Literature DB >> 18538988

Estimating subglottal pressure via airflow interruption with auditory masking.

Matthew R Hoffman1, Jack J Jiang.   

Abstract

Current noninvasive measurement of subglottal pressure using airflow interruption often produces inconsistent results due to the elicitation of audio-laryngeal reflexes. Auditory feedback could be considered as a means of ensuring measurement accuracy and precision. The purpose of this study was to determine if auditory masking could be used with the airflow interruption system to improve intrasubject consistency. A prerecorded sample of subject phonation was played on a loop over headphones during the trials with auditory masking. This provided subjects with a target pitch and blocked out distracting ambient noise created by the airflow interrupter. Subglottal pressure was noninvasively measured using the airflow interruption system. Thirty subjects, divided into two equal groups, performed 10 trials without auditory masking and 10 trials with auditory masking. Group one performed the normal trials first, followed by the trials with auditory masking. Group two performed the auditory masking trials first, followed by the normal trials. Intrasubject consistency was improved by adding auditory masking, resulting in a decrease in average intrasubject standard deviation from 0.93+/-0.51 to 0.47+/-0.22 cm H(2)O (P < 0.001). Auditory masking can be used effectively to combat audio-laryngeal reflexes and aid subjects in maintaining constant glottal configuration and frequency, thereby increasing intrasubject consistency when measuring subglottal pressure. By considering auditory feedback, a more reliable method of measurement was developed. This method could be used by clinicians, as reliable, immediately available values of subglottal pressure are useful in evaluating laryngeal health and monitoring treatment progress.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18538988      PMCID: PMC2918247          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  19 in total

1.  Sound-induced laryngeal and respiratory reflexes originate from vestibular afferents.

Authors:  N Kobayashi; K Shiba; K Nakazawa; I Satoh; Y Nakajima; A Konno
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-01-17       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Vocal cord closure pressure during volitional swallow and other voluntary tasks.

Authors:  Reza Shaker; Kulwinder S Dua; Junlong Ren; Pengyan Xie; Akira Funahashi; Ralph M Schapira
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  REGULATORY MECHANISM OF VOICE INTENSITY VARIATION.

Authors:  N ISSHIKI
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1964-03

4.  Evaluation of airway interruption technique as a method for measuring pulmonary airflow resistance.

Authors:  J MEAD; J L WHITTENBERGER
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Noninvasive technique for estimating subglottic pressure and laryngeal efficiency.

Authors:  M C Bard; D H Slavit; T V McCaffrey; R J Lipton
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Effect of various sensory stimuli on reflex laryngeal adduction.

Authors:  M Suzuki; C T Sasaki
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Phonation threshold pressure measurements during phonation by airflow interruption.

Authors:  J Jiang; T O'Mara; D Conley; D Hanson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Vocal efficiency measurements in subjects with vocal polyps and nodules: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jack Jiang; Jennifer Stern; Hui-Jun Chen; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation.

Authors:  S Sapir; M D McClean; C R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Measurement reliability of phonation threshold pressure in pediatric subjects.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Austin J Scholp; Calvin D Hedberg; Jim R Lamb; Maia N Braden; J Scott McMurray; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Comparison of labial and mechanical interruption for measurement of aerodynamic parameters.

Authors:  William J Chapin; Matthew R Hoffman; Adam L Rieves; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Evaluation of auditory and visual feedback for airflow interruption.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Adam L Rieves; Ketan Surender; Erin E Devine; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Indirect estimation of laryngeal resistance via airflow redirection.

Authors:  Adam L Rieves; Matthew R Hoffman; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.547

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.