Literature DB >> 33606949

Age and Sex Comparison of Aerodynamic Phonation Measurements Using Noninvasive Assessment.

Jim R Lamb1, Austin J Scholp1, Jack J Jiang1.   

Abstract

Purpose The goal of this study was to present vocal aerodynamic measurements from pediatric and adult participant pools. There are a number of anatomical changes involving the larynx and vocal folds that occur as children age and become adults. Data were collected using two methods of noninvasive aerodynamic assessment: mechanical interruption and labial interruption. Method A total of 154 participants aged 4-24 years old took part in this study. Ten trials were performed for both methods of airway interruption. To perform mechanical interruption, participants phonated /α/ for 10 s trials while a balloon valve interrupted phonation 5 times. For labial interruption, participants said /pα/ 5 times at comfortable and quiet volumes. Aerodynamic measures included subglottal pressure, phonation threshold pressure, mean airflow, laryngeal resistance, and others. Results One hundred one participants (51 females) successfully completed testing with both methods. Eight out of 20 measurements were found to have a statistically significant effect of participant age on measurements. Sex alone had a significant effect on vocal efficiency for the labial quiet method. Conclusions The data discussed here can be used to view age and sex trends in vocal aerodynamic measurements. When using either method of mechanical or labial interruption, participant age needs to be taken into account to properly interpret several aerodynamic parameters. A participant's sex is not as important when using these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606949      PMCID: PMC8608227          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  32 in total

1.  Estimated subglottic pressure in normal and dysphonic subjects.

Authors:  A Giovanni; C Heim; D Demolin; J M Triglia
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Direct and indirect determination of the mean subglottic pressure; sound level, mean subglottic pressure, mean air flow, subglottic power and efficiency of a male voice for the vowel (a).

Authors:  J VAN DEN BERG
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1956

3.  Reliability and applicability of aerodynamic measures in dysphonia assessment.

Authors:  Edwin M L Yiu; Yuet-Ming Yuen; Tara Whitehill; Alison Winkworth
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2004 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Relationship Between Subglottal Pressure and Sound Pressure Level in Untrained Voices.

Authors:  Staffan Björklund; Johan Sundberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  On the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in phonation.

Authors:  I R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vocal efficiency and aerodynamic aspects in voice disorders.

Authors:  S Tanaka; W J Gould
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Developmental patterns of laryngeal and respiratory function for speech production.

Authors:  R Netsell; W K Lotz; J E Peters; L Schulte
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Vocal efficiency measurements in subjects with vocal polyps and nodules: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jack Jiang; Jennifer Stern; Hui-Jun Chen; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Phonation threshold flow measurements in normal and pathological phonation.

Authors:  Peiyun Zhuang; Alicia J Sprecher; Matthew R Hoffman; Yi Zhang; Marios Fourakis; Jack J Jiang; Chun Sheng Wei
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Measurement of phonation threshold power in normal and disordered voice production.

Authors:  Peiyun Zhuang; Joanna T Swinarska; Camille F Robieux; Matthew R Hoffman; Shengzhi Lin; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.