Literature DB >> 30395265

The cytogenetic constitution of human blastocysts: insights from comprehensive chromosome screening strategies.

Elpida Fragouli1,2, Santiago Munne3,4,5, Dagan Wells1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Embryos that are able to form blastocysts have succeeded in activating their genome and differentiating into two cell types-an external layer of trophectoderm cells, which will go on to form extra-embryonic tissues such as the placenta, and the inner cell mass, which will give rise to the embryo proper. Culturing embryos to the blastocyst stage has become an increasingly popular IVF practice over the past decade. Additionally, it has been proposed that the identification and transfer of euploid blastocysts could significantly improve IVF outcomes. Toward this end, comprehensive molecular cytogenetic methods have been developed. The application of such methods in both clinical and research contexts has yielded cytogenetic data from large numbers of blastocysts. Questions have been raised concerning the implantation potential of blastocysts diagnosed 'euploid' or 'aneuploid', and there has been particular debate over the detection and viability of embryos categorized as 'mosaic'-composed of a mixture of normal and aneuploid cells. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This review aims to summarize data from studies using comprehensive molecular cytogenetic methods to examine blastocyst-stage embryos, describing current knowledge related to rates of euploidy, uniform aneuploidy and mosaicism. Issues associated with the developmental capacity of blastocysts of different cytogenetic constitutions will also be addressed. Guidelines on the clinical management of blastocysts with varying chromosome complements will be considered. SEARCH
METHODS: Rates of euploidy, uniform aneuploidy (in which all cells have the same abnormal karyotype) and mosaicism were determined via a thorough literature search (PubMed). The keywords used in the search were as follows: preimplantation embryo development, blastocyst stage, embryonic aneuploidy, meiotic chromosome malsegregation, post-zygotic chromosome malsegregation, comprehensive chromosome screening, array comparative genomic hybridization, single-nucleotide polymorphism array, next-generation sequencing, embryo mosaicism and implantation of mosaic embryos. Relevant articles written in English and published up to March 2018 were reviewed. OUTCOMES: Different types of aneuploidy, including some complex forms, are capable of persisting to the blastocyst stage. As expected, euploidy rates decreased with advancing female age, whereas uniform aneuploidy increased. Analysis of multiple cells from individual blastocysts revealed that most of those classified 'abnormal' contained no euploid cells (due to meiotic errors arising in the gametes and therefore present in every cell), some having additional mosaic (post-fertilization, mitotic) errors. Blastocysts with a mix of normal and aneuploid cells were observed less frequently than other classes of embryo. The transfer of embryos with diploid-aneuploid mosaic biopsy specimens is reportedly associated with higher miscarriage and lower implantation rates, compared to embryos in which only euploid cells are detected. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Detailed investigations into the chromosome constitution of human blastocysts suggest that a significant proportion is euploid in every cell, although the exact fraction is strongly influenced by female age. These findings do not support the notion that mosaic chromosome abnormalities are a natural part of embryo development. Mosaic aneuploidies, arising post-zygotically, were detected by various different comprehensive molecular cytogenetic methods, suggesting that the majority of these represent genuine findings. However, it remains possible that certain comprehensive molecular cytogenetic methods may carry a risk of mosaicism being incorrectly assigned, in a minority of samples, as a result of technical artifact. This may be a consequence of degraded DNA in the trophectoderm biopsy or other technical issues. According to published studies, blastocysts considered to have uniform aneuploidy and, to a lesser extent, those with mosaic abnormalities were associated with poorer clinical outcomes in comparison with euploid embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30395265     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  21 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Male factor infertility impacts the rate of mosaic blastocysts in cycles of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Cristina Lagalla; Giovanni Coticchio; Carlotta Zacà; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  mtDNA dynamics between cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts.

Authors:  Neelke De Munck; Alberto Liñán; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Carmen Rubio; Nicolas Garrido; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Yichao Niu; Anran Wan; Ting Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Apoptotic qPCR gene expression array analysis demonstrates proof-of-concept for rapid blastocoel fluid-conditioned media molecular prediction.

Authors:  Arnav Lal; Allison Kranyak; Jonathan Blalock; Deepti Athavale; Alyssa Barré; Addison Doran; T Arthur Chang; Randal D Robinson; Shawn Zimmerman; J David Wininger; Lauren A Fowler; William E Roudebush; Renee J Chosed
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 6.  Stem Cell-Based Trophoblast Models to Unravel the Genetic Causes of Human Miscarriages.

Authors:  Tatiana V Nikitina; Igor N Lebedev
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.666

7.  The effect of trophectoderm biopsy technique and sample handling on artefactual mosaicism.

Authors:  Lluc Coll; Mònica Parriego; Beatriz Carrasco; Ignacio Rodríguez; Montserrat Boada; Buenaventura Coroleu; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Francesca Vidal; Anna Veiga
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Incidence, Origin, and Predictive Model for the Detection and Clinical Management of Segmental Aneuploidies in Human Embryos.

Authors:  Laura Girardi; Munevver Serdarogullari; Cristina Patassini; Maurizio Poli; Marco Fabiani; Silvia Caroselli; Onder Coban; Necati Findikli; Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Mustafa Bahceci; Rupali Chopra; Rita Canipari; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Ubaldi; Eva Hoffmann; Carmen Rubio; Carlos Simon; Antonio Capalbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-Based Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) of Trophectoderm Biopsy for Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF) Patients: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Yichao Niu; Anran Wan; Ting Zhang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.060

10.  Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Mourad; Roland Antaki; François Bissonnette; Obey Al Baini; Boutros Saadeh; Wael Jamal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.