Literature DB >> 30408560

Mineralization in micropores of calcium phosphate scaffolds.

Laurence E Rustom1, Michael J Poellmann2, Amy J Wagoner Johnson3.   

Abstract

With the increasing demand for novel bone repair solutions that overcome the drawbacks of current grafting techniques, the design of artificial bone scaffolds is a central focus in bone regeneration research. Calcium phosphate scaffolds are interesting given their compositional similarity with bone mineral. The majority of studies focus on bone growth in the macropores (>100 µm) of implanted calcium phosphate scaffolds where bone structures such as osteons and trabeculae can form. However, a growing body of research shows that micropores (<50 µm) play an important role not only in improving bone growth in the macropores, but also in providing additional space for bone growth. Bone growth in the micropores of calcium phosphate scaffolds offers major mechanical advantages as it improves the mechanical properties of the otherwise brittle materials, further stabilizes the implant, improves load transfer, and generally enhances osteointegration. In this paper, we review evidence in the literature of bone growth into micropores, emphasizing on identification techniques and conditions under which bone components are observed in the micropores. We also review theories on mineralization and propose mechanisms, mediated by cells or not, by which mineralization may occur in the confined micropore space of calcium phosphate scaffolds. Understanding and validating these mechanisms will allow to better control and enhance mineralization in micropores to improve the design and efficiency of bone implants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The design of synthetic bone scaffolds remains a major focus for engineering solutions to repair damaged and diseased bone. Most studies focus on the design of and growth in macropores (>100 µm), however research increasingly shows the importance of microporosity (<50 µm). Micropores provide an additional space for bone growth, which provides multiple mechanical advantages to the scaffold/bone composite. Here, we review evidence of bone growth into micropores in calcium phosphate scaffolds and conditions under which growth occurs in micropores, and we propose mechanisms that enable or facilitate growth in these pores. Understanding these mechanisms will allow researchers to exploit them and improve the design and efficiency of bone implants.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; Calcium phosphate; Micropore; Mineralization; Scaffold

Year:  2018        PMID: 30408560     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  12 in total

Review 1.  The Osteoinductivity of Calcium Phosphate-Based Biomaterials: A Tight Interaction With Bone Healing.

Authors:  Yuchen Zhang; Tianyu Shu; Silin Wang; Zhongbo Liu; Yilong Cheng; Ang Li; Dandan Pei
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Multiscale porosity in mesoporous bioglass 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  M Natividad Gómez-Cerezo; Juan Peña; Sašo Ivanovski; Daniel Arcos; María Vallet-Regí; Cedryck Vaquette
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  Effects of ultraviolet irradiation on beta-tricalcium phosphate as a bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Akinori Moroi; Akihiro Takayama; Go Kobayashi; Koichiro Ueki
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Biomimetic Composite Scaffold Based on Naturally Derived Biomaterials.

Authors:  Ionela Andreea Neacsu; Adriana Petruta Serban; Adrian Ionut Nicoara; Roxana Trusca; Vladimir Lucian Ene; Florin Iordache
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.329

5.  Microporosity Clustering Assessment in Calcium Phosphate Bioceramic Particles.

Authors:  Raúl Vallejos Baier; Isabel Benjumeda Wijnhoven; Víctor Irribarra Del Valle; Carola Millán Giovanetti; Juan F Vivanco
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-18

6.  Preliminary Studies on Graphene-Reinforced 3D Products Obtained by the One-Stage Sacrificial Template Method for Bone Reconstruction Applications.

Authors:  Aura-Cătălina Mocanu; Florin Miculescu; George E Stan; Robert-Cătălin Ciocoiu; Mihai Cosmin Corobea; Marian Miculescu; Lucian Toma Ciocan
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-02-12

7.  Influence of Culture Period on Osteoblast Differentiation of Tissue-Engineered Bone Constructed by Apatite-Fiber Scaffolds Using Radial-Flow Bioreactor.

Authors:  Kitaru Suzuki; Jun Fukasawa; Maiko Miura; Poon Nian Lim; Michiyo Honda; Tomokazu Matsuura; Mamoru Aizawa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  3D-Printed HA-Based Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration: Microporosity, Osteoconduction and Osteoclastic Resorption.

Authors:  Chafik Ghayor; Indranil Bhattacharya; Julien Guerrero; Mutlu Özcan; Franz E Weber
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Comparison between the induced membrane technique and distraction osteogenesis in treating segmental bone defects: An experimental study in a rat model.

Authors:  Zhen Shen; Haixiong Lin; Guoqian Chen; Yan Zhang; Zige Li; Ding Li; Lei Xie; Yue Li; Feng Huang; Ziwei Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Bone Healing Materials in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Nonunions and Bone Defects.

Authors:  Emérito Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.