| Literature DB >> 31938472 |
André Pornon1, Sandra Baksay1, Nathalie Escaravage1, Monique Burrus1, Christophe Andalo1.
Abstract
How native mass-flowering plants affect the specialization of insects at individual and species levels and the consequences for pollination networks have received much less attention than for mass-flowering crops or alien species and basically remain unexplored.Using existing DNA metabarcoding data on the pollen loads of 402 flower-visiting insects, we assessed the effects of a native mass-flowering plant of high reward quality, the shrub Rhododendron ferrugineum, on pollination networks by investigating: (a) the food niches of individual pollinators and pollinator species and (b) the structure of individual and species networks in subalpine heathland patches with extremely contrasted densities of R. ferrugineum.Relative to its high abundance in high-density patches, the shrub was greatly underrepresented and did not dominate individual's or species' generalized networks, rather individual and species specialization increased with a decrease in R. ferrugineum density. Furthermore, individuals of the more generalist dipteran Empididae species tended to extend exclusive interactions with rare plant species in low-density networks. The same trend was observed in the more specialist Apidea but toward rare species in high-density networks. Our results reveal a quite paradoxical view of pollination and a functional complementarity within networks. Niche and network indices mostly based on the occurrence of links showed that individual pollinators and pollinator species and networks were highly generalized, whereas indices of link strength revealed that species and above all individuals behave as quite strict specialists. Synthesis. Our study provides insights into the status of a native mass-flowering plant in individual's and insect species' food niches and pollination networks. It revealed that a generalist pollinator species can be highly specialized at the individual level and how rare plant species coexisting with mass-flowering plants may nevertheless be visited.Entities:
Keywords: DNA metabarcoding; food niche breadth; individual pollination network; mass‐flowering species; pollinator generalization; pollinator specialization; species pollination networks
Year: 2019 PMID: 31938472 PMCID: PMC6953672 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Characteristics of vegetation in heathland patches
| Heathland patches | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDP1 | LDP2 | HDP1 | HDP2 | |
|
| 0.17 | 0.6 | 2 | 15.8 |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.93 | 3.2 | 98 | 69.5 |
| Surrounding community cover (%) | 99.07 | 96.8 | 2 | 30.5 |
| Number of species in SC | 32 | 11 | 12 | 16 |
|
| ||||
|
| 27 | 107 | 2,788 | 2,273 |
| Surrounding community | 273 | 41 | 0.84 | 7 |
| Total | 300 | 148 | 2,789 | 2,280 |
|
| ||||
|
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2.6 | 15.7 | 0 | 0.1 |
|
| 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2.3 | 4.2 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 3.7 | 0 | 0.1 |
|
| 47.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1.5 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1.7 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 12.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Only species with a cover of more than 1% in a given patch are listed.
Abbreviations: HDP1 and HDP1, patches with high floral density; LDP1 and LDP2, patches with low floral density; SC, the surrounding community.
Network and food niche indices and their ecological significance
| Ecological significance | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Connectance (C) | The proportion of possible links actually realized in a network. C decreases with specialization and network size |
| Nestedness | Specialization asymmetry: the degree to which specialists (plants and insects) interact with generalists (plants and insects). High nestedness is generally considered to increase network robustness in the face of perturbations |
| Interaction evenness (E) | Evenness of interaction frequencies between different pairs of species. The lower the evenness, the higher the specialization in the network |
|
| Degree of network specialization |
| Kullback‐Leibler distance | Degree of individual or species specialization in networks. The level of exclusiveness of an insect species (in species networks) or an individual (in individual networks) on rare plant species |
|
| |
| Mean linkage degree of individual ( | Mean diet breath of individual or species pollinators, respectively |
| Species | The degree to which species or individuals specialize in some species among all the plant species in their food niche |
| Within (WIC)‐ versus between‐individual component (BIC) of population food niche | Proportion of the total food niche width (TNW) of the population explained by intraindividual versus interindividual diet diversification |
| Interindividual diet overlap (IO) | The extent to which individual insects share and potentially compete for the same plant resources |
| Interspecies diet overlap (SPO) | The extent to which species share and potentially compete for the same plant resources |
| Proportional niche similarity (PS | The extent to which conspecific individuals use the same resources as their population |
Figure 1Change in linkage degrees from community to individual pollinators. L sp and L: species and individual linkage degrees; L sp (80%) and L (80%): minimum number of links required to gather 80% of the pollen load of a pollinator species and of each individual, respectively. Box‐and‐whisker plots represent values for all combinations of patches × species
Figure 2Variation in food niche breadth among pollinator families. SPO, species food niche overlap; TNW, total niche width; WIC, within‐individual component of niche breadth
Figure 3Effects (mixed linear model) of Rhododendron ferrugineum floral density on species and individual food niches and networks. Black lines show the independent effects of floral density, and the colored lines show family‐floral density interaction effects. The size of the symbols is proportional to the size of the sample