Literature DB >> 17606776

Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation.

Nelson V Greidanus1, Bassam A Masri, Donald S Garbuz, S Darrin Wilson, M Gavan McAlinden, Min Xu, Clive P Duncan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of several diagnostic tests, there is still no perfect test for the diagnosis of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level for the assessment of infection in patients presenting for revision total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one knees in 145 patients presenting for revision total knee arthroplasty were evaluated prospectively for the presence of infection with measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein level. The characteristics of these tests were assessed with use of two different techniques: first, receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal positivity criterion for the diagnostic test, and, second, previously accepted criteria for establishing positivity of the tests were used.
RESULTS: A diagnosis of infection was established for forty-five of the 151 knees that underwent revision total knee arthroplasty. The receiver-operating-characteristic curves indicated that the optimal positivity criterion was 22.5 mm/hr for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and 13.5 mg/L for the C-reactive protein level. Both the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.83; positive likelihood ratio, 5.81; accuracy, 0.86) and the C-reactive protein level (sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.86; positive likelihood ratio, 6.89; accuracy, 0.88) have excellent diagnostic test performance.
CONCLUSIONS: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein level provide excellent diagnostic test information for establishing the presence or absence of infection prior to surgical intervention in patients with pain at the site of a knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17606776     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  66 in total

Review 1.  [Septic endoprosthesis exchange : Preoperative diagnosis and reimplantation].

Authors:  H M L Mühlhofer; J Schauwecker; I J Banke; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher R Gooding; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for total joint replacement surgery: results of a survey of Canadian orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Justin de Beer; Danielle Petruccelli; Coleman Rotstein; Brad Weening; Katie Royston; Mitch Winemaker
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Diagnosis of infected total knee: findings of a multicenter database.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Peter Sharkey; Ajay Aggarwal; R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Prosthetic Joint Infections: an Update.

Authors:  C L Abad; A Haleem
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 6.  Diagnostic parameters in periprosthetic infections: the current state of the literature.

Authors:  G Mattiassich; R Ortmaier; F Rittenschober; J Hochreiter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-15

7.  Are Nucleated Cell Counts Useful in the Diagnosis of Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture?

Authors:  Stephen Preston; Lyndsay Somerville; Brent Lanting; James Howard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [C-reactive protein. An independent risk factor for the development of infection after primary arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Pfitzner; D Krocker; C Perka; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and orthopedic implant infection.

Authors:  Kerryl E Piper; Marta Fernandez-Sampedro; Kathryn E Steckelberg; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Melissa J Karau; James M Steckelberg; Elie F Berbari; Douglas R Osmon; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen; Robert H Cofield; John W Sperling; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Paul M Huddleston; Mark B Dekutoski; Michael Yaszemski; Bradford Currier; Robin Patel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A preformed antibiotic-loaded spacer for treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder.

Authors:  B Magnan; M Bondi; E Vecchini; E Samaila; T Maluta; C Dall'Oca
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.