| Literature DB >> 30416206 |
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia1, Stephanie V Wormington2, Kate E Snyder3, Jan Riggsbee4, Tony Perez5, Adar Ben-Eliyahu6, Nancy E Hill7.
Abstract
Two studies were conducted with distinct samples to investigate how motivational beliefs cohere and function together (i.e., motivational profiles) and predict academic adjustment. Integrating across motivational theories, participants (N Study 1 = 160 upper elementary students; N Study 2 = 325 college students) reported on multiple types of motivation (achievement goals, task value, perceived competence) for schooling more generally (Study 1) and in science (Study 2). Three profiles characterized by Moderate-High All, Intrinsic and Confident, and Average All motivation were identified in both studies. Profiles characterized by Very High All motivation (Study 1) and Moderate Intrinsic and Confident (Study 2) were also present. Across studies, the Moderate-High All and Intrinsic and Confident profiles were associated with the highest academic engagement and achievement. Findings highlight the benefit of integrating across motivational theories when creating motivational profiles, provide initial evidence regarding similarities and differences in integrative motivational profiles across distinct samples, and identify which motivational combinations are associated with beneficial academic outcomes in two educational contexts.Entities:
Keywords: achievement goals; motivation; perceived competence; person-oriented; task value
Year: 2018 PMID: 30416206 PMCID: PMC6220891 DOI: 10.1037/edu0000245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Psychol ISSN: 0022-0663