Literature DB >> 30412449

Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.

Kristen H Kjerulff1, Laura B Attanasio2, Joyce K Edmonds3, John T Repke4.   

Abstract

Background: Nearly a third of women in the United States deliver by cesarean at first childbirth. The extent to which women's prenatal mode of delivery preference contributes to the cesarean decision is not clear. Little research has measured pregnant nulliparous women's prelabor mode of delivery preference in relation to actual mode of delivery in the United States. Materials and
Methods: A total of 3006 pregnant nulliparous women were asked about mode of delivery preference during pregnancy as part of the First Baby Study, a prospective study of women delivering in Pennsylvania hospitals, 2009-2011. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between women's preference for cesarean delivery and two decision stages: (1) the decision to have planned prelabor cesarean and (2) the intrapartum decision to have unplanned cesarean among those attempting vaginal delivery, adjusting for confounders.
Results: Overall, 3.1% preferred cesarean delivery, 3.0% had no preference, and 93.9% preferred vaginal. Among those who preferred vaginal delivery, 4% had a planned cesarean; among those with no preference, 13.3% did; and among those who preferred cesarean, 33.7% did. In adjusted models, preference for cesarean was strongly associated with having planned prelabor cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.26-11.12), but was not significantly associated with unplanned cesarean among those who attempted vaginal delivery (aOR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.77-2.38). Conclusions: Although preference for cesarean delivery among nulliparous women was uncommon, women who preferred cesarean were more likely to have planned prelabor cesarean delivery than those who preferred vaginal delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mode of delivery; nulliparous; patient preference; planned cesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30412449      PMCID: PMC6590717          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  20 in total

1.  Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Susan Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Emily B Kahn; Cynthia J Berg; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kimberly D Gregory; Lisa M Korst; Jeffrey A Gornbein; Lawrence D Platt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?

Authors:  Dorthe Fuglenes; Eline Aas; Grete Botten; Pål Øian; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Mode of first delivery and women's intentions for subsequent childbearing: findings from the First Baby Study.

Authors:  Kristen H Kjerulff; Diana L Velott; Junjia Zhu; Cynthia H Chuang; Marianne M Hillemeier; Ian M Paul; John T Repke
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 6.  Decision making for primary cesarean delivery: the role of patient and provider preferences.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 7.  A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.

Authors:  Jenny Gamble; Debra K Creedy; Chris McCourt; Jane Weaver; Sarah Beake
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394, December 2007. Cesarean delivery on maternal request.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

View more
  1 in total

1.  Delivery Mode Preference and Associated Factors among Pregnant Mothers in Harar Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Fissaha Tekulu Welay; Berhanu Gebresilassie; Guesh Gebreayezgi Asefa; Meresa Berwo Mengesha
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.