Literature DB >> 30408260

How quantitative is metabarcoding: A meta-analytical approach.

Philip D Lamb1, Ewan Hunter2,3, John K Pinnegar2,3, Simon Creer4, Richard G Davies1, Martin I Taylor1.   

Abstract

Metabarcoding has been used in a range of ecological applications such as taxonomic assignment, dietary analysis and the analysis of environmental DNA. However, after a decade of use in these applications there is little consensus on the extent to which proportions of reads generated corresponds to the original proportions of species in a community. To quantify our current understanding, we conducted a structured review and meta-analysis. The analysis suggests that a weak quantitative relationship may exist between the biomass and sequences produced (slope = 0.52 ± 0.34, p < 0.01), albeit with a large degree of uncertainty. None of the tested moderators, sequencing platform type, the number of species used in a trial or the source of DNA, were able to explain the variance. Our current understanding of the factors affecting the quantitative performance of metabarcoding is still limited: additional research is required before metabarcoding can be confidently utilized for quantitative applications. Until then, we advocate the inclusion of mock communities when metabarcoding as this facilitates direct assessment of the quantitative ability of any given study.
© 2018 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomass; high-throughput sequencing; meta-analysis; metabarcoding; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30408260     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  29 in total

1.  Distribution patterns of fungal taxa and inferred functional traits reflect the non-uniform vertical stratification of soil microhabitats in a coastal pine forest.

Authors:  Kerri Kluting; Karina Clemmensen; Stanislovas Jonaitis; Rimvydas Vasaitis; Sara Holmström; Roger Finlay; Anna Rosling
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Ashley M Reaume; Emily Farrell; Michelle R Gaither
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Comparison of traditional and DNA metabarcoding samples for monitoring tropical soil arthropods (Formicidae, Collembola and Isoptera).

Authors:  Yves Basset; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Michael T G Wright; Anakena M Castillo; David A Donoso; Simon T Segar; Daniel Souto-Vilarós; Dina Y Soliman; Tomas Roslin; M Alex Smith; Greg P A Lamarre; Luis F De León; Thibaud Decaëns; José G Palacios-Vargas; Gabriela Castaño-Meneses; Rudolf H Scheffrahn; Marleny Rivera; Filonila Perez; Ricardo Bobadilla; Yacksecari Lopez; José Alejandro Ramirez Silva; Maira Montejo Cruz; Angela Arango Galván; Héctor Barrios
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Ecosystem-specific microbiota and microbiome databases in the era of big data.

Authors:  Victor Lobanov; Angélique Gobet; Alyssa Joyce
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  Quantification of marine benthic communities with metabarcoding.

Authors:  Lise Klunder; Judith D L van Bleijswijk; Loran Kleine Schaars; Henk W van der Veer; Pieternella C Luttikhuizen; Allert I Bijleveld
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 8.678

6.  Combining stable isotopes, morphological, and molecular analyses to reconstruct the diet of free-ranging consumers.

Authors:  Michaël Bonin; Christian Dussault; Joëlle Taillon; Nicolas Lecomte; Steeve D Côté
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Unraveling the Diversity of Eukaryotic Microplankton in a Large and Deep Perialpine Lake Using a High Throughput Sequencing Approach.

Authors:  Nico Salmaso; Adriano Boscaini; Massimo Pindo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Pollinator specialization increases with a decrease in a mass-flowering plant in networks inferred from DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  André Pornon; Sandra Baksay; Nathalie Escaravage; Monique Burrus; Christophe Andalo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Genome-skimming provides accurate quantification for pollen mixtures.

Authors:  Dandan Lang; Min Tang; Jiahui Hu; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.

Authors:  Beverly McClenaghan; Zacchaeus G Compson; Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.