Literature DB >> 30407869

Prospective Assessment of the Feasibility of a Trial of Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation for Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure.

Michael J Lanspa1,2, Michelle Ng Gong3, David A Schoenfeld4,5, Kathleen Tiffany Lee4,5, Colin K Grissom1,2, Peter C Hou6, Ary Serpa-Neto7, Samuel M Brown1,2, Theodore J Iwashyna8, Donald M Yealy9, Catherine L Hough10, Roy G Brower11, Carolyn S Calfee12, Robert C Hyzy8, Michael A Matthay12, Russell R Miller1,2, Jay S Steingrub13, B Taylor Thompson4, Chadwick D Miller14, Terry P Clemmer2,15, Gregory W Hendey16, David T Huang9, Kusum S Mathews17, Nida Qadir16, Mark Tidswell18.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Low-tidal volume ventilation (LTVV; 6 ml/kg) benefits patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and may aid those with other causes of respiratory failure. Current early ventilation practices are poorly defined.
OBJECTIVES: We observed patients with acute respiratory failure to assess the feasibility of a pragmatic trial of LTVV and to guide experimental design.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to intensive care units expected to participate in the proposed trial. We collected clinical data as well as information on initial and daily ventilator settings and inpatient mortality. We estimated the benefit of LTVV using predictive linear and nonlinear models. We simulated models to estimate power and feasibility of a cluster-randomized trial of LTVV versus usual care in acute respiratory failure.
RESULTS: We included 2,484 newly mechanically ventilated patients (31% with acute respiratory distress syndrome) from 49 hospitals. Hospital mortality was 28%. Mean initial tidal volume was 7.1 ml/kg predicted body weight (95% confidence interval, 7.1-7.2), with 78% of patients receiving tidal volumes less than or equal to 8 ml/kg. Our models estimated a mortality benefit of 0-2% from LTVV compared with usual care. Simulation of a stepped-wedged cluster-randomized trial suggested that enrollment of 106,361 patients would be necessary to achieve greater than 90% power.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of initial tidal volumes less than 8 ml/kg predicted body weight was common at hospitals participating in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) Network. After considering the size and budgetary requirement for a cluster-randomized trial of LTVV versus usual care in acute respiratory failure, the PETAL Network deemed the proposed trial infeasible. A rapid observational study and simulations to model anticipated power may help better design trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute respiratory distress syndrome; low-stretch ventilation; low–tidal volume ventilation; lung-protective ventilation; mechanical ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30407869      PMCID: PMC6394119          DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201807-459OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  25 in total

1.  Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.

Authors:  Giacomo Bellani; John G Laffey; Tài Pham; Eddy Fan; Laurent Brochard; Andres Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Frank van Haren; Anders Larsson; Daniel F McAuley; Marco Ranieri; Gordon Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Hermann Wrigge; Arthur S Slutsky; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Prehospital tidal volume influences hospital tidal volume: A cohort study.

Authors:  Andrew J Stoltze; Terrence S Wong; Karisa K Harland; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Roy G Brower; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Underuse of lung protective ventilation: analysis of potential factors to explain physician behavior.

Authors:  Ravi Kalhan; Mark Mikkelsen; Pali Dedhiya; Jason Christie; Christine Gaughan; Paul N Lanken; Barbara Finkel; Robert Gallop; Barry D Fuchs
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial.

Authors:  Brian M Fuller; Ian T Ferguson; Nicholas M Mohr; Anne M Drewry; Christopher Palmer; Brian T Wessman; Enyo Ablordeppey; Jacob Keeperman; Robert J Stephens; Cristopher C Briscoe; Angelina A Kolomiets; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Sérgio Oliveira Cardoso; José Antônio Manetta; Victor Galvão Moura Pereira; Daniel Crepaldi Espósito; Manoela de Oliveira Prado Pasqualucci; Maria Cecília Toledo Damasceno; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costs.

Authors:  Eric L Eisenstein; Rory Collins; Beena S Cracknell; Oscar Podesta; Elizabeth D Reid; Peter Sandercock; Yuriy Shakhov; Michael L Terrin; Mary Ann Sellers; Robert M Califf; Christopher B Granger; Rafael Diaz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed.

Authors:  Sally Hopewell; Susan Dutton; Ly-Mee Yu; An-Wen Chan; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

9.  PReVENT--protective ventilation in patients without ARDS at start of ventilation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fabienne D Simonis; Jan M Binnekade; Annemarije Braber; Harry P Gelissen; Jeroen Heidt; Janneke Horn; Gerard Innemee; Evert de Jonge; Nicole P Juffermans; Peter E Spronk; Lotte M Steuten; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Marijn Vriends; Gwendolyn de Vreede; Rob B de Wilde; Ary Serpa Neto; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Value of Information: A Tool to Improve Research Prioritization and Reduce Waste.

Authors:  Cosetta Minelli; Gianluca Baio
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  9 in total

1.  Variability in sedation assessment among intubated patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Tessa L Steel; Sharukh Lokhandwala; Ellen S Caldwell; Nicholas J Johnson; Chadwick D Miller; Michelle N Gong; Catherine L Hough
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 5.221

2.  Epidemiology, Mechanical Power, and 3-Year Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients Using Standardized Screening. An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ken Kuljit S Parhar; Karolina Zjadewicz; Andrea Soo; Alan Sutton; Margaret Zjadewicz; Lauren Doig; Calvin Lam; Andre Ferland; Daniel J Niven; Kirsten M Fiest; Henry T Stelfox; Christopher J Doig
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-10

Review 3.  Performance Measure Development, Use, and Measurement of Effectiveness Using the Guideline on Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Authors:  Kathryn A Artis; Raed A Dweik; Bela Patel; Curtis H Weiss; Kevin C Wilson; Anna R Gagliardi; Sue Huckson; Monika Nothacker; Neill K J Adhikari; Andre Carlos Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral; Ian J Barbash; W Graham Carlos; Deena Kelly Costa; Mark L Metersky; Richard A Mularski; Michael W Sjoding; Carey C Thomson; Robert C Hyzy
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-12

4.  Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data.

Authors:  Gregory B Rehm; Irene Cortés-Puch; Brooks T Kuhn; Jimmy Nguyen; Sarina A Fazio; Michael A Johnson; Nicholas R Anderson; Chen-Nee Chuah; Jason Y Adams
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Ventilation management in acute respiratory failure related to COVID-19 versus ARDS from another origin - a descriptive narrative review.

Authors:  Anissa M Tsonas; Michela Botta; Ary Serpa Neto; Janneke Horn; Frederique Paulus; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  What's to Be Found in the Wisdom of the Crowd?

Authors:  Jason R Carr; Ithan D Peltan; Michael J Lanspa
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-12

7.  Impact of Clinician Recognition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Evidenced-Based Interventions in the Medical ICU.

Authors:  V Eric Kerchberger; Ryan M Brown; Matthew W Semler; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; David R Janz; Julie A Bastarache; Lorraine B Ware
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-07-06

8.  Driving pressure is not associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients without ARDS.

Authors:  Michael J Lanspa; Ithan D Peltan; Jason R Jacobs; Jeffrey S Sorensen; Lori Carpenter; Jeffrey P Ferraro; Samuel M Brown; Jay G Berry; Raj Srivastava; Colin K Grissom
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 9.  Emerging concepts in ventilation-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Purnema Madahar; Jeremy R Beitler
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.