Joshua C Magee1, Sarah Adut1, Kevin Brazill2, Stephen Warnick3. 1. Miami University, Department of Psychology, 90 North Patterson Ave., Oxford, OH 45056. 2. University of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign/Carle Physician Group, Department of Family Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, 611 West Park St., Urbana, IL 61801. 3. University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Family Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, 1150 W. Medical Center Dr., M7300 Med Sci I, SPC 5625, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5625.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mental health apps are intriguing yet challenging tools for addressing barriers to treatment in primary care. In the current review, we seek to assist primary care professionals with evaluating and integrating mental health apps into practice. We briefly summarize two leading frameworks for evaluating mental health apps and conduct a systematic review of mental health apps across a variety of areas commonly encountered in primary care. RECENT FINDINGS: Existing frameworks can guide professionals and patients through the process of identifying apps and evaluating dimensions such as privacy and security, credibility, and user experience. For specific apps, several problem areas appear to have relatively more scientific evaluation in the current app landscape, including PTSD, smoking, and alcohol use. Other areas such as eating disorders not only lack evaluation, but contain a significant subset of apps providing potentially harmful advice. SUMMARY: Overall, individuals seeking mental health apps will likely encounter strengths such as symptom tracking and psychoeducational components, while encountering common weaknesses such as insufficient privacy settings and little integration of empirically-supported techniques. While mental health apps may have more promise than ever, significant barriers to finding functional, usable, effective apps remain for health professionals and patients alike.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mental health apps are intriguing yet challenging tools for addressing barriers to treatment in primary care. In the current review, we seek to assist primary care professionals with evaluating and integrating mental health apps into practice. We briefly summarize two leading frameworks for evaluating mental health apps and conduct a systematic review of mental health apps across a variety of areas commonly encountered in primary care. RECENT FINDINGS: Existing frameworks can guide professionals and patients through the process of identifying apps and evaluating dimensions such as privacy and security, credibility, and user experience. For specific apps, several problem areas appear to have relatively more scientific evaluation in the current app landscape, including PTSD, smoking, and alcohol use. Other areas such as eating disorders not only lack evaluation, but contain a significant subset of apps providing potentially harmful advice. SUMMARY: Overall, individuals seeking mental health apps will likely encounter strengths such as symptom tracking and psychoeducational components, while encountering common weaknesses such as insufficient privacy settings and little integration of empirically-supported techniques. While mental health apps may have more promise than ever, significant barriers to finding functional, usable, effective apps remain for health professionals and patients alike.
Authors: Bettina B Hoeppner; Susanne S Hoeppner; Lourah Seaboyer; Melissa R Schick; Gwyneth W Y Wu; Brandon G Bergman; John F Kelly Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Bettina B Hoeppner; Melissa R Schick; Lourah M Kelly; Susanne S Hoeppner; Brandon Bergman; John F Kelly Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-09-12
Authors: Mia T Minen; Samrachana Adhikari; Jane Padikkala; Sumaiya Tasneem; Ashley Bagheri; Eric Goldberg; Scott Powers; Richard B Lipton Journal: Headache Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Agnes Rieger; Averi Gaines; Ian Barnett; Claudia Frances Baldassano; Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; Paul Crits-Christoph Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2019-08-29
Authors: Nidal Drissi; Sofia Ouhbi; Mohammed Abdou Janati Idrissi; Luis Fernandez-Luque; Mounir Ghogho Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 5.428