Literature DB >> 23009973

Decision making for primary cesarean delivery: the role of patient and provider preferences.

Anjali J Kaimal1, Miriam Kuppermann.   

Abstract

Primary cesarean delivery requires both the clinical assessment and judgment of the provider performing the procedure and the consent of the patient. The interaction between patient and provider and the relative weight and influence of patient preferences and provider recommendations may vary depending on whether a cesarean delivery is planned or unplanned, elective or indicated; understanding the range of contexts in which decision making takes place and the interplay of patient and provider factors in each of these situations is crucial to identifying ways to impact the cesarean rate that are safe and acceptable to both patients and providers. We conducted a review of the literature on patient and provider preferences and obstetrical decision making in the context of primary cesarean delivery, and offer recommendations for future research directions, including potential interventions that may impact the patient and provider factors affecting the primary cesarean rate.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009973     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  8 in total

1.  Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  Kristen H Kjerulff; Laura B Attanasio; Joyce K Edmonds; John T Repke
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn A Houston; Erica Wu; Mari-Paule Thiet; Sanae Nakagawa; Aaron B Caughey; Atoosa Firouzian; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Attitudes toward medicalization in childbirth and their relationship with locus of control and coping in a Spanish population.

Authors:  Maite Espinosa; Isabel Artieta-Pinedo; Carmen Paz-Pascual; Paola Bully-Garay; Arturo García-Álvarez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery and actual delivery mode: Variation by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Rachel R Hardeman; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Effect of Social Factors on Cesarean Birth in Primiparous Women: A Cross Sectional Study (Social Factors and Cesarean Birth).

Authors:  Can Oner; Binali Catak; Sevinç Sütlü; Selçuk Kilinç
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 7.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Physician-patient communication in decision-making about Caesarean sections in eight district hospitals in Bangladesh: a mixed-method study.

Authors:  Sathyanarayanan Doraiswamy; Sk Masum Billah; Farhana Karim; Md Shahjahan Siraj; Alan Buckingham; Carol Kingdon
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.