Literature DB >> 12151900

Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Daxes M Banit1, Herbert Kaufer, James M Hartford.   

Abstract

A prospective study of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for frozen sections against cultures obtained at the time of revision total joint replacement was done. One hundred twenty-one revision total joint replacements were done in 92 men and 29 women. A positive frozen section with more than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field was compared with the intraoperative cultures. Twenty-one patients who had revision surgery had greater than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field. Of these, 14 patients had positive cultures. The remaining 100 patients had less than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field, but seven had positive cultures. Statistical analysis of frozen sections for all total joint arthroplasties revealed a 67% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 67% positive predictive value, and 93% negative predictive value. Analysis of frozen sections for total hip arthroplasties revealed a 45% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 55% positive predictive value, and 88% negative predictive value. Analysis for total knee arthroplasties revealed 100% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 82% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. Comparisons of sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value between total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty were significant. The results indicate that the use of intraoperative frozen section analysis with greater than 10 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high power field as an indication of infection lacks the positive predictive value and sensitivity for accurate determination of prosthetic infection at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty. Frozen sections have an acceptable sensitivity and positive predictive value in total knee arthroplasty. The results of the current study show the limitation of using frozen sections as a diagnostic test for infection in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12151900     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200208000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

1.  Infections Associated with Prosthetic Knee and Prosthetic Hip.

Authors:  Joseph R Lentino
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Role of universal 16S rRNA gene PCR and sequencing in diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  M Marín; J M Garcia-Lechuz; P Alonso; M Villanueva; L Alcalá; M Gimeno; E Cercenado; M Sánchez-Somolinos; C Radice; E Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative Gram stains.

Authors:  Margret Oethinger; Debra K Warner; Susan A Schindler; Hideo Kobayashi; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; L Gerdesmeyer; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revision surgery: intraoperative frozen section analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Francés Borrego; Fernando Marco Martínez; Juan Luis Cebrian Parra; David Serfaty Grañeda; Rodrigo García Crespo; Luis López-Durán Stern
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Histopathologic diagnosis of infectious loosening of joint prostheses].

Authors:  I Bos; M Zagorski; C Boos; S Krüger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  [CD15 focus score for diagnostics of periprosthetic joint infections : Neutrophilic granulocytes quantification mode and the development of morphometric software (CD15 quantifier)].

Authors:  B Kölbel; S Wienert; J Dimitriadis; D Kendoff; T Gehrke; M Huber; L Frommelt; A Tiemann; K Saeger; V Krenn
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Use of chloroacetate esterase staining for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  T G Kashima; Y Inagaki; G Grammatopoulos; N A Athanasou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Combining C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 may be useful to detect periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Martin A Buttaro; Ignacio Tanoira; Fernando Comba; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Siraj A Sayeed; Qais Naziri; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.