Literature DB >> 30408173

Measurement reliability of phonation threshold pressure in pediatric subjects.

Matthew R Hoffman1, Austin J Scholp1, Calvin D Hedberg1, Jim R Lamb1, Maia N Braden1, J Scott McMurray1, Jack J Jiang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Phonation threshold pressure (PTP), the minimum subglottal pressure (Ps ) required for phonation, is sensitive to changes in laryngeal biomechanics and is often elevated with pathology. Little is reported on PTP in children; challenges with task performance and measurement reliability represent barriers to routine clinical assessment. STUDY
DESIGN: Pilot study evaluating PTP and Ps measurement reliability in children using labial and mechanical interruption.
METHODS: Twenty-two subjects aged 4 to 17 years (10.7 ± 3.9 years) participated. Ten trials were performed for each method; task order was randomized. For labial interruption, subjects produced /pα/ five times at softest (onset PTP) and comfortable amplitude. For mechanical interruption, subjects produced a sustained /α/ while a balloon valve interrupted phonation five times for 250 ms each; mechanical interruption was performed with a mouthpiece and mask. PTP was recorded as the difference between Ps and supraglottal pressure at phonation cessation (offset PTP). Mean PTP and Ps and intrasubject coefficients of variation were compared. Correlations with age were evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean PTP (P < .001) and Ps (P = .005) were higher for labial interruption. Intrasubject coefficients of variation for PTP (P = .554) and Ps (P = .305) were similar across methods. Coefficient of variation was related to age for mechanical-mask trials only (r = -0.628, P = .00175).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in means are likely related to differences in task and PTP hysteresis effect. Reliability is comparable with all methods; using a mouthpiece may be preferable to a mask for mechanical interruption. Measurement of PTP is noninvasive, reliable, and may be a useful adjunct in pediatric voice assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b Laryngoscope, 129:1520-1526, 2019.
© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phonation threshold pressure; aerodynamic; airflow interruption; pediatric; subglottal pressure; voice

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30408173      PMCID: PMC6506412          DOI: 10.1002/lary.27418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  34 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of aerodynamic parameters obtained by airflow interruption: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jack Jiang; Jennifer Stern
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Estimating subglottal pressure via airflow interruption with auditory masking.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.

Authors:  Gail B Kempster; Bruce R Gerratt; Katherine Verdolini Abbott; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Data on subglottal pressure and SPL at varied vocal loudness and pitch in 8- to 11-year-old children.

Authors:  A McAllister; J Sundberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  A comparison of subglottal and intraoral pressure measurements during phonation.

Authors:  S Hertegård; J Gauffin; P A Lindestad
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Initial validation of an indirect measure of subglottal pressure during vowels.

Authors:  A Löfqvist; B Carlborg; P Kitzing
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production.

Authors:  J R Smitheran; T J Hixon
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1981-05

8.  The paediatric voice clinic.

Authors:  Ian Smillie; Kirsy McManus; Wendy Cohen; Elizabeth Lawson; David MacGregor Wynne
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Attitudes of children with dysphonia.

Authors:  Nadine P Connor; Stacy B Cohen; Shannon M Theis; Susan L Thibeault; Diane G Heatley; Diane M Bless
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Multidimensional evaluation of vocal quality in children with cochlear implants: a cross-sectional, case-controlled study.

Authors:  H-W Hsu; T-J Fang; L-A Lee; Y-T Tsou; S H Chen; C-M Wu
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.597

View more
  2 in total

1.  Retest Reliability for Complete Airway Interruption Systems of Aerodynamic Measurement.

Authors:  Jim R Lamb; Sarah A Schultz; Austin J Scholp; Emily R Wendel; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Age and Sex Comparison of Aerodynamic Phonation Measurements Using Noninvasive Assessment.

Authors:  Jim R Lamb; Austin J Scholp; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.