Literature DB >> 20438145

A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?

Chris S Hulleman1, Sheree M Schrager, Shawn M Bodmann, Judith M Harackiewicz.   

Abstract

This meta-analysis addresses whether achievement goal researchers are using different labels for the same constructs or putting the same labels on different constructs. We systematically examined whether conceptual and methodological differences in the measurement of achievement goals moderated achievement goal intercorrelations and relationships with outcomes. We reviewed 243 correlational studies of self-reported achievement goals comprising a total of 91,087 participants. The items used to measure achievement goals were coded as being goal relevant (future-focused, cognitively represented, competence-related end states that the individual approaches or avoids) and were categorized according to the different conceptual definitions found within the literature. The results indicated that achievement goal-outcome and goal-goal correlations differed significantly depending on the goal scale chosen, the individual items used to assess goal strivings, and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample under study. For example, performance-approach goal scales coded as having a majority of normatively referenced items had a positive correlation with performance outcomes (r = .14), whereas scales with a majority of appearance and evaluative items had a negative relationship (r = -.14). Mastery-approach goal scales that contained goal-relevant language were not significantly related to performance outcomes (r = .05), whereas those that did not contain goal-relevant language had a positive relationship with performance outcomes (r = .14). We concluded that achievement goal researchers are using the same label for conceptually different constructs. This discrepancy between conceptual and operational definitions and the absence of goal-relevant language in achievement goal measures may be preventing productive theory testing, research synthesis, and practical application. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438145     DOI: 10.1037/a0018947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  49 in total

1.  Achievement goal orientation and situational motivation for a low-stakes test of content knowledge.

Authors:  Rhonda A Waskiewicz
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  An international comparison study of pharmacy students' achievement goals and their relationship to assessment type and scores.

Authors:  Saleh Alrakaf; Claire Anderson; Sion A Coulman; Dai N John; June Tordoff; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?

Authors:  David S Yeager; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020-12

4.  Goal orientation and self-efficacy in relation to memory in adulthood.

Authors:  Erin C Hastings; Robin L West
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2011-07

5.  Investigating the relationship between pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations and preferred teacher qualities.

Authors:  Saleh Alrakaf; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Identifying achievement goals and their relationship to academic achievement in undergraduate pharmacy students.

Authors:  Saleh Alrakaf; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Multiple Pathways to Success: An Examination of Integrative Motivational Profiles Among Upper Elementary and College Students.

Authors:  Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia; Stephanie V Wormington; Kate E Snyder; Jan Riggsbee; Tony Perez; Adar Ben-Eliyahu; Nancy E Hill
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2018-03-08

8.  Raising the stakes: How students' motivation for mathematics associates with high- and low-stakes test achievement.

Authors:  Rahila M Simzar; Marcela Martinez; Teomara Rutherford; Thurston Domina; AnneMarie M Conley
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2015-04

9.  Complex problem solving: Profiles and developmental paths revealed via latent transition analysis.

Authors:  Maida Mustafić; Jing Yu; Matthias Stadler; Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen; Marc H Bornstein; Diane L Putnick; Samuel Greiff
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2019-07-25

10.  Diversifying Science: Intervention Programs Moderate the Effect of Stereotype Threat on Motivation and Career Choice.

Authors:  Anna Woodcock; Paul R Hernandez; P Wesley Schultz
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2015-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.