Literature DB >> 33545865

Multiscale porosity in mesoporous bioglass 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration.

M Natividad Gómez-Cerezo1, Juan Peña2, Sašo Ivanovski1, Daniel Arcos2, María Vallet-Regí2, Cedryck Vaquette3.   

Abstract

In order to increase the bone forming ability of MBG-PCL composite scaffold, microporosity was created in the struts of 3D-printed MBG-PCL scaffolds for the manufacturing of a construct with a multiscale porosity consisting of meso- micro- and macropores. 3D-printing imparted macroporosity while the microporosity was created by porogen removal from the struts, and the MBG particles were responsible for the mesoporosity. The scaffolds were 3D-printed using a mixture of PCL, MBG and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) particles, subsequently leached out. Microporous-PCL (pPCL) as a negative control, microporous MBG-PCL (pMBG-PCL) and non-microporous-MBG-PCL (MBG-PCL) were investigated. Scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry and micro-computed tomography demonstrated that the PBS removal resulted in the formation of micropores inside the struts with porosity of around 30% for both pPCL and pMBG-PCL, with both constructs displaying an overall porosity of 8090%. In contrast, the MBG-PCL group had a microporosity of 6% and an overall porosity of 70%. Early mineralisation was found in the pMBG-PCL post-leaching out and this resulted in the formation a more homogeneous calcium phosphate layer when using a biomimetic mineralisation assay. Mechanical properties ranged from 5 to 25 MPa for microporous and non-microporous specimens, hence microporosity was the determining factor affecting compressive properties. MC3T3-E1 metabolic activity was increased in the pMBG-PCL along with an increased production of RUNX2. Therefore, the microporosity within a 3D-printed bioceramic composite construct may result in additional physical and biological benefits.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone tissue engineering; Mesoporous bioactive glasses; Osteogenesis; Porosity; Scaffolds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33545865      PMCID: PMC7116703          DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  54 in total

Review 1.  Bone tissue engineering and spinal fusion: the potential of hybrid constructs by combining osteoprogenitor cells and scaffolds.

Authors:  M C Kruyt; S M van Gaalen; F C Oner; A J Verbout; J D de Bruijn; W J A Dhert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Highly ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses with superior in vitro bone-forming bioactivities.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Yan; Chengzhong Yu; Xufeng Zhou; Jiawei Tang; Dongyuan Zhao
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Osteogenic evaluation of calcium/magnesium-doped mesoporous silica scaffold with incorporation of rhBMP-2 by synchrotron radiation-based μCT.

Authors:  Chenglong Dai; Han Guo; Jingxiong Lu; Jianlin Shi; Jie Wei; Changsheng Liu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Effect of culture conditions and calcium phosphate coating on ectopic bone formation.

Authors:  Cédryck Vaquette; Saso Ivanovski; Stephen M Hamlet; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Characterisation of the surface structure of 3D printed scaffolds for cell infiltration and surgical suturing.

Authors:  Laura Ruiz-Cantu; Andrew Gleadall; Callum Faris; Joel Segal; Kevin Shakesheff; Jing Yang
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 9.954

6.  Bioglass 45S5 stimulates osteoblast turnover and enhances bone formation In vitro: implications and applications for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  I D Xynos; M V Hukkanen; J J Batten; L D Buttery; L L Hench; J M Polak
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W.

Authors:  T Kokubo; H Kushitani; S Sakka; T Kitsugi; T Yamamuro
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-06

8.  The response of pre-osteoblasts and osteoclasts to gallium containing mesoporous bioactive glasses.

Authors:  N Gómez-Cerezo; E Verron; V Montouillout; F Fayon; P Lagadec; J M Bouler; B Bujoli; D Arcos; M Vallet-Regí
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Solid-State P and H NMR Investigations of Amorphous and Crystalline Calcium Phosphates Grown Biomimetically From a Mesoporous Bioactive Glass.

Authors:  Renny Mathew; Philips N Gunawidjaja; Isabel Izquierdo-Barba; Kjell Jansson; Ana García; Daniel Arcos; María Vallet-Regí; Mattias Edén
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Proton Environments in Biomimetic Calcium Phosphates Formed from Mesoporous Bioactive CaO-SiO2-P2O5 Glasses in Vitro: Insights from Solid-State NMR.

Authors:  Renny Mathew; Claudia Turdean-Ionescu; Yang Yu; Baltzar Stevensson; Isabel Izquierdo-Barba; Ana García; Daniel Arcos; María Vallet-Regí; Mattias Edén
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.126

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mesoporous Bioglasses Enriched with Bioactive Agents for Bone Repair, with a Special Highlight of María Vallet-Regí's Contribution.

Authors:  Antonio J Salinas; Pedro Esbrit
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 6.321

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.