; Farah Mehnaz; Anca Minescu; David Sirlopú; Andrej Simić; Giovanni Travaglino; Ayse K Uskul; Cinzia Zanetti; Anna Zinn; Elena Zubieta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.