| Literature DB >> 30410574 |
Dayu Yu1,2, Xiaoning Wang1,2, Xue Fan1,3, Huimin Ren1,2, Shuang Hu1,2, Lei Wang1,2, Yunfen Shi1,2, Na Liu4, Nan Qiao1,4,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The release of refined soybean oil wastewater (RSOW) with a high chemical oxygen demand (COD) and oil content burdens the environment. The conversion of RSOW into lipids by oleaginous yeasts may be a good way to turn this waste into usable products.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiesel; Chemical oxygen demand; Microbial oil; Oil content; Refined soybean oil wastewater; Trichosporon fermentans; Wastewater treatment
Year: 2018 PMID: 30410574 PMCID: PMC6211406 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1306-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1COD, oil content, TP and NH4+-N removals, glucose consumption, pH variation (a), palmitic acid, linoleic acid, oleic acid, and stearic acid consumption (b), biomass, lipid concentration, and lipid content (c), and GC analysis of the fatty acids including palmitic acid (1), linoleic acid (2), oleic acid (3), and stearic acid (4) in the RSOW and microbial lipids (d) of T. fermentans cultivation in the RSOW. The data represent the mean ± SD for triplicate samples
Fatty acid composition of the lipids from T. fermentans in RSOW and other substrates
| Substrate | Fatty acid composition of the lipids (%) | References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmitic acid | Linoleic acid | Oleic acid | Stearic acid | Others | UFAS | ||
| Sweet potato vines hydrolysate | 32.5 | 20.5 | 22.3 | 22.7 | 2.0 | 42.8 | [ |
| Rice straw hydrolysate | 24.6 | 10.5 | 53.2 | 11.7 | – | 68.2 | [ |
| Bagasse hydrolysate | 27.5 | 10.1 | 54.2 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 64.3 | [ |
| Glycerol | 27.5 | 10.1 | 54.2 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 60.0 | [ |
| Molasses | 25.4 | 22.4 | 31.4 | 18.0 | 2.8 | 53.8 | [ |
| RSOW | 19.6 | 36.4 | 35.5 | 8.5 | – | 71.9 | This work |
Fig. 2COD (a), biomass (b), and lipid content (c) of T. fermentans cultivation in PW, SSW, TW, and RSOW, respectively. The data represent the mean ± SD for triplicate samples
Fig. 3Pareto charts obtained after the PB experiment, showing the contribution of factors v/s their main effect on the COD removal
ANOVA for the COD removal according to the response surface quadratic model
| Source | DF | Sum of squares | Mean square | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 9 | 0.49 | 0.054 | 469.25 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
|
| 1 | 1.469E−003 | 1.469E−003 | 12.93 | 0.0088 | |
|
| 1 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 2487.42 | < 0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 3.947E−003 | 3.947E−003 | 34.13 | 0.0006 | |
|
| 1 | 5.510E−006 | 5.510E−006 | 0.048 | 0.8334 | |
|
| 1 | 1.854E−004 | 1.854E−004 | 1.60 | 0.2460 | |
|
| 1 | 6.487E−004 | 6.487E−004 | 5.61 | 0.0497 | |
|
| 1 | 7.089E−004 | 7.089E−004 | 6.13 | 0.0425 | |
|
| 1 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 1612.25 | < 0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 2.391E−003 | 2.391E−003 | 20.68 | 0.0026 | |
| Residual | 7 | 8.097E−004 | 1.157E−004 | |||
| Lack of fit | 3 | 5.689E−004 | 1.896E−004 | 3.15 | 0.1483 | Not significant |
| Pure error | 4 | 2.407E−004 | 6.018E−005 | |||
| Cor total | 16 | 0.49 |
R2 = 0.9983, Adj. R2 = 0.9962, PredR2 = 0.9806, CV = 1.36%
Fig. 4Response surface plots that show the binary interactions of different variables. The interactions between the inoculum concentration and initial pH (a), inoculum concentration and temperature (b), initial pH and temperature (c)
Fig. 5COD and oil content removal, glucose consumption, pH, and DO variation (a), biomass, lipid concentration, and lipid content (b) of T. fermentans cultivation in a 5-L bioreactor with RSOW. The data represent the mean ± SD for triplicate samples
PB experimental design and results with the COD removal as the response variable
| Independent variables | Response | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run |
|
|
|
| COD removal (%) | |||||||
| 1 | 20 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 100 | − 1 | 10,350 | 0 | − 1 | 0 | 0 | 56.50 |
| 2 | 30 | 9 | − 1 | 6 | 150 | 1 | 10,350 | 1.0 | − 1 | 0 | 2.0 | 73.01 |
| 3 | 20 | 6 | − 1 | 2 | 100 | − 1 | 10,350 | 1.0 | − 1 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 55.18 |
| 4 | 20 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 150 | 1 | 19,020 | 1.0 | − 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 41.80 |
| 5 | 30 | 6 | − 1 | 2 | 150 | − 1 | 19,020 | 0 | − 1 | 0 | 0 | 70.08 |
| 6 | 20 | 6 | − 1 | 6 | 100 | 1 | 19,020 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 89.36 |
| 7 | 30 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 150 | − 1 | 10,350 | 1.0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 81.38 |
| 8 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 100 | − 1 | 19,020 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 2.0 | 67.10 |
| 9 | 20 | 9 | − 1 | 6 | 150 | − 1 | 19,020 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 47.94 |
| 10 | 30 | 9 | − 1 | 2 | 100 | 1 | 10,350 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 57.80 |
| 11 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 150 | 1 | 10,350 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.0 | 39.02 |
| 12 | 30 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 100 | 1 | 19,020 | 0 | − 1 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 87.71 |
BBD for the optimization of the COD removal of the RSOW treated with T. fermentans
| A Coding and levels of experiment factors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Symbol | Code level | ||
| − 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Temperature (°C) |
| 20 | 25 | 30 |
| Initial pH value |
| 5 | 7 | 9 |
| Inoculum concentration (% v/v) |
| 2 | 5 | 8 |